Channel
@glashashop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
284subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003876401134 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glashashop |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 15 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glashashop |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 284 | -1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 285 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 287 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 286 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 288 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 286 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 289 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 288 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 288 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Супер редкий лот - сумочка La Saucisse Petite, за которой, знаю, многие охотятся Бренд MERCY Использовала буквально 2-3 раза, в идеальном состоянии Отрываю от сердца, потому что не ношу, так как поняла, что хозяйка должна быть немного миниатюрней, для меня она слишком мала по пропорциям (я ростом 183 см), на девочку ниже будет идеально♥️ Сейчас такую уже не купить 2ОООО₽
🔥1
1. CC-крем ERBORIAN, 45ml Новый, в упаковке, легендарный продукт 25ОО₽ ____ 2. Блеск для губ D’ALBA Оттенок feeble pink Новый, в упаковке Афигенский новый продукт, сама другим оттенком пользуюсь, очень красиво смотрится на губах и круто увлажняет 14ОО₽ ____ 3. Стик RADIANT PROFESSIONAL Оттенок 08, pecan Новый, в упаковке, по сути скульптор, очень крутая текстура 18ОО₽ ____ 4. Бальзам для губ THIM Оттенок…
❤1
1. Карандаш для губ NIKK MOLE Оттенки: 504, 510 Новые, в упаковке 4ООР за 1шт ___ 2. Двусторонние тени для глаз THIM Оттенок 03 В упаковке, сделаны свотчи 14ОО₽ ___ 3. Тени-карандаш для бровей THIM Оттенок 03 В упаковке, сделаны свотчи 13ОО₽ ___ 4. Двусторонняя подводка для глаз THIM Оттенок 02 В упаковке, сделаны свотчи 15ОО₽ ___ 5. Карандаш для глаз ARIVE MAKEUP Оттенок 12 Новый, в упаковке 3ОО₽
1. Тинтер KRYGINA COSMETICS Оттенки: peony, magnolia Новые в упаковке, очень красивые цвета 12ОО₽ _______ 2. Мусс для губ и щек ARIVE MAKEUP Оттенки: 01, 02 Новые в упаковке 45О₽ ___ 3. Пудра рассыпчатая прозрачная CLIMT COSMETICS Новая, в упаковке 5ОО₽ ___ 4. Компактная пудра RADIANT PROFESSIONAL Оттенок: 01 Новая в упаковке 16ОО₽ ___ 5. Хайлайтер THIM Оттенок: 01 moonlight Новая в упаковке 16ОО₽
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @glashashop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глашин магазин” (@glashashop), 284 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glashashop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.