Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KG. @kinggugun

Channel

KG. @kinggugun

@giugun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002384790623
TypeChannel
Username@giugun
Descriptionp. @kinggugun
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/giugun

Growth

17 August 2026 — 1 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:321no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:121first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Videos
4
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,588 reactions across 13 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.72% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 60780819560152465063138.72%
custom 61748510223478323393098.61%
custom 61744908807501277883048.47%
custom 62467372600755510682857.94%
custom 61006336138107982002577.16%
custom 62694430170027162522547.08%
custom 60911237058139292642386.63%
custom 61749334513601780602356.55%
custom 51882096834117806552306.41%
custom 52852688747852141212296.38%
custom 61996798073792148792266.30%
custom 61137658929301468452045.69%
custom 5285065654112634805812.26%
custom 5285516024383298739742.06%
custom 5235469076880440426732.03%
custom 6093380436250069580561.56%
custom 6246660676513696111280.78%
custom 6246991084052810195260.725%
custom 6287059005755888731190.53%
custom 6310080185081268544180.502%
8 further kinds1293.60%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,588reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 18 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @giugun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2025 to 18 May 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 May 2025, 14:12 UTC≈1,860 views192 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 624699108405281019526custom 624666067651369611119custom 631008018508126854418custom 624442735794428593817custom 624670238064614067417custom 630985844021474422117custom 630963703894560261816custom 630980888488208329816

4 May 2025, 22:25 UTC≈1,630 views276 reactionsread 15 August 2026

👊👊👊

custom 617449088075012778835custom 617493345136017806027custom 617485102234783233925custom 607808195601524650624custom 609112370581392926424custom 611376589293014684524custom 619967980737921487924custom 624673726007555106824

4 May 2025, 22:05 UTC≈1,560 views292 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 607808195601524650642custom 624673726007555106827custom 617485102234783233926custom 528526887478521412125custom 609112370581392926425custom 611376589293014684525custom 619967980737921487925custom 626944301700271625225

4 May 2025, 13:15 UTC≈1,550 views310 reactionsread 15 August 2026

menyala anjing jebol rate

custom 518820968341178065538custom 617493345136017806032custom 611376589293014684530custom 528526887478521412129custom 607808195601524650626custom 609112370581392926426custom 610063361381079820026custom 617485102234783233926

4 May 2025, 10:35 UTC≈1,510 views291 reactionsread 15 August 2026

gacor bet ch lu

custom 528526887478521412133custom 518820968341178065527custom 609112370581392926426custom 610063361381079820026custom 617449088075012778826custom 617493345136017806026custom 619967980737921487926custom 626944301700271625226

3 May 2025, 06:31 UTC≈1,530 views301 reactionsread 15 August 2026

anjir ch lu keren amat bro

custom 617449088075012778830custom 607808195601524650629custom 624673726007555106829custom 611376589293014684528custom 609112370581392926427custom 610063361381079820027custom 617493345136017806027custom 518820968341178065526

2 May 2025, 08:55 UTC≈1,510 views288 reactionsread 15 August 2026

mau lu ngecopy sampe mirip kali ama gua jg masih lebih keren gua😭😭

custom 609112370581392926431custom 610063361381079820029custom 617449088075012778829custom 626944301700271625227custom 617493345136017806026custom 528526887478521412125custom 607808195601524650625custom 624673726007555106825

2 May 2025, 08:48 UTC≈1,530 views282 reactionsread 15 August 2026

lu gak akan sekeren gua 🤩

custom 617485102234783233931custom 609112370581392926429custom 619967980737921487928custom 626944301700271625226custom 528526887478521412125custom 607808195601524650624custom 610063361381079820024custom 611376589293014684524

30 Apr 2025, 15:22 UTC≈1,550 views273 reactionsread 15 August 2026

maaf ya karna terlalu terang, sampai nyinarin lu yang gelap itu🥹

custom 624673726007555106829custom 610063361381079820027custom 609112370581392926426custom 528526887478521412125custom 518820968341178065524custom 611376589293014684524custom 617449088075012778824custom 617485102234783233924

20 Apr 2025, 13:21 UTC≈2,510 views320 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 617449088075012778833custom 624673726007555106831custom 528506565411263480529custom 528551602438329873929custom 609338043625006958029custom 617493345136017806029custom 523546907688044042628custom 607808195601524650628

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @giugun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,233,573 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KG. @kinggugun” (@giugun), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/giugun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.