Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GirlK1d

Channel

GirlK1d

@girlk1d

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,317subscribers

+11,588 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001685690753
TypeChannel
Username@girlk1d
DescriptionВнешне - девушка, по голосу школотан какой-то о_О ⚡️Связь -> https://t.me/girlk1d?direct 💬Чат канала - https://t.me/+rfrbRGLivH02MGIy ❗️В комментах запрещена реклама, спам, политика и контент 18+❗️
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/girlk1d

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,67834,04327,860.57 August 2026 — 21,729 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,839 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,832 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,829 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,764 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,736 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,709 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,707 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,678 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,707 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,718 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,694 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,758 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,760 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,758 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,751 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,749 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,743 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,727 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,725 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,740 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,753 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,741 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,737 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,729 subscribers7 September 2026 — 21,766 subscribers10 September 2026 — 25,283 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,503 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,629 subscribers16 September 2026 — 26,118 subscribers18 September 2026 — 27,288 subscribers2 October 2026 — 31,731 subscribers7 October 2026 — 31,901 subscribers11 October 2026 — 32,499 subscribers14 October 2026 — 32,884 subscribers15 October 2026 — 33,023 subscribers16 October 2026 — 33,274 subscribers16 October 2026 — 33,497 subscribers17 October 2026 — 33,675 subscribers18 October 2026 — 33,932 subscribers20 October 2026 — 34,043 subscribers21 October 2026 — 33,954 subscribers22 October 2026 — 33,885 subscribers23 October 2026 — 33,824 subscribers24 October 2026 — 33,805 subscribers25 October 2026 — 33,806 subscribers26 October 2026 — 33,753 subscribers27 October 2026 — 33,714 subscribers28 October 2026 — 33,683 subscribers29 October 2026 — 33,636 subscribers30 October 2026 — 33,588 subscribers31 October 2026 — 33,559 subscribers1 November 2026 — 33,520 subscribers2 November 2026 — 33,496 subscribers3 November 2026 — 33,449 subscribers4 November 2026 — 33,426 subscribers5 November 2026 — 33,396 subscribers6 November 2026 — 33,379 subscribers7 November 2026 — 33,317 subscribers33,3177 August 20267 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net +11,588. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,823–35,898 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 11:5733,317-62
6 Nov 2026, 14:2133,379-17
5 Nov 2026, 17:2633,396-30
4 Nov 2026, 14:2933,426-23
3 Nov 2026, 12:3933,449-47
2 Nov 2026, 12:1733,496-24
1 Nov 2026, 14:4633,520-39
31 Oct 2026, 13:0733,559-29
30 Oct 2026, 13:4933,588-48
29 Oct 2026, 10:2833,636-47
28 Oct 2026, 07:1933,683-31
27 Oct 2026, 08:5733,714-39
26 Oct 2026, 09:2733,753-53
25 Oct 2026, 07:3733,806+1
24 Oct 2026, 09:3933,805-19
23 Oct 2026, 09:5233,824-61
22 Oct 2026, 07:3033,885-69
21 Oct 2026, 03:1133,954-89
20 Oct 2026, 01:0834,043+111
18 Oct 2026, 23:3933,932first reading

Engagement

174 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 158 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.9%
avg views ÷ 33,317 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,600
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 174 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held174 (29 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total573,350
Reactions total18,919
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 21:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,280
Videos
≈474
Links
≈663

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17m 52s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

50,959 reactions across 174 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤27,39853.8%
🔥7,07413.9%
❤‍🔥3,5096.89%
💘2,7705.44%
🥰1,7913.51%
😭1,6233.18%
⚡9071.78%
🤡7471.47%
👍6661.31%
🤣5391.06%
👾4140.812%
😢4060.797%
😁3430.673%
👎3160.62%
💋3040.597%
💩2570.504%
😱2430.477%
👀1770.347%
💔1580.31%
custom 54408544258600616671510.296%
35 further kinds1,1662.29%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 174 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50,959 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
292
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 174 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
69
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @girlk1d. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 174 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC≈5,990 views603 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Приехали 🥹

❤431❤‍🔥100🔥50💘7👾5🤩4🙏4🦄2

4 Nov 2026, 12:13 UTC≈10,100 views422 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Кейкапы из вчерашней распаковки наверно самое странное приобретение из магазина с мерчом… Сегодня без подруба, уборка вчера затянулась до 4 утра…

❤316😁48👍28😭12👎6🔥4💔3🤔3

3 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC≈11,000 views406 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Фигурки походу сильно задержатся, предлагаю сегодня перед ранкедами сделать обзор накупленной мерчаги Подруб примерно в ~16:00-17:00 мск

❤316🔥51🥰32❤‍🔥7

1 Nov 2026, 15:49 UTC≈11,900 views301 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤240🐳24❤‍🔥22🥰8💘4🎄1👍1👾1

30 Oct 2026, 08:50 UTC≈13,400 views399 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Я обошла несколько магазинов POP MART в разных городах Китая - ни одной фигурки не было в наличии. На арене мне удалось купить 3-4 штучки, но гештальт не был закрыт полностью. Приедут — распакуем вместе со всем мерчем 😊

💘283❤74😭30🔥7🕊3🤨2

29 Oct 2026, 08:20 UTC≈13,900 views450 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Мое странствие по Китаю подходит к завершению 👀 Последняя остановка в Ченду была всего на несколько часов, и я наконец-то лечу домой. В строю буду уже 30 числа, думаю на днях подрубить и распаковать все ништячки. Чуть позже выкачу пост про Китай с фото-отчетом, потерпите еще пару дней 🫡

❤359👾51💘33❤‍🔥3💅2🔥1🤩1

29 Oct 2026, 00:46 UTC≈12,600 views365 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤252🥰67💋28🔥10⚡4❤‍🔥2💅2

28 Oct 2026, 10:10 UTC≈12,800 views401 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Гонконг ➡️ Ченду Из Саньи в Гонконг не было идей для фото, поэтому один мем пропустила(( Остался еще один рейс из Ченду до Питера, он завтра кстати 👀

❤343❤‍🔥36👎16🔥6

27 Oct 2026, 07:28 UTC≈14,400 views480 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Еще несколько фоточек с Гонконга 😳 Город до безумия интересный и недешевый…

❤360🥰57🔥40😍7❤‍🔥6💘5👾2💋2

26 Oct 2026, 11:09 UTC≈13,000 views254 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤134😱70🔥30🤣18⚡2

26 Oct 2026, 04:45 UTC≈14,000 views493 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤312🥰85👍53🕊18🔥9❤‍🔥4💘4⚡3

23 Oct 2026, 10:44 UTC≈19,100 views399 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⏸️Шпаргалка для Bind Подобный пост был про Abyss, поэтому при смене маппула буду делать и про другие карты. Карта очень сильно зависящая от сбора инфы, флешек и долгих смоков. Ротация у защиты быстрее, поэтому на карте важно уметь фейковать и медленно разыгрывать раунды 👀 3️⃣Тирлист ИМХО, насчет Hush пока сложно что-то сказать, поэтому она в красном тире. Надеюсь надписи все видно + понятно — пишите что думаете в…

💘259❤97🔥24👀5👍4🥰3❤‍🔥2🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @girlk1d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@girlk1d edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 17 posts on @girlk1d as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

lev7radiantvalorantprovlr
@levtvision · 63,163
#1
ROUNDZZ
@roundzz · 82,815
#2
Пивная Таверна
@sayjoshuatwitch · 20,032
#3
hytAIM
@hytaim · 4,375
#4
weskiiy
@wesk11y · 1,496
#5
Lelush vi Britannia
@xLelush · 28,292
#6
FIVESKILL
@f1veskill · 2,373
#7
vladk0r
@vladk0r · 3,840
#8
okki stream
@okki1111 · 1,679
#9
Valorantskiy контент
@valorantskiy · 8,928
#10
Данилка Бебо
@bebrosasi · 19,152
#11
Валорант • Valorant
@valorant_place · 4,481
#12
Gerasim Dungeon
@gerasimshow · 3,046
#13
keila さくら
@keilaqtt · 3,325
#14
SmartSeven
@smartsevenv · 4,028
#15
Ралоди
@raloody · 7,981
#16
Кваказябрики
@maaminaas · 1,613
#17
milky
@m1l1ky · 14,503
#18
roundzz govorilka
@ya_roundzz · 2,248
#19
Skilly | Обучение от PRO | CS2, Dota 2
@skillypro · 6,697
#20
Cokit
@cokityt · 377
#21
Genadich
@GenadichValorant · 585
#22
pa1ka17
@pa1ka · 6,931
#23
Я съела kaogavi
@kaogavi · 1,217
#24
suy
@suygetssu · 4,138
#25
NEONONLY
@neononly · 2,769
#26
Demongaru✨🐾
@demongaru · 741
#27
d3nZ
@d3nZvlr · 3,508
#28
VATARI
@vatari999 · 18,842
#29
sonneidfc
@sonneidfc · 2,525
#30
nomodesty
@n0m0d3sty · 4,699
#31
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 267,921
#32
Пенная Вечеринка 🤡
@gromorez · 464
#33
НЕ ИНМАХЕР
@INMAHEART · 1,555
#34
Укротитель цЫпочек
@orionfogame · 953
#35
Стрим хата iVoLonD
@iVoLonDin · 1,073
#36
Мяу пупу
@mewtwoqq · 437
#37
VALORANT INFO | RIOT GAMES NEWS
@valorant_info · 95,912
#38
akash1vl
@akash1vll · 28,213
#39
VALORANT University | News
@VALORANT_University · 104,373
#40
VALORANT ESPORTS | VINFO
@esports_valorant · 11,426
#41
SAMURAJ
@samuraj_tg · 33,718
#42
nAts
@nAtstg · 9,621
#43
Espressedvlr [Название в разработке]
@sclvlr · 802
#44
асусасалка♡
@asusasalka · 5,197
#45
CYBERSLOVO
@cyberslovo · 41,097
#46
VALORANT University | Esports
@vlresports · 13,670
#47
HELLCR0SS
@hellcr0ss · 2,364
#48
ПОИСК ТИММЕЙТОВ | TEAM FINDER | VALORANT
@teamfinder · 15,997
#49
odinN
@odinn_tap · 13,682
#50
sadlyangel 🪽
@sadlyangel · 1,510
#51
rariwise 💤
@rariwise · 3,306
#52
Цирк чемпиона Москвы по валоранту куная
@kunai4ek_k · 316
#53
7SICK | VALORANT COACH
@sickcoach · 691
#54
леха атсуши
@atsushi993 · 1,133
#55
LaLYoUUUUU!
@lalyouq · 4,958
#56
tens9o 🎃
@tens9o · 884
#57
ИГРЫ ПК
@igry_na_pk_onlayn · 408,003
#58
Almighty9od %&@#/?!
@Almighty9ch · 2,287
#59
Recrent
@recrent · 230,901
#60
slowdance
@slwdnclive · 804
#61
Merxlly
@merxly · 3,694
#62
Loading… • Steam News
@LoadingSteam · 32,311
#63
🌑🌒🌔 Tengen 🌖🌘🌑
@tengeneo · 877
#64

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пивная Таверна
@sayjoshuatwitch · 20,032
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 October 2026
Данилка Бебо
@bebrosasi · 19,152
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 5 October 2026
Сигмы
@excusemebr0 · 30,212
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 6 September 2026
д’Антеньян
@dantevski · 18,810
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 October 2026
Lelush vi Britannia
@xLelush · 28,292
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 7 September 2026
ROUNDZZ
@roundzz · 82,815
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
SAMURAJ
@samuraj_tg · 33,718
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
Кейман l Валорант
@keymanvlr · 45,864
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 28 August 2026
lev7radiantvalorantprovlr
@levtvision · 63,163
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
akash1vl
@akash1vll · 28,213
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 September 2026
VALORANT University | News
@VALORANT_University · 104,373
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
VALORANT INFO | RIOT GAMES NEWS
@valorant_info · 95,912
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
Relaxcis
@relaxcis · 36,233
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Vir9ine | Valorant
@Vir9ine · 31,744
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 5 September 2026
Loading… • Steam News
@LoadingSteam · 32,311
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GirlK1d” (@girlk1d), 33,317 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/girlk1d.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.