Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Girl in the Block

Channel

Girl in the Block

@girlintheblock

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,125subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002064052041
TypeChannel
Username@girlintheblock
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/girlintheblock

Growth

1,1251,1471,13616 August 2026 — 1,147 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,146 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,143 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,136 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,130 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,125 subscribers16 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 23 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,122–1,150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 09:401,125-5
30 Aug 2026, 17:221,130-6
27 Aug 2026, 19:321,136-7
24 Aug 2026, 15:441,143-3
17 Aug 2026, 11:091,146-1
16 Aug 2026, 16:311,147first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 11 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🦄4432.6%
🐳2417.8%
🌚2317.0%
💯2317.0%
❤‍🔥2115.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2025 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jun 2026, 08:56 UTC266 viewsread 16 August 2026

В продолжение вчерашнего поста 🤪

12 Jun 2026, 08:55 UTC262 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

🤑Если крипта умрет, то всегда можно переключиться на азартные игры, например, на рулетку хомяков: Crypto Digest

🦄5

10 Jun 2026, 17:22 UTC236 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика «а что, если бы» 🤪 Топовая инвестиционная стратегия: На календаре - январь 2025. Берём $10 000. Покупаем крипту в день инаугурации Трампа. Ждём, пока рынок, политика, тарифы, мемкоины и дед с кепкой MAGA сами всё решат. Мы же тогда ещё верили в крипту, правда? На календаре - июнь 2026. PROFIT??? P.S. Для путешественников во времени: это не финансовая рекомендация 🤪 Скорее так… историческая реконструкция н

🦄5💯2🌚1🐳1

24 May 2026, 05:52 UTC241 views12 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Понимаю, что это не сильно актуально для большинства участников рынка 😁, но мало ли, мне показалось интересным. Пару лет назад криптан решил выйти из сумрака и красиво обелиться: задекларировал доходы с крипты на 34,5 млн рублей. Казалось бы: вот он, идеальный налогоплательщик. Где грамота? Где медаль? Где торжественное рукопожатие от ФНС? А... их нет 🐎 По версии следствия, в декларации были не только доходы, но и

🦄7💯3🌚1🐳1

22 May 2026, 14:38 UTC180 views12 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

С Bitcoin Pizza Day, дорогие криптаны 🤤🍕 Сегодня тот самый день, когда человечество в очередной раз вспоминает: иногда самая дорогая ошибка в жизни это не бывший, не кредит на айфон и даже не лонг альты на хаях- а две пиццы за 10 000 BTC. С одной стороны, хочется драматично схватиться за сердце и посчитать, сколько сейчас стоил бы каждый кусочек пепперони. С другой - если бы не тот легендарный голодный чел, мы бы,

🦄6❤‍🔥3🐳2🌚1

5 Mar 2026, 08:52 UTC419 viewsread 16 August 2026
Poll

А ты помнишь эту биржу?

  1. Да, участвовал/а в битвах трейдеров17%
  2. Да, торговал/а спредики на токене биржи AT17%
  3. Да, держал/а там три копейки8%
  4. Abcc? 🆗, бумер92%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Mar 2026, 08:44 UTC397 views8 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @maxynotesPhoto

Утренняя проверка на старость 👀

🦄6🐳2

12 Dec 2025, 08:11 UTC773 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

У меня тут хреновенькая новость - похоже, что bybit cards массово скомпрометированы 😵‍💫 Захожу сегодня на акк, который использую для мелких покупок-переводов и вижу, что какой-то 🐕 погулял на мои 29 баксов в клубе в Бразилии 😂😡 Обычно, при любой моей попытке как-то использовать карту - она сразу морозится байбитом - надо лезть в настройки, доказывать, что я это я. А тут с их стороны- 0% осуждения, 100% понимания, в

🌚5🦄4❤‍🔥2

3 Dec 2025, 05:40 UTC538 views13 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Как выглядит типичный криптан сегодня 🤡

🌚6💯4🦄2🐳1

19 Nov 2025, 08:27 UTC547 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю рубрику "кринжа навалили" 🤡 Пару дней назад самый умный типок в мире, с IQ 276, предсказал рост битка до 220 к за штуку за 45 дней. Ну а что такого, предсказал и предсказал, дэ? 3... 2... 1... Короче, сегодня он решил под этим соусом запустить свой баблосборник с очередным личным селебо-токеном🤣 IQ у него точно не 276... А вот рагпулом дело кончится 100% 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

💯5🌚4🐳1🦄1

18 Nov 2025, 13:34 UTC445 views10 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Апрельский гепчик-таки закрыли... Когда похожим образом закрыли ноябрьский - дали ещё одно ралли. Ну да, через месяц, ну да, по крайней мере на битке🦄 Не пора ли нам уже отскакивать, в самом деле-то 😹

🐳4🦄3💯2❤‍🔥1

31 Oct 2025, 18:47 UTC478 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Биток закрывался в минус в октябре всего дважды за свою историю. Главная загадка на сегодня - мы сейчас в 2014 и всё пока ок, или же в 2018 😵‍💫 Так или иначе, я пока без активных поз, чего и вам желаю 🤤

🐳4🌚3💯2🦄2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @girlintheblock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Mar 2026, 08:52 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

А ты помнишь эту биржу?

  1. Да, участвовал/а в битвах трейдеров17%
  2. Да, торговал/а спредики на токене биржи AT17%
  3. Да, держал/а там три копейки8%
  4. Abcc? 🆗, бумер92%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2025 to 12 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сад финансовой независимости
@Sad_finansovoi_nezavisimosti · 32,772
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 September 2026
По Земле бюджетно
@budzhetno · 43,659
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
Новостройки Ремонт Право
@novostroydom · 95,471
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Girl in the Block” (@girlintheblock), 1,125 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/girlintheblock.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.