Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 67 days, net +92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,013–13,178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 09:27
13,159
+15
9 Oct 2026, 06:59
13,144
+11
4 Oct 2026, 18:56
13,133
+18
27 Sept 2026, 00:59
13,115
-4
17 Sept 2026, 17:22
13,119
+25
15 Sept 2026, 16:36
13,094
+23
13 Sept 2026, 21:37
13,071
+4
12 Sept 2026, 01:56
13,067
-27
9 Sept 2026, 15:15
13,094
-12
6 Sept 2026, 05:17
13,106
+9
4 Sept 2026, 03:00
13,097
+13
2 Sept 2026, 15:34
13,084
+4
1 Sept 2026, 12:54
13,080
+21
31 Aug 2026, 09:43
13,059
+10
30 Aug 2026, 09:14
13,049
+7
29 Aug 2026, 12:28
13,042
+10
28 Aug 2026, 09:12
13,032
-6
27 Aug 2026, 10:23
13,038
-1
25 Aug 2026, 10:22
13,039
-5
24 Aug 2026, 13:48
13,044
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 48s
Average length
3m 48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
625 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
178
28.5%
💯
148
23.7%
👍
131
21.0%
✍
63
10.1%
⚡
32
5.12%
🤝
31
4.96%
😁
25
4.00%
👌
10
1.60%
🎉
7
1.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 625 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 26 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gipokratia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Цифровой рубль будет необязателен говорили они.... Что значит это на практике (скрин): каждый рубль будет учтен. Я очень сильно сомневаюсь, что к 30-му году кто-то сможет налом платить или по-серому. Просто учтите это в работе. Лучше заранее. Это больше к владельцам компаний относится, но отразится на всех в любом случае.
🏛Про рабочих и их отношение.
Часто в комментариях пишут: вы тут напроектировали, а как к этому отнесутся рабочие: сложно, делать не будут, пошлют.... И так далее в таком вот духе.
Вообще слышать такое очень странно, на самом деле. Разложу систему устройства вообще проектно-строительного процесса для понимания.
Есть нужда построить объект (здание или что-либо еще). Заказчик идет к проектировщику (компании) и тот ем…
Минстрой России в партнерстве с МГСУ разработал проект нового Свода правил "Сроки проектирования и нормы продолжительности строительства объектов капитального строительства. Методика расчета". Ссылки на этот документ пока нет, к сожалению. При этом технологии информационного моделирования остались в стороне от этого СП, что автоматически делает документ бессмысленным, т.к. модели то требуют от проектировщика. То есть…
4 типажа.
Есть 4 основных типажа ГИПов (мое субъективное исключительно, кто имеет другое видение на эту тему, пишите, обсудим в комментах).
1. ГИП-функция: это просто некий человек, который почему-то (непонятно почему) работает на должности ГИПа. Почему - вопрос второй. Это не так важно. Важно как он работает. А работает он просто: по заданию директора он выполняет механические действия по организации планеров, пер…
🛠Гибридные схемы подбора конструкций.
Базово расчеты и подбор конструкций делается расчетом последних "с нуля" и далее идет проектирование часто весьма индивидуальное. Конечно, типовые решения применяются, но их приходится подбирать вручную, пользуясь сериями.
Мы реализовали гибридный подход к расчетам. Все это собрано в нашем сервисе с расчетными модулями, многие из которых бесплатные.
🔸Итак, например узлы стальн…
💬Сидят два ГИПа на обеде в офисе на стройке и один другого спрашивает:
- Владимир Иванович, а скажи, ты помнишь какие сказки тебе бабушка перед сном в детстве рассказывала?
- Ты знаешь, бабушка работала тоже в строительстве и часто говорила "Будешь хорошо учиться, станешь ГИПом и будешь много денег зарабатывать."
🆕Минстрой опубликовал письмо от 13 апреля 2026 года № 8622-ОГ/08, в котором подробно разобрал правовой статус строительных субподрядчиков. Ведомство уточнило, что компании и индивидуальные предприниматели, привлекаемые к работам на условиях субподряда, не обязаны быть членами саморегулируемых организаций (СРО).
Согласно позиции Министерства, опирающейся на часть 2 статьи 52 Градостроительного кодекса РФ, обязательное…
🏛А вот раньше строили без этих всяких ваших расчетов и до сих пор стоит....
Именно такого смысла комментарии являются самыми массовыми: их пишет чуть ли не каждый третий.
Поясняю почему же все-таки расчеты нужны даже несмотря на то, что у кого-то до сих пор еще стоит... Итак, начнем с самых древних сооружений: например, пирамиды в Египте. Почему они без расчетов и до сих пор стоят:
- это максимально устойчивая форм…
💯12✍3👍3🤣3⚡1
Signed PRO-Z
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @gipokratia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Да, но только пилотные объекты пока и не полностью в BIM10%
Да, но только по разделам АР и КР13%
Нет, не применяется, пока только в планах14%
Нет, не применяется и даже не планируется20%
Не знаю6%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Проектирование зданий @prozru · 44,186 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ГИПократия” (@gipokratia), 13,159 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gipokratia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.