Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 44 days, net +132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,688–3,860 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 15:39
3,840
+4
15 Sept 2026, 08:16
3,836
+9
12 Sept 2026, 02:41
3,827
+42
2 Sept 2026, 17:38
3,785
-6
30 Aug 2026, 06:07
3,791
+3
26 Aug 2026, 21:54
3,788
-3
24 Aug 2026, 08:24
3,791
+11
20 Aug 2026, 05:22
3,780
+10
16 Aug 2026, 21:26
3,770
+4
13 Aug 2026, 03:44
3,766
+12
10 Aug 2026, 05:52
3,754
+35
6 Aug 2026, 19:37
3,719
+11
6 Aug 2026, 12:01
3,708
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,078 reactions across 21 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
380
35.3%
🔥
340
31.5%
✍
153
14.2%
👍
54
5.01%
custom 5249283929382344263
50
4.64%
👏
30
2.78%
❤🔥
18
1.67%
custom 5221935403002515642
17
1.58%
custom 5393348161966194546
7
0.649%
custom 5267197696808077117
6
0.557%
🙏
5
0.464%
🤣
5
0.464%
👌
4
0.371%
💔
3
0.278%
😨
2
0.186%
🥰
2
0.186%
custom 5281011299474491076
1
0.093%
🍾
1
0.093%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,078 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @giocondaitaliana. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Много лет назад, когда я только начала работать гидом по Петербургу с итальянцами, я заметила их особую цветочувствительность
🧡 Знаменитый Михайловский замок они называли «лососевым», а не розовым или оранжевым, как предлагала я
🩵 А Кунсткамеру - бирюзовой (il turchese, не путать с turco - турецкий) - не голубой и не зеленой
💚 Зимний дворец по итальянской версии - изумрудный, Смольный Собор - понятное дело - небес…
🇮🇹 Каждый раз, когда я рассказывала итальянцам про белые ночи в Петербурге, сталкивалась с недопониманием
Они думали, что я имею в виду не природное явление, а выражение:
passare una notte in bianco - провести ночь без сна 🛌
То есть для итальянского уха «белая ночь» сначала звучит как "бессонная ночь"
И тут начинается самое интересное. Оказалось, что изначально и в русском языке белая ночь могла означать именно «б…
🇮🇹 Какой у вас любимый учебник по итальянскому?
Вопрос для преподов: какая у вас сейчас «методическая корзина»?
Очень хочется вдохновений к новому учебному году, обычно я беру себе месяц на изучение новых пособий 🐶
Завидую коллегам, которые живут в Италии и могут сходить на презентации книг от всяких Alma edizioni, послушать, полистать да еще получить подарков
Пост про лучшие учебники по итальянскому я писала тут…
Проголосуйте, пожалуйста, за «Игристый итальянский», чтобы я могла добавить красивые итальянские сердечки в реакции 🐈
https://t.me/boost/giocondaitaliana
🇮🇹 🐕 Породы собак по-итальянски
Намеренно выписала те, которые имеют собственное итальянское название
Каждый раз мысленно проговариваю эти carlino, volpino e bassotto при встрече на улице
🐕 le razze di cani - породы собак
il pastore tedesco - немецкая овчарка
il barboncino - пудель
il bassotto - такса
il carlino - мопс
il dalmata - далматин
il samoiedo - самоед
il volpino - итальянский шпиц
il levriero - борзая
l…
🇮🇹 ЖИЛИЩНЫЙ ВОПРОС по-итальянски
Год назад публиковала отличный глоссарий на эту тему
🏠 Сейчас его можно дополнить видео, высокобелковым в плане лексики.
🤍 Спасибо моей ученице @aksanka113 за такую идею!
youtu.be/aoB1DY8WYlY?is=5r2l8g5BQPJph2Uf
👩🏻💻Новое интервью коллеги-переводчика из серии #жизньзамечательныхпереводчиков
Я уже поговорила с Ритой Ключак, Полиной Казанковой, Натальей Кольчугиной, Александрой Матрусовой, Иваном Чаплыгиным и Марией Зененко
А здесь я писала свою личную историю
Сегодня встречайте Викторию Волошину, 42 года, Москва @latraductora
Устный последовательный и синхронный переводчик 🇪🇸🇬🇧, автор канала
🤩 В 12 лет впервые попала в И…
🇮🇹 КЛАССНОЕ РАЗГОВОРНОЕ ВЫРАЖЕНИЕ
vedere di fare qc - попытаться, постараться, сделать так, чтобы получилось
⭐️Vedrò di arrivare in tempo - Я постараюсь прийти вовремя
⭐️Vedi di non fare tardi - Смотри не опаздывай
⭐️Vediamo di risolvere il problema - Попробуем решить проблему
⭐️Vedi di calmarti - Постарайся успокоиться
⭐️Vedrò di chiamarti domani - Я постараюсь позвонить тебе завтра
⭐️Vedrò di finire tutto en…
🔥36✍25❤8🙏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @giocondaitaliana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Итальянский язык / Italiano @italiano_russo · 38,167 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Итальянский по слову в день 🇮🇹 @italiano365telegram · 27,605 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Итальянский язык с Magnitalia. Практика с итальянцами. Онлайн и вживую в Италии. @magnitalia_ru · 34,976 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игристый итальянский 🇮🇹🥂” (@giocondaitaliana), 3,840 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/giocondaitaliana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.