Channel
@gillix20
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,795subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001205341434 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gillix20 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gillix20 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 4,795 | -21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 4,816 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 4,822 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (26 May 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 75 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
ولك الحمد حمدًا كثيرًا طيبًا مباركًا فيه، على جميع نعمك الظاهرة والباطنة، وعلى كل ما سهونا عن شكرك عليه ظنًّا منا أنه دائم أو معتاد، وهو في الحقيقة من رحمتك ولطفك وواسع كرمك يا الله. اللهم لك الحمد حتى ترضى، ولك الحمد إذا رضيت، ولك الحمد بعد الرضا
صدقه جاريه حمد بادي
https://t.me/hll19n
﴿ وَذَكِّرْ فَإِنَّ الذِّكْرَىٰ تَنفَعُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ ﴾ - أستغفر الله . - سُبحان الله . - الحمدلله . - الله أكبر . - لا اله الا الله . - اللهم صل وسلم على نبينا مُحمد . - لا حول ولا قوة الا بالله العلي العظيم . - سُبحان الله وبحمده سُبحان الله العظيم .
File, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
الأب نعمَـه ، وأنا يا الله من أشدّ الفاقدين اللهُّـمّ كن لأبي أنيسًا في قبره ، وكن به رحيمًا وأشمله بعفوك وإحسانك ومغفرتك يارب العالمين اللهُّـمّ ارحم أبي رحمةً تطمئن بها نفسه وتفسح له في قبره وتؤنس وحشته وترحم غربته اللهُّـمّ اجمعني به في جنات النعيم يا أرحم الراحمين .
اللهم إني أصبحت أُشهدك وأُشهدُ حملةَ عرشك وملائكتك وجميع خلقك أنك أنت الله لا إله إلا أنت وحدك لا شريك لك وأن محمدًا عَبدُكَ ورسولك.
اللهم أنت ربي لا إله إلا أنت، خلقتني وأنا عبدك وأنا على عهدك ووعدك ما استطعت، أعوذ بك من شرِّ ماصنعت أبوء لك بنعمتك علي وأبوء بذنبي فاغفر لي فإنه لايغفر الذنوب إلا أنت.
صدقة جارية لأبي وموتى المسلمين pinned «"وأجعل لي من بعد موتي أهلًا وأصحابًا وأحبة لا يهجرون وصلي بالدعاء يا الله"»
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gillix20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صدقة جارية لأبي وموتى المسلمين” (@gillix20), 4,795 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gillix20.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.