Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GiftFREI-Leben.de

Channel

GiftFREI-Leben.de

@giftfrei_leben

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,801subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001672330077
TypeChannel
Username@giftfrei_leben
Created23 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/giftfrei_leben

Growth

4,8014,8094,8056 August 2026 — 4,809 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,809 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,801 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,800–4,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:424,801-8
6 Aug 2026, 10:344,809no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:514,809first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.9%
avg views ÷ 4,801 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held21 (15 April 20269 August 2026)
Views total22,769
Reactions total164
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

263 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13250.2%
7829.7%
👏103.80%
👎62.28%
🔥51.90%
🍌41.52%
💯41.52%
😢41.52%
🙏41.52%
🥰41.52%
🤡31.14%
💅20.76%
🦄20.76%
👻10.38%
😁10.38%
😱10.38%
🙉10.38%
🥱10.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC649 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❓Wie viel Vertrauen hast du in Daten, deren Herkunft du nicht kennst? Ein aktueller Beitrag (siehe Link unten) diskutiert, dass ein Wetterdienst Daten aus Modellpunkten genutzt hat, die wie reale Messstationen wirken. Das Beispiel ist ein guter Anlass, eine systemische Frage zu stellen: 📌 Wie viele Entscheidungen in unserem Alltag basieren auf Daten, die nicht gemessen, sondern modelliert, geschätzt oder ergänzt wu

👍74🥰1😁1

4 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈3,580 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📌Nachtrag zu unserer Mängelanfrage an ALDI‑SÜD aufgrund unseres Verbraucherschutz-Beitrags "Biozide in Arbeitssocken" ALDI‑SÜD hat uns auf unsere Rückmeldung zu den „antibakteriellen“ Arbeitssocken wie folgt geantwortet: „Der Artikel ist vollumfänglich geprüft und verkehrsfähig. Der Wirkstoff wurde am 03.07.2026 auf die Liste für nicht genehmigte Wirkstoffe gesetzt. Für behandelte Waren gilt gemäß Biozidverordnung e

😢4👍2💅2💯1

1 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈1,300 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❓Warum wir solche Fälle systemisch betrachten Der Fund eines nicht genehmigten Biozids in Arbeitssocken ist kein Einzelfall, sondern ein Hinweis auf etwas Grundsätzliches: Verbraucher und Erzeuger treffen Entscheidungen oft unter Zeitdruck, mit unvollständigen Informationen und in komplexen Märkten, in denen viele Faktoren gleichzeitig wirken. Genau deshalb arbeiten wir bei Giftfrei Leben mit einer systemischen Si

👍3🔥2👏1🦄1

31 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC≈4,180 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️Biozid in Arbeitssocken entdeckt Heute brachte meine Frau Arbeitssocken von ALDI‑Süd mit – beworben als „antibakteriell“. Auf dem Etikett: ein Wirkstoff aus der Gruppe der Dimethyloctadecyl‑Verbindungen. Laut EU‑Durchführungsbeschluss (EU) 2026/1424 wurde dieser Wirkstoff nicht genehmigt, weil grundlegende Sicherheitsdaten fehlen: keine zuverlässigen Analysemethoden, unzureichende toxikologische Daten, keine Bewe

3👍3🔥3👎2😱1🙉1

30 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,280 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🙏Kurze Frage an alle gewerblichen Erzeuger (Bauern/Landwirte): Was belastet euch im Moment in eurem Betrieb am meisten? Ihr könnt einfach in eigenen Worten antworten – egal ob es um Preise, Bürokratie, Lieferketten, Energie, Zeitdruck, Auflagen oder etwas ganz anderes geht. 👉 Email: [email protected] Die Antworten helfen uns, die Lage der Betriebe noch besser zu verstehen und die Inhalte unserer Erzeuger‑Son

👍4👏21🍌1

28 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,420 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❗️Fehler auf Newsletter-Anmeldeseite beseitigt Gerade haben wir den Fehler auf unserer Newsletter-Anmeldeseite beseitigt: Nichtsichtbarkeit des Anmelde-Buttons bei manchen mobilen Endgeräten. Nun sollte die Newsletter-Anmeldung auf allen mobilen Endgeräten störungsfrei funktionieren. Wir bitten diese Störung zu entschuldigen.🙏 Falls andere Störungen auf unserer Website auftreten sollten, bitte einfach kurz per Em

👍1

28 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,490 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👥 Warum systemische Beiträge nicht nur Landwirtschaft betreffen — sondern uns alle. Viele unserer Themen wirken auf den ersten Blick wie reine Landwirtschaftsfragen. Doch sie betreffen jeden Haushalt, jede Familie und jeden Alltag. Systeme sind miteinander verbunden. Wenn Böden Stress haben, wenn Kreisläufe schwächer werden oder wenn Abhängigkeiten steigen, wirkt sich das nicht nur auf Betriebe aus — es wirkt sich

👍3🍌1

26 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,470 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💧 Wasserknappheit zeigt nicht nur das Wetter — sie zeigt die Speicherfähigkeit unserer Systeme. Viele Regionen erleben gerade Trockenheit, sinkende Grundwasserstände oder stark schwankende Niederschläge. Das wirkt wie ein reines Klima‑ oder Infrastrukturproblem. Doch der entscheidende Punkt ist: Wasserknappheit entsteht nicht nur durch fehlenden Regen, sondern durch fehlende Speicherfähigkeit. Ein Boden ist wie ei

4👍4🍌1🤡1🙏1

25 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,300 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rpnnewsPhoto

Eine kleine Bäckerei in Spanien hängt am Abend das unverkaufte Brot vor den Eingang, damit hungrige Menschen es einfach mitnehmen können – ohne zu fragen, ohne sich erklären zu müssen. In einer ruhigen Straße wurde aus einer ganz normalen Schließroutine eine stille Geste der Menschlichkeit. Statt übrig gebliebenes Brot wegzuwerfen, legt der Bäcker es draußen in einfache Stoffbeutel. Kein großes Schild, keine Belehru

31👍6👏2🥰2

25 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,090 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Impulse der Menschlichkeit - so etwas und ein direktes Miteinander zwischen Verbrauchern und Erzeugern bekommen wir Menschen in Mitteleuropa doch auch hin, oder? ➡️ Schau hier: https://t.me/giftfrei_leben/547 Alles Liebe, Dein Team 'Giftfrei-Leben.de' 👉Kanal beitreten und teilen...

16👍9🙏2🥰1

25 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,130 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚢 Globale Abhängigkeiten zeigen nicht nur die Welt — sie zeigen den Stress in unseren Versorgungssystemen. Wenn ein Schifffahrtsweg blockiert wird, ein Hafen stillsteht oder Energie knapp wird, wirkt das teils weit entfernt. Doch die Mechanik dahinter ist einfach: Systeme, die auf externe Inputs angewiesen sind, verstärken jeden Stress. Das betrifft Dünger (z.B. Stickstoffdünger), Energie, Transport, Futtermittel

👍4👻1🙏1

23 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,180 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🛒 Steigende Lebensmittelpreise zeigen nicht nur den Markt — sie zeigen den Kreislaufgrad unserer Systeme. Viele Menschen erleben gerade höhere Preise bei Obst, Gemüse, Milch und Grundnahrungsmitteln. Das wirkt wie ein reines Marktproblem. Doch der entscheidende Punkt ist: Preise steigen nicht wegen eines Ereignisses, sondern wegen der Struktur des Systems dahinter. Je niedriger der Kreislaufgrad, desto stärker wir

👍7👎31

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @giftfrei_leben. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 135,737 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GiftFREI-Leben.de” (@giftfrei_leben), 4,801 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/giftfrei_leben.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.