Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GIFT TIME

Channel

GIFT TIME

@gift_time

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,677subscribers

-2,779 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002442666094
TypeChannel
Usernames@gift_time @kliplar
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gift_time

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,67714,45613,066.56 August 202618 September 2026
64 measurements spanning 43 days, net -2,779. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,260–14,873 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:4011,677no change
18 Sept 2026, 12:1611,677-24
16 Sept 2026, 08:1911,701no change
16 Sept 2026, 02:2111,701-38
14 Sept 2026, 17:3711,739-2
14 Sept 2026, 05:4111,741-27
13 Sept 2026, 04:4111,768-23
12 Sept 2026, 12:4111,791-18
11 Sept 2026, 08:4011,809-25
10 Sept 2026, 13:1811,834-49
8 Sept 2026, 12:1511,883-29
7 Sept 2026, 11:3811,912-66
5 Sept 2026, 09:3711,978-9
4 Sept 2026, 15:1911,987-23
3 Sept 2026, 15:1812,010-12
3 Sept 2026, 00:3512,022-73
2 Sept 2026, 08:0412,095-11
1 Sept 2026, 20:1612,106-16
1 Sept 2026, 08:0912,122-11
31 Aug 2026, 18:4812,133first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.68%
avg views ÷ 11,677 subscribers
Avg views / post
781
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held87 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total6,244
Reactions total153
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

939 reactions across 84 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19921.2%
🤣15916.9%
😁11712.5%
🔥11111.8%
👏9510.1%
👍768.09%
🥰282.98%
👀232.45%
🗿232.45%
⚡181.92%
😭161.70%
🤝151.60%
❤‍🔥101.06%
💅101.06%
😨90.958%
🏆40.426%
💊40.426%
😇30.319%
🤯30.319%
🦄30.319%
11 further kinds131.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 939 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 87 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gift_time. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 87 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC452 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣12💅7❤5👀2⚡1🗿1🤝1😁1

1 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC685 views49 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣27😁11🔥4🗿4❤1👀1👍1

31 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC758 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🦅 GRAM WALLET ALLAQACHON TELEGRAMDA! Pavel Durov ma’lum qilishicha, Gram Wallet hozircha ayrim foydalanuvchilar uchun mavjud. Yaqin ikki hafta ichida u asta-sekin Telegram’ning milliardlab foydalanuvchilariga ham ochiladi. ℹ️ Hamyon orqali Gramsni to‘g‘ridan-to‘g‘ri chatlarda, deyarli rasm yuborgandek oson jo‘natish mumkin bo‘ladi. Kuniga dastlabki 5 ta o‘tkazma — komissiyasiz, keyingi o‘tkazmalar esa juda kichik …

❤3🔥2👀1👍1💊1🗿1😁1

31 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC878 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🎁 KUBOK $18 620 GA QAYTA SOTILDI Kecha tunda Algorithm Cup #29 14 000 💎 / $18 620 ga sotildi. ⏰ Bundan atigi 9 soat oldin aynan shu kubok 4 730 💎 / $6 480 ga sotib olingan edi. 🪙 Qayta sotishdan sof foyda — 9 270 💎 / $12 140! @GIFT_TIME

🔥3😁2❤1👀1👍1👏1💊1🗿1

30 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC831 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😂 DUROVNI QATTIQ ALDASHIBDI! Oxir-oqibat, 🎁 Kubok #7 ning o‘zi g‘olibdan atigi $6 800 ga sotib olingan. Shundan keyin esa Portals’da uni $20 000 ga soxta sotuv qilib ko‘rsatishgan! 🤩 Eng qizig‘i, bu savdoga Durovning o‘zi ham ishongan va hatto bu haqda post qilgan! @GIFT_TIME

🤣7❤6👀2👍1💯1🗿1😁1

30 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC758 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍃 YAXSHILANISHLAR KUZDA BO‘LADI! Ohuenko ma’lum qilishicha, endi giftlar uchun yaxshilanishlarni faqat kuzda kutish kerak. @GIFT_TIME

⚡3😁2🌚1👀1👍1👏1🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC832 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🎁 KUBOKNING BIRINCHI SOTUVI! Algorithm Cup #7 — 15 000 💎 / $20 400 ga sotildi! ✔️ Bu kubok bo‘yicha qayd etilgan birinchi savdo! @GIFT_TIME

👏4❤1👍1🥰1😁1😍1

28 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,050 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🏆 INTELLIGENCE CUP #1 Sun’iy intellekt olimpiadasida 1-o‘rinni egallagan Artyom Goroxov (@artem_to_agi) Pavel Durovdan Intelligence Cup #1 sovg‘asini olganini ma’lum qildi. ☄️ Hozircha kubok yaxshilanmagan holatda turibdi. @GIFT_TIME

👍4🔥3👏2❤1👀1🗿1🥰1😁1

28 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,030 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

👀 NEGA DUROV UNGA STARS YUBORISHNI TAQIQLADI? Avgust boshida Durovdan kepka olgan @allex foydalanuvchisi Pavelning e’tiborini qanday jalb qilishga harakat qilganini aytib berdi. U Durovni belgilab, hikoyalar joylagan va bir vaqtning o‘zida unga 50 Starsdan yuborib turgan. Natijada bunday yuborishlar soni 60 taga yaqin bo‘lgan. @GIFT_TIME

❤3🔥3😁3⚡1👍1👏1

26 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,330 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💸 MAYDA PULLARINGIZNI QOLDIRING Agar Pavel Durov yoki Roxman’ga Stars yuborishga harakat qilsangiz, sizga minimal yuborish miqdori ko‘rsatiladi. ⭐️ Durov uchun minimum — 11 250 Stars ⭐️ Roxman uchun minimum — 35 000 Stars 🎁 Shuningdek, bugundan boshlab Durov’ga @monk akkaunti orqali istalgan giftni yuborib bo‘lmaydi — Telegram xatolik ko‘rsatmoqda @GIFT_TIME

❤5🦄3👀2🔥2🗿2🤣2👏1💅1

25 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,400 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🤠 TEZKOR QO‘LLAR — TEZKOR FOYDA 📱 Yangi egasi noyob anonim raqam bo‘yicha 69 000 GRAMlik taklifni qabul qilib, $98 000 foydani qo‘lga kiritdi. 👂 Mish-mishlarga ko‘ra, sobiq egasi raqamni o‘zidan o‘zi sotib olayotgan ekan. Ammo raqamni qayta-qayta oldi-sotdi qilib, market komissiyalariga pul berishdan maqsad nima — tushunarsiz. 🎯 Sotuvchiga achinamiz, softer uchun xursand bo‘lamizmi? Yoki bunga ishonmaymizmi — balk…

❤3👍2🎄1👀1👏1🔥1😁1

25 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC≈1,240 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

​💥 Eng yangi premyeralar endi bir joyda! 🍿 ​Filmlar dunyosidagi eng so'nggi yangiliklar va eng yuqori reytingli kartinalarni topish endi juda oson. ​✨ Bizning bot afzalliklari: 🙂​Reklamalarsiz va ortiqcha kutishlarsiz ✔️​Barcha formatlar va sifatli tarjima 🇷🇺Rus tili, 🇺🇸Ingilis tili, 🇺🇿Uzbek tili mavjud 📌 ☄️​Qulay va tezkor qidiruv tizimi 🍿 ​Popkorningizni oling va haqiqiy kinomanlar safiga qo'shiling! 🎬 ​👉 F…

❤2👍1👏1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @gift_time. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GIFT TIME” (@gift_time), 11,677 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gift_time.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.