Natanim Share #40 What would any of you do if your dad makes a move on you? #Sexual #Harassment

Channel
ናታኒም
@gibigubae712
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
140subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003012092052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gibigubae712 |
| Description | "ናታኒም፤ የልብን ጭንቀት ለእግዚአብሔር በመስጠት የነፍስ እረፍትና መንፈሳዊ ፈውስ የሚገኝበት፣ ሚስጥር ጠባቂና ትሑት የልብ ማረፊያዎ።" "ጭንቀትዎን ወደ እረፍት የሚቀይሩበትና ልብዎን ለእግዚአብሔር ሰጥተው ሰላምን የሚያገኙበት መንፈሳዊ የልብ ሚስጥረኛ ወዳጅ እና ጓደኛ።" Bot link: @natanimbot_bot |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gibigubae712 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 140 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 140 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 72.5%
- avg views ÷ 140 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 102
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,030 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Natanim Share #39 So here`s the thing, I'm plagued with doubt, bout my faith. Not based off of some profound understanding of my faith , but solely based on the fact that our whole world as big and unjust as we know it, operating on a basis of Goodness, faith or some rule of morality. In the end tho, I fall back on "die believing than not." which in and of it self makes me into a non-believer, logically speaking. Or…
Natanim Share #38 i was checking mtsafkdus sletetsafebet gize and catholic yemikebelut metsaf kdus 73 endehone ayehu and we orintal orthodox (especially ethiopian orthodox) added around 8 books(መቃብያን ቀዳማዊ ena መቃብያን ካልዕ ketekoteru 10 books yihonalu )after that. And i was wondering why we added those books. And anbbeyachew alakm ena do they make real difference between us and catholics ? And catholicoch lemn ayikebel…
Natanim Share #37 Can I leave my husband if he rapes me? Cause like religiously it’s said u can only divorce if one cheats #Harassment #Religion
Natanim Share #36 How do orthodox Christians view marital rape? What do u guys think of this #Sexual #Family
Natanim Share #35 Do you think it's more important for the husband or the wife to be the more religious one? For a marriage to be happy #Religion #Family
Natanim Share #34 I saw a girl that was almost naked at a bar balefo , and now I can't get her out of my head. It's like my mind keeps going back to her . She torments me day and night in my head, how do I fight this and make it stop? #Sexual
Natanim Share #33 Zare neseha gebahu. Aba garm eyalekesku neber yetenazezkut. Kezia gen leloch sewoch endemilut neseha kegebahu behuala alkelelegnm. Yaskerehut negerm yelem gen wste ereft liyagegn alchalem. I.don't know the guilt kenonayenm chereshe bihon mikebdegn eyemeselegn new. Lmndnew #Religion #Repentance #Mental
Natanim Share #32 እግዚአብሔር አስቀድሞ ማን ቅዱስ እንደሚሆንና ማን እንደማይሆን ይመርጣል? ለምሳሌ በኤፌሶን 1፥4 "ዓለም ሳይፈጠር በፊት በእርሱ ቅዱሳንና ነውር የሌለብን እንድንሆን መረጠን" እና በሮሜ 8፥30 "አስቀድሞ የወሰናቸውን ጠራቸው፣ የጠራቸውንም አጸደቃቸው፣ ያጸደቃቸውንም አከበራቸው" የሚሉት ይህን የሚያሳዩ ይመስላሉ። ወይስ እኛም በፈቃዳችን እግዚአብሔርን መምረጥና በእርሱ ለመኖር ትጋት ማድረግ ይኖርብናል? ለምሳሌ 2 ጴጥሮስ 1፥10 "ጥሪያችሁንና ምርጫችሁን ለማረጋገጥ ይበልጥ ትጉ" ይላል። እነዚህ ሁለት እውነቶች እንዴት አብረው ይገባሉ? እግዚአብሔር መጀመሪያ ይመርጠናል? ወይስ እኛ እንመርጠዋለን? ወይስ ሁለቱም በአንድ ጊዜ …
Natanim Share #31 Do u believe in dreams? Ik am not a “tsadk” person but I do, I think God speaks to me through it #Spiritual
Natanim Share #30 tmhrt yikedma mamen? So i used to think i would never date a man out of my faith lebzu gize gn i met this guy idk when but we became couples. So now things got bit out of control we started to be intimate and i started feeling bad i dont want to ruine what we have and at the same time i care alot abt making God sad (kebzu mweta kalmeselegn chgroch wst awttognal) so i talked to my bf abt our relig…
Natanim Share #29 Okay so i have a boyfriend whom i really love but i think in relationship not being intimate is hard i mean we tried to be less intimate coz egzabhern silmiysazenew so my question is how can you make ur relationship to be with God and the other thing egzabher kefkede we want to have our wedding be teklile eventho we didn't lose our virginity we sometimes cross some boundaries as i think i mean we d…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gibigubae712. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,122,382 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ናታኒም” (@gibigubae712), 140 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gibigubae712.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.