Channel photo updated

Channel
Guidance, Support & stories
@giaifs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,170subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001717045160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @giaifs |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 4 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/giaifs |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 2,170 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 2,171 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 2,173 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 2,174 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 2,177 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 2,177 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,117 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 754 | 67.5% | |
| 👍 | 163 | 14.6% | |
| 🔥 | 78 | 6.98% | |
| 👏 | 37 | 3.31% | |
| 🥰 | 35 | 3.13% | |
| 😢 | 26 | 2.33% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 0.985% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.448% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.358% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.358% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2022 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Fun fact: In Russia, Christmas is NOT celebrated on December 25. In fact, Christmas is celebrated on January 7. It is because Russia follows a different calendar. In Russia we have дед мороз (father frost) who gives presents to everyone. He is accompanied by his granddaughter Снегурочка (snow maiden) ! I used to call her Elsa before I got to know her real name. Today, we had Christmas celebrations. 🎉 Счастливого Р…
❤39👏23👍8🔥3👌1
Merry Christmas
❤33👍5🥰5🔥4👏1
January 1, 2024 I remember the last time I did this, it was in 2020 and we all remember how that went ( Anyway, there’s always hope till there is hope. My emojis do not have the eyes -semicolon, colon etc- anymore because that is how people text in Russia. I asked a few friends and they said that Russians prefer this because there is no fear of it becoming an actual emoticon face -picture- . Russians do not believe…
❤67👍15🥰5💯3🤔3🔥1
Channel photo updated
Happy new year 2024 🎉
❤44🔥6💯2🥰1
Hoping that all of you are working hard 💖
❤126🔥12🥰10👍4👏4👌1
❤️❤️❤️
❤176👍13🔥10👏7🥰3👌2
First day in LBSNAA ❤️
🔥37❤14😱2
Way to LBSNAA ❤️ #lbsnaacalling #lbsnaa #ifs #upscmotivation #upsc https://www.instagram.com/reel/ChsMCazj5Bh/?igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=
❤8👍1
LBSNAA and beyond I am happy to inform you all that tomorrow I will be reaching mussoorie and reporting at LBSNAA. I invite all of you to be a part of my journey and will be sharing snippets of how everything unfolds. The schedule for the next 4 days is tight. The days include Unpacking luggage Document submission Fitness and medical test Laptop check up Orientation Various interactions Given the schedule, I have…
❤92👍32🥰6
Hello everyone! If there are any Mains specific doubts then you can ask them. I will try to answer the relevant ones. In terms of do s and don't s, I do not feel I have any novel ideas. It's pretty much the same things that everyone else talks about. I would be okay to repeat the same if required, let me know. All the best, keep studying 🧐👍
👍24🥰5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @giaifs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Feel the need to look at the questionnaire?
- Yes77%
- No5%
- Maybe5%
- Later (after Mains)12%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2022 to 31 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@becoming_ias_super_simplified · 39,188
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
@mycareerfeed · 29,275
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Guidance, Support & stories” (@giaifs), 2,170 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/giaifs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.