Channel
@ghuhvffu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,157subscribers
+150 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003985421431 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghuhvffu |
| Created | 19 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghuhvffu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 3,157 | +149 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 3,008 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 3,007 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 3,007 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 312 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 77.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 22.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢深蓝放映室 📢巨乳少女萝莉 📢动漫聚宝盆 📢广州佛山高端，江门中山9... 📢【夜鹰 数据】九年老料商... 📢日综|变态|搞笑|日韩综... 📢私藏影像社 📢资源导航中心|新闻导航|... 📢#吉隆坡外围 🔥 #吉... 📢利博代理 利博官网 利博... 📢人妻女友的秘密㊙️频道 📢币圈新闻|即时快讯 📢热点新闻 刑事犯罪🌎 📢国际新闻|吃瓜新闻|突发... 📢日本AV无码视频（1） 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 🥇西湖娱乐城✅老品牌包出款✅出款超10亿U ✅东南亚大事件✅柬埔寨大事件✅东南亚新闻 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 📢⚽️注册送138🧧百家乐/棋牌/电竞体育信誉平台 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速增长。
🇭🇰港股 下支票号已定，下周一开始进场，需要绩效配合的来🤟🤟🤟
❤2👍1
01703以顺利完成交收，下一支港股时间已定，有量的来🫵🫵🫵
01703今天最后一天 开盘市价买进，立马叫客户倒挂出来，当天结算。
1703已经开始挂单，欧美客户也可挂单，只要你的券商能进，提前挂单周三倒挂，周三打最后一棒不用倒挂，当天清，速度
1703已经开始挂单，欧美客户也可挂单，只要你的券商能进，提前挂单周三倒挂，周三打最后一棒不用倒挂，当天清，速度
通知 🇭🇰01703周一进场，价格已出。有量的来拿价格 @xfacai99
👍3
🇭🇰港股01703今晚确定做不做，美股下周一正常开 当天结算完。@xfacai99
👍3
🇭🇰港股 01703 周一开始进 预计周三倒挂 🇺🇸美股杀票 随时有 手里有港美的量想要变现的来👆 财神联系方式:@xfacai99
科技量来谈，市场点位最高，同台，当天结算🫵🫵🫵 财神联系:@xfacai99
科技量来谈，市场点位最高，同台，当天结算🫵🫵🫵 财神联系:@xfacai99
🇭🇰港股 01703 今天可以进下周一倒挂出来 🇺🇸美股杀票 随时有 手里有港美的量想要变现的来👆 财神联系方式:@xfacai99
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ghuhvffu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 310,712 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ghuhvffu named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“港美一手票房，同台进票，绩效配合，当天结算。” (@ghuhvffu), 3,157 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghuhvffu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.