Channel
@ghostwanttobelieve
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003873234206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghostwanttobelieve |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 12 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghostwanttobelieve |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 40 | -1 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 41 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 42 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 38 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 39 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 40 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 40 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 29.0% | |
| custom 5305726199153052669 | 12 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5305291741736225324 | 10 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5456532336390716749 | 10 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5305501396269811532 | 6 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5238107501060168595 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5305637559617997415 | 1 | 1.61% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда-то я быль новичок, потом смешарик, а теперь шизофреник 🖤 😗🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😚 Акварель - как взрослая самодостаточная женщина с огромным доходом, ей можно только подчиняться #традишка
custom 53055013962698115324custom 52381075010601685951custom 54565323363907167491
Наконец-то закончиль 🤩 На день позже, но лучше поздно чем никогда)… Хороший тамада и конкурсы интересные, буду продолжать осваивать анимацию, есть у меня идейки ⭐ Но хочу заранее предупредить что следующие несколько недель буду слать сюда в основном традишку, т.к. экзамены у меня художественные… ⭐ #анимация #диджитал
custom 52381075010601685951custom 53057261991530526691custom 54565323363907167491
Я не маюсь фигнёй и оч извиняюсь за отсутствие 😶 Меня опять взяли в рабство академического рисунка, а теперь ещё и вступительных экзаменов… Но полную анимацию на этой неделе выпущу, вопреки 😎 #традишка #почиркушки
custom 53057261991530526695custom 53052917417362253241custom 53055013962698115321custom 53056375596179974151
Теперь по кадровая анимация 🤩 Блин, мне так нравилось нажимать кнопочки в настройках и бац, моделька сама двигалась, были времена 👍 Опять новое приложение и новые возможности)… Не знаю как я до этого додумалься, но это типа глаза будут 👀 возможно, что-то ещё, но я вам не скажу 🤩 #анимация #диджитал
custom 53052917417362253243
Я как-то говориль, что когда-нибудь помучаюсь анимацией, воть и намучалься 🌟 Хоть она, возможно, и не кажется особо сложной, но это было сложно: новая деятельность в новом приложении… Опять десятилетние информатики с ютуба выручили 🖤 Ставьте реакции и обратите внимание на его рот 🤩 #диджитал #анимация #ониме
custom 54565323363907167492custom 53057261991530526691
Если бы я быль якудза, то отрезаль бы себе мизинец в знак извинений за отсутствие 🖤 Моё здоровье по шаталось, как алкаш после финального стаканчика, но сейчас всё вроде норм 🫠 Возвращаюсь с традишкой, и это не просто акварель, а акварель на слэйной бумаге из 100% хлопка 😺 Ладно, согласьн - бумага хорошая, но куда-то делся мой любимый хардкор… #диджитал
custom 54565323363907167492custom 52381075010601685951
Не умер он в конце драйва)… 🤩 Почему бы не сделать первый пост про аниме, о моём первом просмотренном аниме?) Л — логика И нет, не классика Хаяо Миядзаки, о нём я узналь позже (да, да я быль почти что в бункере) ⏳ 🦴«Ангел кровопролития»🦴 Сквозь время думаю, как же сюжет этого аниме похож на игру «Сайлент Хилл 2», только вместо города, многоэтажка (к слову, ангелочек по игре создан, но я позерь, не играль…) Не хочу сп…
custom 53057261991530526692custom 54565323363907167492
🌟🌟🌟🌟✍️💬💬💬🌟 #ониме #манга #кинематограф #gamерство #анимация #традишка #диджитал #свет_белый #почиркушки
custom 53052917417362253243
Video, posted without a caption
custom 53052917417362253242
Ну ладно, то немного не мой обычный стиль, там даже немного фон есть, да как я посмель)… 🎴 Поэтому версия в стиле Иван Гая у меня тоже есть 🤩 Может даже на аву канала это поставлю, если дадите реакцию 😉
custom 53052917417362253241custom 53055013962698115321custom 53057261991530526691
Video, posted without a caption
custom 53057261991530526692
😁😆😁 Скаким анимационным персонажем вы бы могли себя ассоциировать? Я: да) 😎
custom 54565323363907167492
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ghostwanttobelieve. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ghostwanttobelieve named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【𝙻_𝚆𝚎𝚗_𝚗𝚘_𝚂𝚔𝚢⟧ 天の予言” (@ghostwanttobelieve), 40 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghostwanttobelieve.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.