Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MSS Hauling

@ghareer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,027subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002053920699
TypeChannel
Username@ghareer
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ghareer

Growth

1,0241,0271,025.58 August 2026 — 1,025 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,027 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,024–1,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:351,027+3
8 Aug 2026, 16:021,024-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:471,025first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.7%
avg views ÷ 1,027 subscribers
Avg views / post
552
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (22 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total8,827
Reactions total397
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

397 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53438742790647520225914.9%
custom 52201665464914596395814.6%
👍5213.1%
custom 5285361500049910055287.05%
276.80%
🤝246.05%
🏆235.79%
custom 5220195537520711716174.28%
💯164.03%
custom 5199658498559854923153.78%
custom 5334544901428229844153.78%
🎉133.27%
custom 5197434882321567830102.52%
🕊92.27%
🤯92.27%
82.02%
custom 522204464120072056271.76%
custom 544764488082418107341.01%
custom 522017254656077183120.504%
custom 522209706127656653110.252%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
430
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 16 we hold a reading for · 63%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ghareer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC452 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍6custom 53438742790647520226💯4custom 51996584985598549234custom 52201665464914596392

5 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC427 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✏️ ONE TRIP. 9 CARS. $14,825.00 GROSS. From California to North Carolina, this 3,167-mile trip delivered a strong $4.68 RPM. The trip took 10 days because the driver spent additional rest time at home, followed by four days of downtime for truck repairs after a tire blowout. Coast to coast — loaded with results. 👥 @ghareer 👥 @mssmarket #carhauling

👍4💯3🤝31

1 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC559 views17 reactions30 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

WEEK 30 🥺 Three machines. One merciless tide. 🏆 #1 GOLD — $15,347.21 | $5.15 RPM 🥈 #2 SILVER — $13,326.65 | $4.10 RPM 🥉 #3 BRONZE — $13,155.86 | $4.30 RPM 🏁Week 30 proves it again: when the waves rise, only the strongest stay ahead. A small note: The visuals are fictional. The performance figures are real. ⬅️ Previous Top 👥 @ghareer 👥 @mssmarket #TopThree

custom 52201955375207117165🤝4custom 5220166546491459639311🏆1custom 52853615000499100551custom 53438742790647520221

1 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC486 views13 reactions30 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Weekly Comparison: Week 30 vs. Week 29 🌱 Gross: $10,302.18 ↑ from $9,585.80 (+7.47% ▲) 🌱 Miles: 2,381.00 ↑ from 2,290.34 (+3.96% ▲) 🌱 RPM: $4.38 ↑ from $4.25 (+3.06% ▲) 🔴 Week 30 marked a solid rebound, with all three key metrics improving over the previous week. Gross climbed by 7.5%, supported by both increased mileage and a stronger revenue per mile. The improvement was well balanced. Drivers covered nearly 4%

👍63🤝1custom 51974348823215678301custom 53345449014282298441custom 53438742790647520221

29 Jul 2026, 22:00 UTC679 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$18,062.67 in just one week with a 40% driver split! We break down the full math in the video. 🎬 Watch now! 👥 @ghareer 👥 @mssmarket

custom 522016654649145963910custom 52201955375207117165🏆4custom 519743488232156783032🤝2custom 53345449014282298442custom 53438742790647520222

29 Jul 2026, 21:57 UTC664 views45 reactions40 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 522016654649145963914custom 534387427906475202212🎉6custom 52220446412007205624custom 52853615000499100553💯2👍1🤝1

29 Jul 2026, 01:04 UTC652 views27 reactions18 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥ONE LOAD. 12 CARS. $18,040.00 GROSS. From North Carolina to California, this 3,402-mile run delivered a powerful $5.30 RPM. A strong result built on smart planning, professional driving, and solid execution. Coast to coast — loaded with results. 👥 @ghareer 👥 @mssmarket #carhauling

🤯6👍53🏆3custom 52201955375207117163custom 52853615000499100553custom 51996584985598549232custom 52201665464914596392

29 Jul 2026, 00:31 UTC517 views21 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 GOOD GROSS DOESN’T ALWAYS MEAN GOOD PROFIT In Week 28, only 2 of MSS’s 4 trucks were fully operational, resulting in 50% fleet downtime. Both active trucks exceeded the $10,607 #WeeklyAverage, generating $23,084.81 in total gross. However, expenses reached $22,517.74, including $5,500 in repairs, leaving only $567.07 in net profit 📉. The gross performance was strong, but downtime and high operating costs absorbed

custom 52853615000499100556custom 534387427906475202232💯2🤝2custom 52220446412007205622custom 53345449014282298442🕊1

27 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTC562 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

✨ Not one truck. Not one driver. This is the power of a team. Our Amazon team drivers delivered an outstanding result in Week 29: 🔴 Gross: $20,150.95 🔴 RPM: $3.39 🔴 Miles: 5,941 When team driving works right, the results hit differently 🔥. 👥 @ghareer 👥 @mssmarket #TeamDrivers

👍7custom 53438742790647520227🤝3custom 52853615000499100553💯21custom 52201665464914596391custom 52201955375207117161

27 Jul 2026, 03:49 UTC511 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Weekly Comparison: Week 29 vs. Week 28 🌱 Gross: $9,585.80 ↓ from $10,607.04 (-9.63% ▼) 🌱 Miles: 2,290.34 ↓ from 2,418.48 (-5.30% ▼) 🌱 RPM: $4.25 ↓ from $4.44 (-4.28% ▼) 🌡 Week 29 softened compared to the previous week, with all three key metrics posting moderate declines. Gross slipped by 9.6%, driven by both fewer miles and a slight reduction in revenue per mile. While the drop was noticeable, the performance re

👍5custom 53438742790647520225custom 533454490142822984443🤝2custom 52201725465607718312custom 51996584985598549231custom 52220446412007205621

27 Jul 2026, 02:29 UTC498 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

WEEK 29 🥺 Three machines. One brutal finish. 🏆 #1 GOLD — $11,843.76 | $3.95 RPM 🥈 #2 SILVER — $11,435.31 | $4.13 RPM 🥉 #3 BRONZE — $10,727.34 | $5.06 RPM 🏁Week 29 proves it again: the road may break apart, but the strongest never lose position. A small note: The visuals are fictional. The performance figures are real. ⬅️ Previous Top 👥 @ghareer 👥 @mssmarket #TopThree

custom 52201665464914596395custom 53438742790647520224🎉3🏆3👍3🤝211

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ghareer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 402,718 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MSS Hauling” (@ghareer), 1,027 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghareer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.