Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قلب زیبا ❤🍃

Channel

قلب زیبا ❤🍃

@ghalbeziba

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,676subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001287781670
TypeChannel
Username@ghalbeziba
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ghalbeziba

Growth

8,6598,6768,667.56 August 2026 — 8,659 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,659 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,662 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,660 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,676 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,656–8,679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:518,676+16
12 Aug 2026, 13:548,660-2
9 Aug 2026, 22:218,662+3
6 Aug 2026, 22:528,659no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:358,659first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.39%
avg views ÷ 8,676 subscribers
Avg views / post
207
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held51 (30 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total10,581
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2357.5%
🥰717.5%
💔410.0%
👎37.50%
😢37.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@ghalbeziba❤️✅ از وقتی یاد میگیری برای خودت زندگی کنی و کاری رو انجام بدی که واقعاً دوستش داری، انگار دنیا هم کم‌کم باهات هماهنگ میشه. قضیه خیلی ساده‌تر از چیزیه که فکر می‌کنیم؛ وقتی دلت و عقلت با هم درگیر نباشن و کنار هم باشن، خیلی از اتفاقا خودشون درست میشن و زندگی آروم‌آروم روی روال می‌افته.

12 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC48 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@ghalbeziba❤️✅ آدمها بالاخره یک روزی یک جایی، در یک لحظه تمام میشوند...! نه که بمیرند، نه جوهر احساسشان تمام می شود... ناظم حکمت

12 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC48 viewsread 12 August 2026

مادرانی که زیاد گلایه می‌کنند و زود عصبانی می‌شوند، معمولا کمبودِ محبت و قدردانی از جانبِ همسر دارند...

12 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC61 viewsread 12 August 2026

@ghalbeziba❤️✅ آدمهایی که فهمیده می‌شوند بی آنکه هزار بار خودشان را شرح دهند ‌. بی آنکه هزار بار متهم شوند . بی آنکه مجبور باشند برای توضیح غصه شان هوار بکشند ،خوشبخت ترین ها هستند . تنهایی به مقیاس آدم‌های اطراف تان نیست به مقیاس تعداد آدمهایی ست که برای فهماندن خودتان به آنها نیاز به فریاد زدن ندارید. و بعضی های ما بسیار تنهاییم. عادله زمانی

12 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC63 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@ghalbeziba❤️✅ ما رو زخم‌ها ساختن، نه نوازش‌‌ها.

12 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC71 viewsread 12 August 2026

@ghalbeziba❤️✅ #درس_امروز🔖 چیزایی كه در شأن تو نیست، رو به اسم صبر و فداکاری تحمل نکن. تو قرار نیست فدا بشی. شکوهت رو حفظ کن.

12 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC59 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Quran_womenFile

🍃🌸🍃🌸🍃🌸🍃🌸 ▪️ آیه ی(۹)، سوره ی حشر ▪️مدت زمان ؛ ۹ دقیقه فرزانه اسحاقی #تفسیرسوره_حشر 🌐https://t.me/Quran_women 🍃🌸🍃🌸🍃🌸🍃🌸

11 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC47 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @goLbarg_Tab

══ ⭕️ ══ ❥ ♦️ آمـوزش‌های رایـگــان متافیـزیــک ◉ ManMHastam 🔺🔺

11 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC100 viewsread 12 August 2026

یا رب ..اخلاص و قلبی پاک نصیبِ همه ما بگردان. و در دنیا و آخرت ،عاقبتمان را به خیر فیصله کن ..

11 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC108 viewsread 12 August 2026

@ghalbeziba❤️✅ به خانه‌ی کسی می‌روید و می‌بینید چاه فاضلابش گرفته، و او مشغول تخلیه‌ی آن با کاسه است، و به مهارتش می‌نازَد. خوب که دقت می‌کنید، می‌بینید که کاسه‌اش از طلاست، و مُزیّن به گوهرهای گران‌بها. چه حالی به شما دست می‌دهد که کاسه‌ای از طلا، در میان خلا، به‌دست ابلهی نادان است؟ این مثالی‌ست که مولانا در فصل دوم از کتاب "فیه ما فیه" می‌زند (با کمی تصرف). او می‌گوید، این مثال، داستانِ زندگی بیشترِ ما آدمیان

11 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC103 viewsread 12 August 2026

تحمل درد بهتر از موندن توی یک توهمه. :)

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @ghalbeziba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,073,776 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قلب زیبا ❤🍃” (@ghalbeziba), 8,676 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghalbeziba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.