#晓璇 #ins极品高颜博主 ins极品高颜博主 晓璇 与前男友性爱视频流出 大尺度调教猛干 女神形象彻底崩塌 看视频🌏 传送门 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7

Channel
东南亚/吃瓜/搞笑曝光
@ggyifan88
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,584subscribers
-9,418 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001553677078 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ggyifan88 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ggyifan88 |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 23,584 | +10,691 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 12,893 | -202 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 13,095 | -4,914 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 18,009 | -5,484 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 23,493 | -2,171 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 25,664 | -3,603 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 29,267 | -903 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 30,170 | -334 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:24 | 30,504 | -1,558 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 32,062 | -764 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 32,826 | -116 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 32,942 | -60 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 33,002 | first reading |
Engagement
135 posts held, back to 29 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.061%
- avg views ÷ 23,584 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14.4
- 135 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 25.0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 135
- of 135 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 135 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 135 (29 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,946 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 59m
- Average length
- 1m 27s
Measured directly from 82 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
保养一下嫩腿 无不良引导 #恋足 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
#女性力量 #打男人 男子被女友家暴,遭遇分手困难!无奈报警说被女友盗窃和猥亵 #家暴 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
台球室这么乱的吗 性压抑 饥渴 #台球室 #台球 想插了 ? 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
#仙女美丽时刻 评孙宇晨景甜事件:如果你和女生确定了操逼关系,然后你们一起去玩但是女生发的照片里面都没有你,那你大概率是舔狗。 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
越南学生拿着刀砍人 听说因为沉迷游戏,一个小学生偷了全校的东西,10人受伤-至少4名学生重伤 #刀仔 #砍人 #学生 #学校 #彻底疯狂 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
China GT发生重大赛道事故,91号车手赛车剧烈撞击后迅速起火,车队发文:91号车手是被79号不顾自身安危救出,赛事方至今未就救援不力致歉 #赛车 #比赛 #车祸 #烧车 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
#补充 #原来是他 全网 18 万粉丝,年仅 43 岁的有钱网红 Tiny,被确认在泰国接受鸡鸡增大手术后去世。 他今年 3 月跟老婆去泰国玩,顺路在曼谷一家诊所,打针做阴茎增大。而就在手术后不久,他在酒店按摩时出现胸痛并两次昏厥。 虽紧急抢救超过 100 分钟进行心肺复苏,但仍于 3 月 6 日凌晨去世,而死因确认为阴茎填充手术,引发的肺栓塞,相当于填充物跑进血管,把肺的血管堵住了。 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
#宁德时代 #蕉城 #任雨婷 宁德时代蕉城,任雨婷、李珂林事件。 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
这下大家的信息全在裸奔了。美国 FBI 确认,正调查一起全美居民信息泄露事件,原因是这几天暗网,出现 1.53 亿人的驾照信息被售卖。 甚至包括美国国防部长 Pete Hegseth,他本人的驾照记录也能被查询。而黑客声称,他们是从一家身份验证公司,持续偷取一年多的数据。 为了确认这些信息真假,不少持有美国驾照的人,跑去查询自己,结果还真能搜到,甚至包括了自己曾经的出行记录。 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
❤1
广东人最爱的白丝袜超长双马尾 💚💚 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
今天国内互联网传的沸沸扬扬的 “传位于马斯克” 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @ggyifan88 投稿:@qsjt_7
Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @ggyifan88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚/吃瓜/搞笑曝光” (@ggyifan88), 23,584 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ggyifan88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.