Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

윤과장 주식공부방

@ggulefather

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,564subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001160791903
TypeChannel
Username@ggulefather
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ggulefather

Growth

1,5641,5681,5667 August 2026 — 1,568 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,568 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,566 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,564 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,563–1,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:341,564-2
11 Aug 2026, 16:351,566-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:441,567-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:181,568no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:321,568first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.0%
avg views ÷ 1,564 subscribers
Avg views / post
406
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.312%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,119
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
888.9%
👍111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupinPhoto

미국 경제가 2020년 팬데믹 이후 세 번째로 큰 규모의 월간 일자리 감소를 예상치 못하게 기록하면서, 9월 금리 인상 확률이 40%로 하락 (불과 며칠 전만 해도 시장은 9월 금리 인상 가능성을 70% 이상으로 예상)

7 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC320 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

다행히 잘 나왔네요. 1,2분기 연속 흑전이네요.

6 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC417 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

사조시스템즈가 지난번이 이어 또 사조산업 지분을 늘렸네요. 큰 금액은 아니지만 지난번에는 4만원에, 이번엔 4만 중반대에도 추가매수한 점 참고하시기 바랍니다.

6 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC410 viewsread 7 August 2026

[ESG Issue Comment] 주가누르기 방지법, 무엇이 달라졌나? (8/6) 미래에셋증권 유건호 📉 2026년 세제개편안 속 주가누르기 방지법 재정경제부 8월 3일 발표. 이소영 의원(민주당)이 주도해온 '주가누르기 방지법' 포함 ① 문제 — 상장·비상장 간 상속세 격차 - 상장사: 전후 2개월 종가 평균, 상·하한 없음 - 비상장사: 순손익·순자산가치 혼합 + 순자산가치 80% 하한 - 같은 회사라도 상장돼 있으면 주가를 낮게 유지할수록 절세에 유리 ② 해법 — 두 안의 접근 차이 ▪️ 세제개편안: 2개 요건으로 추정  - (A) 최근 13반기 중 12반기 PBR이 업종별 하위 25%(코스피)·10%(코스닥)  - (B) 최근 1년 내 중복상장·EB 발행 등 + 주가 30% 이상 하락  - 해당할 경우 시가 기반 평가방법 적용,

5 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC434 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @darthacking

2026.08.05 17:20:03 기업명: SK하이닉스(시가총액: 1,218조 4,613억) A000660 보고서명: 풍문또는보도에대한해명(미확정) 보도내용 : [한국경제] SK하이닉스 美 자회사 솔리다임, 5조 규모 프리IPO 추진 발생일자 : 2026-08-05 해명내용 : 본 공시는 2026년 8월 5일자 한국경제에 보도된 "SK하이닉스 美 자회사 솔리다임, 5조 규모 프리IPO 추진" 기사에 대한 해명 공시(미확정) 입니다. - 당사의 해외 종속회사인 솔리다임은 경쟁력 강화를 위하여 다양한 방안을 검토하고 있으나, 현재까지 확정된 사항은 없습니다. - 추후 구체적인 내용이 확정되는 시점 또는 1개월 이내 재공시 하겠습니다. (공시책임자) 김우현 재무 부문장 재공시 예정일 : 2026-09-04 공시링크: https://

1

5 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC466 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

내일, 모레 실적발표 일정입니다.

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ggulefather. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“윤과장 주식공부방” (@ggulefather), 1,564 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ggulefather.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.