Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 荷包蛋🍳(课程表

Channel

荷包蛋🍳(课程表

@gfvjyf

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

970subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003242709569
TypeChannel
Username@gfvjyf
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gfvjyf

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

95197196126 August 2026 — 951 subscribers27 August 2026 — 956 subscribers4 September 2026 — 971 subscribers12 September 2026 — 968 subscribers24 September 2026 — 970 subscribers97026 August 202624 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 29 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 948–974 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 22:17970+2
12 Sept 2026, 07:36968-3
4 Sept 2026, 14:17971+15
27 Aug 2026, 13:53956+5
26 Aug 2026, 22:45951first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026

老师:荷包蛋 地区: #闵行 19 166/47kg 36C 课程:陪浴,舌吻,臀推,胸推,指划,漫游,舔🥚,吹箫,口爆,69,按摩,爱爱,各种姿势配合 $: 800p 50min 1500pp 90min 夜4500/9小时 不限次 联系:@hebaodanyy 频道:https://t.me/gfvjyf 双向联系: @hebaodanyy_bot 人照一致,嫩妹 ,颜值性价比超级高,性格非常好

❤1

23 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC200 viewsread 26 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-23 【老师】:荷包蛋 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:今天休假,打开电报看见老师吸引了我,本人颜控,照片让我很心动,符合我的审美,出击,到达战场,推门惊艳到了!照片是本人,真人更好看,大长腿,胸手感非常好,皮肤白皙光滑,体验感非常好,各种姿势体验了一篇,对着镜子后入视觉盛宴特别好!情绪价值满分!女友的态度很温柔很丝滑!有空在回!值得推荐 【狼友大队】:点击入群

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gfvjyf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“荷包蛋🍳(课程表” (@gfvjyf), 970 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gfvjyf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.