Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 广州佛山资源修车楼凤约炮

Channel

广州佛山资源修车楼凤约炮

@gfozy1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,084subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001572743548
TypeChannel
Username@gfozy1
Description🇨🇳全国资源点击查看 @xxoo768 👉购买或推广请私信 @xxoo6688bot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gfozy1

Growth

12,07612,09212,0847 August 2026 — 12,076 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,076 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,078 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,086 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,092 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,089 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,086 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,084 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,088 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,091 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,085 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,083 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,082 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,083 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,084 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 18 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,074–12,094 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 02:4212,084+1
22 Aug 2026, 01:1812,083+1
20 Aug 2026, 17:2312,082-1
19 Aug 2026, 20:5212,083-2
18 Aug 2026, 18:3712,085-6
16 Aug 2026, 21:1512,091+3
15 Aug 2026, 15:4712,088+4
14 Aug 2026, 00:3812,084-2
12 Aug 2026, 20:4912,086-3
12 Aug 2026, 00:0412,089-3
11 Aug 2026, 03:0112,092+6
8 Aug 2026, 22:1012,086+8
8 Aug 2026, 00:4512,078+2
7 Aug 2026, 11:3012,076no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:2012,076first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.58%
avg views ÷ 12,084 subscribers
Avg views / post
433
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held16 (6 August 202621 August 2026)
Views total6,931
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,780
Videos
432
Links
1,640

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
37s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC471 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

#佛山 #南海 #百元 #可69 #舌吻 #大波 #FS289 佛山 桂城 小纯 22/170cm/55kg/E #价格 600/1次 1100/2次 老师个子很高 微胖型 皮肤很白 挺热情的 大灯摸着很舒服很大 服务做的挺仔细的 两个大灯在面前晃来晃去实在诱人 口活也很不错 挺不错的一位bbw老师 👉获取联系方式

21 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC447 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

#佛山 #禅城 #百元 #可69 #舌吻 #制服 #FS199 佛山 禅城 石湾 春春 18/163cm/47kg/B #价格 600/1次 1200/2次 人照基本一样 身材挺有肉感 不多也不少刚刚好 冲击起来不像撞骨头那么生硬 各种姿势都很配合 蛇到饱 不催不事 值得推荐 👉获取联系方式

21 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC412 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

#佛山 #南海 #百元 #毒龙 #舌吻 #骚货 #FS121 南海 千灯湖 欧洋 19/165cm/43kg/c #价格 600/1次 1200/2次 人照挺像 皮肤白皙 御姐魅魔 挺魅惑的 是个十足的骚货 大概165左右 腿直细 黄白皮 fw课表都有 非常多的花样 👉获取联系方式

20 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC483 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

#广州 #天河 #千元 #兼职 #舌吻 #可69 #GZ1069 天河 燕塘 小渔 21/160cm/46kg/B #价格 1.3k/1次 2.3k/2次 5k/夜 小萝莉 真人脸有点婴儿肥 挺可爱的 胸b 皮肤白滑无纹身 下面非常紧 超级会夹 do一流 有蛇 说话嗲嗲的会叫哥哥爸爸 住天河 无房只上门 广州佛山都可去 👉获取联系方式

20 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC218 viewsread 21 August 2026
Photo

#广州 #天河 #千元 #兼职 #舌吻 #可69 #GZ1052 天河 珠江新城 小妮 23/165cm/48kg/36B #价格 3000/1次 5200/包夜 刚毕业民航落榜准空姐 真人颜值很可以 身材苗条比例均匀翘臀 吊感十足 非常敏感水多 无房只上门 👉获取联系方式

20 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC218 viewsread 21 August 2026
Photo

#广州 #海珠 #百元 #舌吻 #可69 #制服 #GZ487 海珠 江泰路 安安 22/168cm/48kg/b #价格 800/1次 1600/2次 地方好找 人照七八成 胸是天然熊 没有科技 爱聊天 服务很认真 舌跟69都有 皮肤很白水很多 过程很投入不事不催 值得二刷的老师 👉获取联系方式

12 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC668 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#广州 #天河 #千元 #兼职 #舌吻 #良家 #GZ1025 天河 猎德 美久 28/168cm/52kg/36c #价格 1.5k/1次 2.5k/2次 5k/夜 良家兼职 珠海人懂粤语 定居珠海 从事美甲美睫护肤行业 珠海广州业务往返 御姐气质很不错 大长腿气质佳 偶尔约约炮 无风尘味良家素人 非常biu的fo 👉获取联系方式

12 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC633 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#广州 #天河 #千元 #兼职 #舌吻 #可69 #GZ488 天河 珠江新城 luan 25/172cm/50kg/34c #价格 5k/1次 8k/2次 1w/夜 网红御姐 颜值跟图片基本一致 长腿网红款 高挑小蛮腰 172大长腿 胸c 比例很好 九头身 逼紧水多 艹起来很润 皮肤很滑 性格很健谈开朗 不错的大圈五 颜值态度都OK 👉获取联系方式

12 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC606 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#广州 #海珠 #百元 #舌吻 #可69 #制服 #GZ436 海珠 江泰路 圆圆 18/158cm/38kg/B #价格 900/1次 1700/2次 妹子18岁 高158 不到80斤 胸b 乖乖女类型幼态脸 可蛇可69 口技嫩妹初学水平 略有齿感 下路紧度正常 包裹感不错 姿势配合 态度全程在线 👉获取联系方式

12 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC57 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#广州 #海珠 #百元 #口爆 #舌吻 #可69 #GZ485 海珠 石溪 汐宝 27/167cm/46kg/c #价格 500/1次 800/2次 性感骚气的女人 服务全自动 聊天很会引导 完全自来熟 会主动找话题 身材也很棒腿蛮长蛮好看的 态度很好 性价比高 👉获取联系方式

12 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC63 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#佛山 #禅城 #百元 #制服 #可69 #舌吻 #FS174 佛山 禅城 盈盈 18/168cm/46kg/c #价格 800/1次 1500/2次 18岁 身高168 重90左右 胸b-c 很乖很温柔的一个嫩妹 身材方面没得挑剔 颜值的话各花入各眼吧 总的来说不错的 👉获取联系方式

12 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC68 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#佛山 #禅城 #百元 #嫩妹 #可69 #舌吻 #FS208 佛山 禅城 妍妍 18/165cm/42kg/c #价格 800/1次 1500/2次 清纯脸 御姐身材 细枝硕果 性格比较腼腆和害羞 真人比照片更好看 颗兔牙笑起来非常可爱 货真价实的D奶 嫩妹的D奶就是不一样又软又紧实 👉获取联系方式

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gfozy1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,331,219 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“广州佛山资源修车楼凤约炮” (@gfozy1), 12,084 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gfozy1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.