Channel
@gewen152
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,020subscribers
-1,989 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001641126376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gewen152 |
| Description | 人物包装 精品套图 人设素材 生活素材 人物套图客服格温 @gewen688 （24小时在线） 双向机器人 @gewen111_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gewen152 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 21,020 | -363 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 21,383 | -256 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 21,639 | -174 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 21,813 | -190 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 22,003 | -553 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 22,556 | -336 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 22,892 | -117 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 23,009 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (28 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,985 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😮💨😵😵💫🤐🥴🤢 本频道开放🤭🥱智能AI搜索话术开单秘籍群 本频道开放🤭🥱聊天寻找资源 三方套图专区 🫣专注收录曝光量低的三方，懂您所需 🫥套图 【欧美女】 😐套图 【亚洲男】 🫨套图 【亚洲女】 😬套图 【欧美男】 🙄套图 【女私密】 格纹精聊业务 🫣做业务必备各种资源专区，谢谢关注 😴精品 【话术区】 😴生活区 【素材区】 😴美工 【证件ps】 😴id节点 【小火箭】 😴代写 【人设定】 😴绘画区 【专定制】 😴人脸 【ps人脸】 😴送快递 【全球寄】 格纹娱乐专区 🫣聊天娱乐交友放松的专区，开展活动 🤔鉴黄总部 🤔 东南亚新闻曝光 😲签到奖励群 🤔 无名供需发布群 🤤人工客服格温 @gewen688…
#回国退休 #FIRE生活 #奥巴马健保 #edison新泽西 #brunch #coffee贝果 #Roth转换
美国大农村生活，晚上8点饭后散步偶遇了野生火鸡群#美国生活 #美国住宅 #美国大农村 #移民生活
美国大农村生活，晚上8点饭后散步偶遇了野生火鸡群#美国生活 #美国住宅 #美国大农村 #移民生活
#美国 #美国生活 #美国移民 #浪漫生活的记录者
金主广告🤗 😴包装绘画 🤭单人素描画价格低40u 😴自营能量 🤭trx兑换能量租赁 😴ai建模 🤭ai建模变声 😴自营社工库 🤭 查档 😴盘口招租 🤭 外汇盘 秒合约 等招租 🤔🤔需要哪方面素材 评论到下面🤔🤔
❤1
😮💨😵😵💫🤐🥴🤢 本频道开放🤭🥱智能AI搜索话术开单秘籍群 本频道开放🤭🥱聊天寻找资源 三方套图专区 🫣专注收录曝光量低的三方，懂您所需 🫥套图 【欧美女】 😐套图 【亚洲男】 🫨套图 【亚洲女】 😬套图 【欧美男】 🙄套图 【女私密】 格纹精聊业务 🫣做业务必备各种资源专区，谢谢关注 😴精品 【话术区】 😴生活区 【素材区】 😴美工 【证件ps】 😴id节点 【小火箭】 😴代写 【人设定】 😴绘画区 【专定制】 😴人脸 【ps人脸】 😴送快递 【全球寄】 格纹娱乐专区 🫣聊天娱乐交友放松的专区，开展活动 🤔鉴黄总部 🤔 东南亚新闻曝光 😲签到奖励群 🤔 无名供需发布群 🤤人工客服格温 @gewen688…
埃及的夏天藏在尼罗河里 带队泛舟尼罗河，撞见当地人的消暑时光。远山、椰枣林、戏水的大人小孩与河边骏马，古老河流孕育的鲜活生活，远比古迹更动人。 #埃及旅行 #卢克索 #尼罗河
美西自驾｜Page佩吉小镇 美西🇺🇸自驾路过亚利桑那Page佩吉小镇 别只知道马蹄湾、羚羊谷！荒漠之中藏着蓝宝石一般的鲍威尔湖Lake Powell💙还有一个网红隐藏机位——Shell加油站后的沙洞（Shell Cave）📍Shell加油站沙洞 地址：1501 AZ‑98, Page, AZ 86040 加油之后，从加油站后方小路步行5分钟即达，🆓无门票 波浪状橘红色砂岩，迷你平替羚羊谷，不用预约不用向导，随手拍氛围感大片，下午4点左右光线最佳，拍剪影绝了～ ✅page必打卡清单 ▪️Shell加油站后网红沙洞｜免费小众，必拍人像 ▪️鲍威尔湖Wahweap观景台｜俯瞰绿松石色湖水，看红岩与碧水撞色 ▪️格伦峡谷大桥｜大坝全景机位 ▪️顺路打卡马蹄湾、羚羊谷，一站式刷完美西王牌景点 一半荒芜红岩戈壁，一半澄澈蓝色湖水 佩吉，美西路上不能错过的惊喜小城🌵 💡小Tips 沙洞地面是沙土碎石，穿防滑鞋子；没有遮阳，注意防晒补水。 …
夕阳下的纽约 在summit观景台看到了很美的晚霞✌🏻 #美国旅行
美国圣塔克鲁滋美食 1号公路自驾沿途，午餐，海鲜～ #美国 #美食
🥪史詩美味開心果醬｜洛杉矶最瘋狂的一口！！！ #美国 #加州 #洛杉矶 #洛杉矶美食 #加州美食
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @gewen152. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 118,062 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gewen152 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“格温素材 人物包装 人设套图” (@gewen152), 21,020 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gewen152.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.