Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Living Naturally

@gettinghealthy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,549subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001605658420
TypeChannel
Username@gettinghealthy
Created6 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gettinghealthy

Growth

3,5493,5573,5537 August 2026 — 3,557 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,557 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,549 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,548–3,558 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:253,549-8
7 Aug 2026, 04:453,557no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:343,557first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 3,549 subscribers
Avg views / post
604
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held19 (14 January 202621 July 2026)
Views total1,207
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 10s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 06:52 UTC485 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ThePatriotAUVideo

🚨BREAKING: The FBI interfered with an investigation by Customs and Border Protection that would have delved into the Wuhan lab-leak theory. ~ Just the News

16 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC722 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GeneralMCNews

BREAKING: The FDA has announced the recall of more than 735,000 packages of Pillsbury bread rolls over concerns that they may contain glass. @GeneralMCNews

30 Jun 2026, 19:28 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @eyecatchers2021

🚨 A recall of baby wipes sold by Target has been upgraded to the FDA's highest risk level, indicating a risk of serious health effects or death. Target voluntarily recalled its Up & Up Fragrance Free Baby Wipes and Up & Up Fresh Cucumber Scented Baby Wipes earlier this month after customers complained of product discoloration and reported potential infections associated with use of the baby wipes. Subsequent testi

3 May 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Tironianae

Wood chips being found in Dave's Killer Bread Not small wood shavings, not little pieces. These are pretty large wood chips (shown) and they are throughout the entire loaf This has already been reported to the FDA Dave's Killer Bread is the top-selling organic sliced bread brand in the US (Video in Link) https://i.fixupx.com/i/status/2050918294702710870

19 Mar 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TironianaePhoto

Shocking ingredients inside American mayonnaise “You think you're eating a traditional egg condiment, but factories are actually pumping Hellman's full of cheap, highly inflammatory soybean oil Worse, to stop this unnatural mixture from separating on the shelf, they inject it with calcium disodium EDTA. This is a synthetic laboratory chemical used in medicine to trap heavy metals yet food corporations are legally

26 Feb 2026, 07:06 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Tironianae

This is INSANE “This is how many pieces of your child's favorite candy they can consume per year before they surpass their safe level of arsenic intake:” Black Forest Gummy Bears - 16 pieces per year Laffy Taffys - 4 pieces per year Trolli Sour Gummy Worms - 12 pieces per year Hershey’s Cookies and Cream bars - 1.5 bars per year Jolly Ranchers -6 per year Kit Kats -4 per year Twizzlers Strawberry - 4 per year Twizz

24 Feb 2026, 23:36 UTC853 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @candlesinthenightVideo

Casey DeSantis: We have found a number of Popular Breads contain Dangerous Levels of Glysophate Highest levels of Glyphosate: - Sara Lee Honey Wheat - Nature’s Own Butter Bread - Wonder Bread Classic White - Nature’s Own Perfectly Crafted White Low or no detectable glyphosate: - Dave’s Killer Bread White Done Right - Dave’s Killer Bread 21 Whole Grains - Sara Lee Artesano White - Pepperidge Farm Farmhouse Hearty

24 Feb 2026, 21:29 UTC760 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

DO NOT EAT WHEAT THINS Wheat Thins are now banned in Japan, the UK, and several parts of Europe due to their content of BHT, a synthetic preservative linked to endocrine disruptions, organ-system toxicity, and an increased risk of certain cancers. Regulators in these regions cited potential long-term health risks as the reason for the ban, prioritising consumer safety. BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) is commonly use

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @gettinghealthy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,027,753 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Living Naturally” (@gettinghealthy), 3,549 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gettinghealthy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.