Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 67 days, net -147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,545–3,736 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 21:31
3,567
-12
6 Oct 2026, 20:18
3,579
-13
29 Sept 2026, 12:56
3,592
-22
19 Sept 2026, 03:00
3,614
-4
14 Sept 2026, 10:16
3,618
-3
11 Sept 2026, 01:17
3,621
-10
6 Sept 2026, 04:37
3,631
-18
1 Sept 2026, 17:26
3,649
-12
29 Aug 2026, 22:53
3,661
-5
26 Aug 2026, 18:38
3,666
-5
24 Aug 2026, 02:44
3,671
-9
20 Aug 2026, 12:56
3,680
-9
17 Aug 2026, 12:05
3,689
-9
13 Aug 2026, 17:54
3,698
-8
10 Aug 2026, 09:37
3,706
-8
7 Aug 2026, 00:30
3,714
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:21
3,714
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
360 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
99
27.5%
👍
95
26.4%
🥰
73
20.3%
🔥
55
15.3%
👏
22
6.11%
😁
7
1.94%
🎉
5
1.39%
🤣
4
1.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2023 to 26 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Quack, quack—big news!
We’re teaming up with BAD to hatch Quantum Quack, an AI KOL agent packed with on-chain insights, breaking crypto updates, and unstoppable memetic vibes.
Better yet, $QUACK holders can earn rewards for using the agent. Stay tuned for more details!
✨ Trade QUACK/USDT and Win Up to 2,200,000,000,000 $QUACK! ✨ ( ⏳1 Day / 24 H)
RichQUACK is thrilled to announce an exciting trading event in partnership with Vanilla Finance on the BNBChain! 🚀 Here’s your chance to claim massive rewards while trading $QUACK!
💸 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Guaranteed Rewards
Trade 10+ USDT on QUACK/USDT during the event, and you’ll automatically be eligible to win guaranteed rewards in …
URGENT: #Hotbit exchange will be discontinuing its services. Ensure you withdraw all your$QUACK to your wallet or transfer to another exchange. Take action now to secure your funds.
A big thanks to Hotbit for being the 1st exchange to list #RichQUACK! We appreciate you!
Attention all members! We're excited to announce that we're moving our announcement channel to a sub-group on our main group, t.me/richquack. Join us there to stay up-to-date with the latest updates about RichQUACK! We've also created new sub-groups to make it easier for people to discuss and engage with the community. We hope to see you there!
📢 In the interest of fairness, we've updated our twitter giveaway winners list. The following users have been removed:
@fanatic_quack
@bazarganiamir40
@quackfella
@All_QUACK01
@quacksaly
@kudzome
Reason: Irrelevant responses and higher engagement than the author's tweet.
❗️Note: Using promoters is not allowed for future giveaways.
New rules for next week:
1. You must be subscribed to Twitter Blue to participat…
Unyielding Spirit: RichQUACK's Rise Beyond Defeat
A Rap for Huobi Primevote! Turn on your Volume!
https://twitter.com/RichQuack/status/1649776326667288587
New Tweets:
1. https://twitter.com/RichQuack/status/1648943622505771008
2. https://twitter.com/RichQuack/status/1649033486559502338
3. https://twitter.com/RichQuack/status/1649036374799192065
Active Giveaways:
1. Telegram Daily Giveaway 2B x 10 Winners
2. Discord Daily Giveaway 2B x 10 Winners
3. Twitter Weekly Most Posts 35B x 10 Winners (TOP10), 15B x 10 Winners (11-20) https://t.me/getrichquack/964
4. $25 https:/…
👍17❤2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @getrichquack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
11
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
11
vacant every time we have ever looked
@getrichquack named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@all_quack01 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@bazarganiamir40 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@fanatic_quack named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@kudzome named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@paksskiller named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@quackchef20 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@quackfella named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@quackgem named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@quacklandqueen named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@quacksaly named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@shishi_quack named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RichQuack Token Announcement” (@getrichquack), 3,567 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/getrichquack.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.