Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Get Free Bitcoin !!! - Payments

Channel

Get Free Bitcoin !!! - Payments

@get_btc_payments

Not marked by Telegram, checked 18 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,693subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002242037473
TypeChannel
Username@get_btc_payments
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/get_btc_payments

Growth

6,6516,6936,6727 August 2026 — 6,684 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,676 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,656 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,651 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,693 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,645–6,699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 02:526,693+42
15 Aug 2026, 12:256,651-5
11 Aug 2026, 23:346,656-20
8 Aug 2026, 13:576,676-8
7 Aug 2026, 18:036,684first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.564%
avg views ÷ 6,693 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.8
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
62
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held62 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total2,341
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC3 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1qqt9zj428nsfcw0hdv4tg72ydjuq2x80jekyj83pp2fmsdlaeshqsezs05x Amount: 0.0025 BTC ~ 250000 Satoshi f46d9628a769ca1985f0881bcfb490764495a2e7871981ce80a265235017e505

11 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1q6kmgj29he4e59ztudhdd504rn3xc4fx52uh4rd Amount: 0.0012 BTC ~ 120000 Satoshi b02df0ca310732b0d54ed842d14db572b7e36876ec253c11317356a7bbd328a2

11 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1qk2uux8mng3qre65xhdr0zuyv8fymuw4pz4z40e Amount: 0.0021 BTC ~ 210000 Satoshi 92451bab09e1480fb8d95d1e597de4f02e50563b4e873544a2f489d1fcf11669

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC23 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: 17dzrDBuC6BSm2CLnFEH6Bws1h5qzfF49B Amount: 0.001559 BTC ~ 155900 Satoshi 89bcd59f2a08d878cac94b32569c17c26eef7c3938557580e11f3da386a8bb84

11 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC24 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1q4j35a7vxjggh6znupa750rzuap0xuc9zq0yksk Amount: 0.001678 BTC ~ 167800 Satoshi 9b934760d415cf2dd9d22358cf9ced6fd0c53658812764b2303107c378cf7ea8

11 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC25 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1qyzp9hehmytqj0j58drpzagdechpaaau8d3ukyg Amount: 0.001281 BTC ~ 128100 Satoshi 4da35de8c25584692a7c22e80434da6b737f634182db0a41fdee3889f9faf2de

11 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC30 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1qa2x6gc5yutnpsk49h7uh23kpy5e2995th0xqfq Amount: 0.001651 BTC ~ 165100 Satoshi 42ae35321e69d54c9d4bad7191b970d34dae009ea3a215de82a992a1a7d3c85c

11 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1qdypxjw0suxxvsmtwy3ulewtcn4fdjwf2tz9aux Amount: 0.00121 BTC ~ 121000 Satoshi 1e19077a0d63bea23dac2ea181f8df2a4fbcdf864069557acebcd3bd1dbef3d3

11 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC30 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: 3NqhnpHQLxkVu7AeufejLkmLxCsEaWJqXk Amount: 0.001617 BTC ~ 161700 Satoshi e7f565fc8745dff496f3a7641411fbf789deac7cae6863e02f94d0f4d56687e4

11 Aug 2026, 01:24 UTC33 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1qw9q2snsjjvqh9mzm547ah3aayfgk2tpnw7wx449t4wuuy6l4jxtsumaz73 Amount: 0.0015 BTC ~ 150000 Satoshi 8322fd4dc65be14565a316a44d99e409d389078674273e8f1259fc6ab55cc9ea

11 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC33 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1qdwsfv64m7vmq5my65gtkdmvrnnluswaaq6we05 Amount: 0.00277 BTC ~ 277000 Satoshi da2beaeac453b94415c2118d1620c511f04d4a731e8521b48b261a285ec4928d

10 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026

📤 Withdrawal Sent To: bc1qzhewv4wda7apzrjlefk4l49ujlxjfypvnj8arz Amount: 0.001099 BTC ~ 109900 Satoshi ad1938b69ce5bd54c4ff388e8da1b485f2f4cde54bfa8f345bfa9f5e3c8d3339

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @get_btc_payments. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fun Game 👾
@Sfungame · 106,808
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Get Free Bitcoin !!! - Payments” (@get_btc_payments), 6,693 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/get_btc_payments.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.