Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Germanlearn_Jalali

Channel

Germanlearn_Jalali

@germanlearn_Jalali

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,760subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001159192983
TypeChannel
Username@germanlearn_Jalali
Descriptionمدرس: استاد نوبخت 👩🏻‍🏫 👩🏻‍💻 ادمین ثبت نام : 🆔 @admiin_german 📝 💎 جهت تهیه پکیج : 🆔 @Admiiin_package 💿 🦋 اینستاگرام : https://instagram.com/germanlearn_Jalal 🥰کانال رضایت زبان آموزان: https://t.me/Rezayatalmani
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/germanlearn_Jalali

Growth

15,72515,76015,742.56 August 2026 — 15,725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,735 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,730 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,727 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,733 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,734 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,732 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,734 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,739 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,750 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,760 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,720–15,765 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:2715,760+10
16 Aug 2026, 05:1215,750+11
14 Aug 2026, 17:3415,739+5
13 Aug 2026, 10:0515,734+2
11 Aug 2026, 11:1315,732-2
10 Aug 2026, 13:5815,734+1
9 Aug 2026, 14:1315,733+6
8 Aug 2026, 13:3415,727-3
7 Aug 2026, 13:4015,730-5
6 Aug 2026, 17:1015,735+10
6 Aug 2026, 04:3015,725first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 15,760 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held42 (27 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total68,609
Reactions total880
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,080
Videos
1,180
Links
205

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 22s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

738 reactions across 34 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
58579.3%
👏314.20%
👍263.52%
❤‍🔥141.90%
👌141.90%
🔥141.90%
🙏141.90%
🥰91.22%
😁81.08%
🤩70.949%
💯50.678%
😍30.407%
🍓20.271%
😐20.271%
🥱20.271%
🥴20.271%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 880reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC477 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

کدام جمله از نظر گرامری درست است؟

  1. A) Du brauchst heute nicht kommen.12%
  2. B) Du musst heute nicht zu kommen.12%
  3. C) Du brauchst heute nicht zu kommen.72%
  4. D) Du brauchst heute nicht zu musst kommen.4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8👍2🙏2

17 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC514 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🇩🇪 گرامر هفته | brauchen + zu + Infinitiv یک ساختار کاربردی که خیلی وقت‌ها با müssen اشتباه گرفته می‌شود! 👀 ✨ brauchen + nicht + zu + Infinitiv یعنی: لازم نیست که… ✅ Du brauchst heute nicht zu arbeiten. امروز لازم نیست کار کنی. ✅ Du brauchst keine Angst zu haben. لازم نیست بترسی. 📌 نکته مهم: brauchen معمولاً در این کاربرد همراه با nicht / kein می‌آید و بعد از آن zu + مصدر قرار می‌گیرد. 🔹 Du musst nicht kommen. لاز

7🔥5🙏2👏1

16 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC858 views30 reactionsread 17 August 2026

✅آموزش اصطلاح امروز: Wie du mir, so ich dir. این به اون در😌 #اصطلاح ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ 『𝓒𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓷𝓮𝓵 』@Germanlearn_Jalali

21👌6🔥3

16 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC831 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

12🙏3

16 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC999 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026

فقط با ۴۹۰ هزار تومان پول دو تا اسکوپ بستنی 🍧آلمانی رو شروع کن🥳

2🤩1

15 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,280 views32 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

یک ویدیو آلمانی دوست داشتنی از تفاوت دنیای نوه و مادربزرگ🫶🏻 #مکالمه ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ 『𝓒𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓷𝓮𝓵 』@Germanlearn_Jalali

26❤‍🔥3🥰3

14 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈1,460 views10 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5❤‍🔥5

14 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,430 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

ماه آخر تابستون رو به هیچ وجه از دستش نده 😍 🩷از ۲۵ مرداد تا ۵ شهریور بهترین فرصت برای شروع تو با ما🥳 https://t.me/+xrsMadlxjRFlN2I0 https://t.me/+xrsMadlxjRFlN2I0

2👏1

13 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,560 views13 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🎧🇩🇪 پادکست امروز | Slow German ✨ تعطیلات آخر هفته، بهترین فرصت برای تقویت شنیدار آلمانیه! 🎙 Slow German یک پادکست جذاب با گفتار آهسته و واضح درباره موضوعات روزمره، فرهنگ و زندگی در آلمان. ✅ مناسب B1 به بالا ⏱ قسمت‌های کوتاه و کاربردی 📄 همراه با متن 🎵 دانلود رایگان MP3 🎯 این آخر هفته فقط روزی ۱۰ دقیقه گوش بده؛شنیدارت رو به چالش بکش! 🇩🇪 🔗 دانلود و گوش دادن: https://slowgerman.com/start-3/ #پادکست ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ 『𝓒𝓱

8👏2💯2👌1

12 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,410 views31 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🇩🇪 Deutsch in der Küche 🍳 | آلمانی در آشپزخانه آشپزی فقط برای درست کردن غذای خوشمزه نیست؛ می‌تونه یک فرصت عالی برای یادگیری لغات آلمانی هم باشه! 👩‍🍳✨ 🔹 waschen – شستن 🧼 🔹 schälen – پوست کندن 🥔 🔹 schneiden – بریدن 🔪 🔹 aufschlagen – شکستن (تخم‌مرغ) 🥚 🔹 reiben – رنده کردن 🧀 🔹 auspressen – آب گرفتن 🍋 🔹 verquirlen – هم زدن با همزن 🥣 🔹 kneten – ورز دادن 🍞 🔹 rühren – هم زدن 🥄 #لغت این ها رو خوب مرور کنید از این به بعد میخ

20👏4🤩3👌2🥰1🥱1

11 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC≈1,510 views29 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

آموزش اصطلاح امروز: 📚 🇩🇪 Da liegt der Hase im Pfeffer! 🐰🌶️ معنی تحت‌اللفظی: «خرگوش آنجاست که فلفل است!» 😂 معنی واقعی: «مشکل دقیقاً همین‌جاست!» / «نکته‌ی اصلی همین‌جاست!» 💡 مثال: Ich weiß, dass du viel arbeitest, aber da liegt der Hase im Pfeffer! من می‌دونم که خیلی کار می‌کنی، اما مشکل دقیقاً همین‌جاست! 🤔 #اصطلاح ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ𓂃ꕤ 『𝓒𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓷𝓮𝓵 』@Germanlearn_Jalali

26👏2😁1

10 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC≈1,520 views37 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

گاهی رفتن شکست نیست؛ لحظه‌ای است که بالاخره می‌فهمی لایق چه چیزی هستی.» ❤ #پست_شبانه

31❤‍🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @germanlearn_Jalali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz207 voters

کدام جمله از نظر گرامری درست است؟

  1. A) Du brauchst heute nicht kommen.12%
  2. B) Du musst heute nicht zu kommen.12%
  3. C) Du brauchst heute nicht zu kommen.72%
  4. D) Du brauchst heute nicht zu musst kommen.4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTCAnonymous Quiz364 voters

کدام جمله درست است؟

  1. A) Wenn ich klein war, spielte ich jeden Tag Fußball.22%
  2. B) Als es morgen regnet, bleibe ich zu Hause.8%
  3. C) Als ich klein war, spielte ich jeden Tag Fußball.63%
  4. D) Wenn ich 10 Jahre alt war, bekam ich ein Fahrrad.7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 97,981 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Germanlearn_Jalali” (@germanlearn_Jalali), 15,760 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/germanlearn_Jalali.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.