Channel
@geoengineering11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
820subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001502210656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geoengineering11 |
| Created | Between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geoengineering11 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 820 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 819 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,055 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What we are experiencing is 6th Generation Warfare https://open.substack.com/pub/thewinepress/p/mockingbird-20-cia-compromised-podcasts 🚨This is also relevant to chemtrails! We all here know that it is the fuel of all planes that is dirty (see why here: https://t.me/geoengineering11/1110 & https://t.me/geoengineering11/1700 ) and that the engine modifications have the effect that the fuel particles, heavy metal…
Video, posted without a caption
Geoengineering Research™️ pinned an audio file
Geoengineering Research™️ pinned a video
1. THE 'REAL' DISCLOSURE IS HAPPENING - It's real this time and EVERYBODY is talking about, and no it is not UFO's. 2. MSAART PLASMOID ENGINE Kerosene Jet Engine Retrofits Full Presentation And here the live test results with professional equipment @ Cosmic Summet 2024 link This is 💯 real, and if someone wants real solutions for our pollution from all engines, this is surely one of them 👍👌🥂
Geoengineering Research™️ pinned a video
Geoengineering Research™️ pinned «Fascinating reading... This ether technology can be used to make rain AND clean up smog pollution! If only there is someone who can make these things...»
@Jim Lee @ClimateViewer does it again, just listen to the intro video <2 mins and see if it doesn’t spark your interest! Jim Lee on Toxic Jet Fuel, Sulfur Pollution and Geoengineering https://decentralize.tv/Posts/2026-07-10-jim-lee-on-toxic-jet-fuel-sulfur-pollution-geoengineering.html
The Fight Against Geoengineering Has Missed the Target — So We Took It to the EPA A landmark Petition for Rulemaking is now on the federal record. Here’s what it says, why it matters, and what you can do in the next five minutes. https://www.climateviewer.news/p/the-fight-against-geoengineering
5 Earthquakes in One Day… Is the Next BIG One Coming? Geophysicist Stefan Burns Explains In a single day, the ground ruptured across California, Japan, and Venezuela — including a rare and devastating "doublet" in Venezuela, where two major quakes struck just 39 seconds apart and the second was bigger than the first. Why is this happening? And what if some of it isn't entirely natural? To make sense of it all, Neal…
Technology is on the cusp of allowing humans to disrupt or steer natural disasters, like hurricanes, according to a new study, which appeared in the journal PLOS Water on June 24. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/weather/2026/06/27/study-cloud-seeding-disrupt-hurricanes/90655884007/
For nearly twenty years, I believed what many of you believed: that the streaks I was seeing in the sky were intentional. Purposeful. A secret spray program designed to sicken, manipulate, or worse. I was in the anti-geoengineering movement before most people had even heard the term. I spoke about it. I spread it. I believed it. Then I decided to take it to court three years ago. That’s when the whole narrative sta…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @geoengineering11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 594,737 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Geoengineering Research™️” (@geoengineering11), 820 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geoengineering11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.