Is the bear market over???
- NOT YET51%
- Most definitely over, bull market coming.50%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Tiger6z

Channel
@gentlecapital
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
16,038subscribers
-482 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002348869447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gentlecapital |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gentlecapital |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 16,038 | -58 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 16,096 | -25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 16,121 | -23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:32 | 16,144 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:06 | 16,160 | -21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 16,181 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 16,197 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 16,215 | -19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 16,234 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 16,252 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 16,262 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 16,271 | -23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 16,294 | -19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 16,313 | -24 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 16,337 | -25 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 16,362 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 16,375 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 16,385 | -19 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 16,404 | -17 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 16,421 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (1 June 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,550 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
315 reactions across 26 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 161 | 51.1% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 21.9% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 5.71% | |
| 👀 | 16 | 5.08% | |
| 😈 | 11 | 3.49% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 2.54% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 1.59% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 1.59% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.27% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.27% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.27% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.635% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.635% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.635% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.317% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.317% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.317% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.317% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Is the bear market over???
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Tiger6z
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Tiger6z
What a cook
❤2
Signed Tiger6z
Holy shit somebody just hit a 168,891x on MetaWin If you gamble make sure you’re not getting ripped off doing it anywhere else MetaWin is one of very few casinos who actually let you withdraw your full winnings immediately And they have the best rewards of any casino on CT by far They’re giving away $400k to their players this week alone If you deposit on metawin.com, you qualify for part of it
❤2🫡2
Signed Tiger6z
Bitcoin is just not stopping. This is the most INSANE pump I’ve seen on Bitcoin in a long fucking time. In life you only get a couple of generational events in your life and this incoming bull market is one of them. So lock the fuck in.
🔥7❤4😈3
Signed Tiger6z
Holy shit one of you just hit 16,875x?? I just watched someone turn $7.50 into over $126,000 on MetaWin They just committed to giving away $500,000 to their players over the next 2 weeks If you deposit on metawin.com you qualify for the rewards I would go get your share of these giveaways while they last
❤3
Signed Tiger6z
The breakout is beautiful. Looks like 57k bitcoin was the bottom for the bear market.
🔥4❤2👻2😍1
Signed Tiger6z
People are literally up hundreds of thousands of dollars off a Chinese memecoin. Who said the trenches were dead??
❤7🔥4😈2
Signed Tiger6z
use code ‘X100’ when you deposit to claim
🔥1
Signed Tiger6z
Be sure to claim your free $1,000 today while this offer lasts Everyone who deposits on metawin.com gets their deposit doubled up to $1k So it’s literally a free thousand dollars On top of that, they’re giving away another $1M to players this month So if you deposit, you qualify for both offers And if you get lucky you might turn your deposit into $243k like this while you’re at it…
❤3
Signed Tiger6z
Holy shit one of you turned $3 into $20k today on MetaWin They just airdropped us $4M last month And today they announced they have ANOTHER $1M going out to their players Everyone who deposits on metawin.com qualifies If you gamble, make sure you’re doing it there so you get your free $$
❤6👍3🔥2👨💻1
Signed Tiger6z
The official solana gaming twitter account just follow the $BRICK twitter page shooting us up giving us a 3x overnight.. $BRICK really cooking here. 8Byg9wi43TNzgJpYta6UXxPz3LPe8v6ZwvmWWoWQpump
❤2❤🔥1🔥1😈1
Signed Tiger6z
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @gentlecapital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Is the bear market over???
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
When do you guys think the bottom is for Bitcoin?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gentle Capital” (@gentlecapital), 16,038 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gentlecapital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.