Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
GENSHINFESS.
@genshinfess
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,177subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001128854518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @genshinfess |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/genshinfess |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 8,177 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 8,176 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 8,177 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 8,179 | first reading |
Engagement
152 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.24%
- avg views ÷ 8,177 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 101
- 143 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.96%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 152
- of 152 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 143 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 152 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,459 |
| Reactions total | 240 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
240 reactions across 32 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 130 | 54.2% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 11.3% | |
| 😭 | 19 | 7.92% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 6.25% | |
| 💘 | 14 | 5.83% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 5.83% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.417% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 152 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 152 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 143 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @genshinfess. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 152 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Time's up! Spare a moment to take a peek at @TheBeautyBase and @CoserZone. And another quick reminder to boycott these products affiliated by Zionist, a little action from you means a lot to support humanity. Thank you for obeying the rules and live up my shift. ^____^ I'll see you in the next shift. Nighty-night, Tabibito! 🩷
Channel name was changed to «GENSHINFESS.»
#Mondstadt. Tabii, tadi sender enggak sengaja langsung claim reward daicom di kateryne tanpa perhatiin ini. Kalau udah begini berarti udah ga bisa claim 10 primonya ya?
#liyue join circle coop ku di wa yuk? all gender allowed yaa gaada minimal ar jugaa. nanti kita seru seruan bisa dc jugaa atau bikin konten! leave your best trace yaa.
#liyue adakah yang map fontaine udh unlock semua??? aku mau minta material arle disana hehe, nanti aku bantuin apa aja deh sebagai gantinya...
#Inazuma https://t.me/genshinfess/174730 baru sekarang nyeselnya, haduh harusnya ku nikmatin dulu snezhnaya baru jual😭😭
#mondstadt https://t.me/genshinfess/174792 aku udah restart juga t___t apa karena device, ya? padahal device aku masih capable
Bot Aether tutup ya, @LumineRobot masih open, jangan sampe nyasar
#Inazuma gini ya rasanya kalo ga prefarm.... mana sender orgnya ga sabaran lagi 😔😔 mau cepet cepet stat chara bagus
#mondstadt guys ini tuh kenapa sih, aku udah repair turunin fps, sampai enable compatibility mode tapi tetap gini. tapi kalau di map lain engga gini :/
#Mondstadt tabi, kompas snezhnaya kayak NK gak?
Showing the 12 most recent of 152 posts we hold for @genshinfess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 138,374 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CoserZone · 3,7252 postsCoser Zone Archive
@CosuArchive · 731 postDufan Fess Partnership
@DufessPs · 21 postGenshinFess PP Info.
@GenshinFessPP · 501 postMeowchine is OPEN!
@meowchine · 2491 postMUNtual!
@MUNtual · 91,4891 postPARTNERSHIP PF
@PartnershipPF · 81 postRentalgram’s Mutual
@RGMutual · 231 postPartnerShip
@ShipKfess · 141 postBasreng Partnership
@temanbasreng · 151 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Noctelisee · 2583 postsBahasa.
@BahasaFess · 4,6352 postsKLOSED — KinciiFess
@KinciiFess · 49,0292 postsPaletteFess (OPEN)
@PaletteFess · 10,2192 postsRaceFess #RoadToGlory 🇲🇨
@RaceFess · 18,7852 postsOPEN: BASE RENTAL GEPENG.
@BaseRent2D · 4,6941 postCosplayer Zone.
@CoserZone · 3,7251 postArt Fess!
@lacifess · 8,8031 postRENTALGRAM 🇮🇩
@Rentalgram · 26,2381 postSTAR RAIL BASE: OPEN, NO LEAKS!
@StarRailBase · 1,8871 postBEAUTY AND THE BASE
@TheBeautyBase · 42,9311 postWORKFESS: BUY & TRADE 2D
@WorkFess · 11,0821 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GENSHINFESS.” (@genshinfess), 8,177 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/genshinfess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.