Video, posted without a caption
🤩50🐳6😭4❤1
Signed Nightmare

Channel
@genshin_impact_irani
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,217subscribers
+388 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001480855349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @genshin_impact_irani |
| Created | 7 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/genshin_impact_irani |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 20,217 | +31 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 20,186 | +20 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:54 | 20,166 | +23 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 20,143 | +55 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 20,088 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 20,092 | -23 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 20,115 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 20,107 | +45 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 20,062 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:13 | 20,055 | +10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 20,045 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 20,042 | +7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 20,035 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 20,028 | +17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 20,011 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 20,022 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 20,025 | +19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 20,006 | +49 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 19,957 | +23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 19,934 | first reading |
412 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 412 (7 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 529,860 |
| Reactions total | 19,076 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 83 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55,961 reactions across 409 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11,857 | 21.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8,851 | 15.8% | |
| 😭 | 5,947 | 10.6% | |
| 👍 | 5,800 | 10.4% | |
| 💔 | 4,909 | 8.77% | |
| 🤣 | 3,824 | 6.83% | |
| 🤯 | 2,053 | 3.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,999 | 3.57% | |
| 👌 | 1,602 | 2.86% | |
| 🌚 | 1,516 | 2.71% | |
| 👏 | 842 | 1.50% | |
| 💘 | 673 | 1.20% | |
| 🤔 | 610 | 1.09% | |
| 🍓 | 548 | 0.979% | |
| 🥰 | 519 | 0.927% | |
| 🤡 | 455 | 0.813% | |
| 🦄 | 448 | 0.801% | |
| 🐳 | 408 | 0.729% | |
| 👀 | 390 | 0.697% | |
| ⚡ | 385 | 0.688% | |
| 35 further kinds | 2,325 | 4.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 410 of the 412 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55,961 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 412 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @genshin_impact_irani. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 412 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video, posted without a caption
🤩50🐳6😭4❤1
Signed Nightmare
پدر ۱ ایران🔥
❤77🔥13👍2🤯1
Signed کرفولعلی
ردیم کد بزنید 😭🤣 ( کوبیده پریمو نیست) YOAL3V36XHS7 سایت برای وارد کردن ردیم کد : https://genshin.hoyoverse.com/m/en/gift ❤️ Channel: @Genshin_Impact_Irani 😊 Our Team: @GameVidiaIR
💔96❤17🍓4👍1
Signed 𝑺𝒆𝒑𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒉
#Fun ‼️حالا جزئیاتش هرچی باشه کلیتش همینه که کپچرینگ رادیانس نمیزاره بیشتر از سه بار پشت سر هم لوز بدید و یهذره بخشندگی به بدشانسها هستش اگر دوستش داشتید توی کامنتهای این پست بگید تا الان چندبار رادیانس براتون فعال شده و چقدر ازش راضی هستین Channel: @Genshin_Impact_Irani Our Team: @GameVidiaIR
👍113❤11
Signed PARSAW75
‼️این توضیحی هستش که از نتایج نزدیک 4 میلیون ویش نزدیک دوسال پیش بدست اومد اما توضیحات دیگهای هم برای این مکانیک گذاشتن مثل اینکه لوز اول 45/55 هستش بعدی 75/25 آخری 100% رادیانس فعال میشه. توی پست اول هم گفتم که هویو خود این مکانیک رو خیلی خوب برای ما توضیح نداده و صرفا توضیحاتش میتونن از تستها و حدسیات بدست بیان توضیحی که من دادم از شخصی در ردیته که منابعش رو که اتفاقا چینی هم هستن داده و صحبتهاش رو کامل گفته ب…
❤83👍5😭4
Signed PARSAW75
#Guide ‼️عملکرد: در تعداد لوز 0: هیچ رادیانسی فعال نمیشه و شما یک 50/50 عادی رو پیش رو دارید که اگر لوز بشید تعداد لوزتون یکی بالا میره در تعداد لوز 1: هیچ رادیانسی فعال نمیشه و شما یک 50/50 عادی رو پیش رو دارید که اگر لوز بشید تعداد لوزتون یکی بالا میره و اگر وین بشید تعداد لوزتون یکی کم میشه. در تعداد لوز 2: شما شانس کمی برای فعال شدن رادیانس دارید. میزان این شانس خیلی معلوم نیست ولی تخمینش زدن که 5% شانس فعال ش…
😭91❤13👍6
Signed PARSAW75
#Guide ‼️شمارش لوزها: بازی تعداد لوزهای شما روی بنر کارکتر رو میشمره. از 0 تا 3 تا لوز میتونید داشته باشید. برای همه اول تعداد لوزها 1 هستش نه 0. میدونم عجیبه ولی اینجوریه. هربار که وین بگیرید یکی از تعداد لوزهای شما کم میشه و هربار که لوز بشید یکی به تعداد لوزهای شما اضافه میشه. تعداد لوزهای شما روی شانس شما در فعال کردن رادیانس تاثیر دارن. مکانیک رادیانس فقط توی 50/50 ها فعال میشه و زمانی که گارانتی هستید حساب نم…
🤯100❤14👍5😭4🌚2
Signed PARSAW75
#Guide ‼️یکی از پیچیدهترین و عجیبترین مکانیکهای بازی مکانیک Capturing Radiance هستش که وقتی توی بنر شخصیت ویش میزنید ممکنه فعال بشه و یک وین قطعی بهتون بده. چون هویو هیچوقت این مکانیک رو برای ما توضیح نداد مکانیک رادیانس توضیحات مختلفی داره که من قراره اون توضیحی که با استفاده از تعداد زیادی آزمون و خطا به دست اومده رو بهتون توضیح بدم. Channel: @Genshin_Impact_Irani Our Team: @GameVidiaIR
❤120🤔12👍3🔥2🫡1
Signed PARSAW75
⬅️ وارد دنیــایی شو که فقط اوتاکوهای واقعـی بلدن پیداش کنن... یه ورس متفاوت 🤚 ⬅️ یه دنیای پر از شگفتی و چیزای عجیب و غریب، اگه میترسی ریسک نکن چون دیگه برنمیگردی 😈 ⬅️ حتی چیـزایی که نمـیدونستی دنبـالشون میگردی، اینجان؛ منتـظرن که پیداشون کنی 🩸 ⬅️ هرچی که بخوای؛ حتی اونایی هم که اسمشونو نمیدونی؛ پس تو هم بیـــا تو یه بُعد دیگه 😭
🐳8❤3🕊2🤯2🍓1
Signed 𝓶𝓸𝓱𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓭
#پاسخ_به_سوالات_شما چون چندباری اینو توی کامنتها دیدم بزارین تکرار کنم. تفاوت ست Guilded Dreams با ست Scarlet Proof و دو قطعه المنتالمستری دو قطعه المنتالمستری بهشدت کمه. محاسبات مختلف اعداد متفاوتی از تفاوتشون درآوردن ولی براساس محاسبات تئوریکرفترهای معتبرتری مثل زجف تفاوت این 3 تا حالت باهم توی دمیج تیم تقریبا 1% یا کمتره. بنابراین هرکدوم از این سه حالت که تا الان دادید یا هر کدوم از این سه حالت که ازش آرت…
👍42❤6
Signed PARSAW75
#Guide ‼️آموزش بیلد Yumemizuki Mizuki استلار سوئرل از سایت کچینگ مینز. نکتهای که راجب ستهای میزوکی هست اینه که: زمانی از ستهای غیر از VV استفاده میکنید که شخص دیگهای توی تیم باشه که ست VV رو بگیره مثل سوکروز یا فاروزان کانس 6 که تقریبا دریک حد برای میزوکی خوب هستن. البته اگر همین الانم VV برای میزوکی فارم کردید میتونید به فاروزان یا سوکروز ست چهارستارهی Instructor بدید که در این حالت خیلی دمیج از نمیدید نسبت…
❤61👍1
Signed PARSAW75
#Guide ‼️آموزش بیلد تراولر کرایو در دو حالت سابدیپیاس تیمهای استلار سوئرل و دیپیاس تیمهای استلار کانداکت نکتهای که برای ستهای تیمهای استلار سوئرلش هست اینه که زمانی از ست Furnace استفاده میکنید که کسی مثل اودت توی تیم نباشه که این ست رو بگیره Source: KQM Channel: @Genshin_Impact_Irani Our Team: @GameVidiaIR
❤60👍3🔥2
Signed PARSAW75
Showing the 12 most recent of 412 posts we hold for @genshin_impact_irani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@genshin_impact_irani edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Genshin.IR” (@genshin_impact_irani), 20,217 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/genshin_impact_irani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.