Channel
@geneticsheart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
441subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003512911270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geneticsheart |
| Description | Официальный канал II Конгресса «Генетика и Сердце» Платформа для диалога о современных методах диагностики, лечения и профилактики ССЗ. Регистрация: https://cs.hse.ru/geneticsheart2026/registration Сайт: https://cs.hse.ru/geneticsheart2026/ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 7 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geneticsheart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 441 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 441 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 7 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
178 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 32.6% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5418135264339988875 | 24 | 13.5% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 12.4% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 6.18% | |
| custom 5427345155986328910 | 8 | 4.49% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 3.37% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 2.25% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.562% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 16 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Два дня интенсивной науки, дискуссий и обмена опытом позади. Собрали главные итоги в одной карточке ☺️ Благодарим всех, кто был с нами — Вы сделали это событие живым и по-настоящему рабочим! Больше подробностей о том, как прошел конгресс – в итоговой статье ☺️ #ГенетикаИСердце
❤10👍7🔥4
Время идет, впечатления остаются! Смотрите, как прошли два дня конгресса ☺️ Мы видим ваши вопросы в комментариях, поэтому следите за новостями. Скоро вернемся с важной информацией. #ГенетикаИСердце
❤11👍6🔥3👏1😍1
☺️ Конгресс завершён, но общение продолжается! ☺️В День российской науки мы подвели яркий итог: более 30 докладов, спикеры из Великобритании, Испании и Китая и невероятная ценность живого диалога. ☺️ Благодарим каждого участника за этот насыщенный день! Оставайтесь на связи, чтобы узнать больше. 📸 Фотографии двух дней смотрите здесь. ☺️ Делитесь впечатлениями и своими кадрами под этим постом! #ГенетикаИСердце
❤21custom 54181352643399888756custom 54273451559863289104⚡2👏2
☺️ В рамках первого дня конгресса прошел биоинформатический симпозиум, который открыл Михаил Гельфанд. ☺️ Обсуждались самые современные методы анализа некодирующих вариантов, модели старения и другие актуальные методы анализа генетических данных. #ГенетикаИСердце
🔥13custom 54181352643399888756⚡2
Рады приветствовать вас на втором дне конгресса! ☺️Сейчас в зале №4 идет симпозиум с докладами молодых ученых, на котором будут обсуждаться проблемы кардиопатий у детей и взрослых, наследственного амилоидоза, легочной артериальной гипертензии, а также общие вопросы для ведения всех больных с наследственными заболеваниями. Приглашаем Вас поддержать молодых учебных! #ГенетикаИСердце
🔥11👍9👏8⚡1custom 54181352643399888751
☺️Второй день работы конгресса начался с доклада "Правовое регулирование полигеномного секвенирования в клинической практике: от информированного согласия до защиты генетических данных" Анны Краевской и Михаила Кондраьева ☺️ в 9.30 начинают работать все залы в соответствии программой Конгресса ☺️ Выбирайте интересующие вас темы и присоединяйтесь #ГенетикаИСердце
❤7💘4
Первый день конгресса подошел к концу! ☺️ Благодарим всех спикеров и гостей за насыщенный день, полный профессионального диалога. Ждём вас завтра для продолжения работы. Следите за программой второго дня. ☺️Обращаем ваше внимание, что бейджи предоставляются спикерам и докладчикам, остальных участников просим отмечаться в списках зарегистрированных #ГенетикаИСердце
🔥13custom 541813526433998887511❤9custom 54273451559863289104⚡1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @geneticsheart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 677,150 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Конгресс «Генетика и Сердце»” (@geneticsheart), 441 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geneticsheart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.