Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 제네시스박 공지방

Channel

제네시스박 공지방

@genesis421

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,968subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001308149907
TypeChannel
Username@genesis421
Created20 December 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/genesis421

Growth

2,9642,9682,9667 August 2026 — 2,966 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,966 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,964 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,968 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,963–2,969 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:462,968+4
8 Aug 2026, 04:532,964-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:312,966no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:282,966first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 2,968 subscribers
Avg views / post
332
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.455%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,311
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
654.5%
👍436.4%
🔥19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @genesis421. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026

절친 여러분, 조금 전 7월 멤버십 특강 '1부'를 잘 마쳤습니다! 이번 세제개편 때문에 그런 걸까요? 사전질문과 현장질문이 역대급이었습니다! 이에 멤버십 특강 최초로, 1부에 이어 추가 2부를 곧바로 내일 오전 10시에 진행합니다! (8/8, 토요일, 오전 10시) 못다한 사전질문 피드백 그리고 현장질문을 받을 예정이니 절친 분들의 많은 참여 바랍니다. 1부 영상은 아래 참고하세요! (멤버십 가입시 곧바로 시청이 가능합니다) https://www.youtube.com/live/-MA4EA5OlRI?si=3VdLNU8djDrtV8YF

7 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC157 viewsread 8 August 2026

7월 멤버십 특강, 곧 시작합니다! ^^ 2026 세제개편 관련 상세분석 및 향후 대응 방안에 대해 다룹니다. (유튜브 멤버십 회원만 참여 가능하며, 지금 가입하시면 곧바로 참여가 가능합니다) https://youtube.com/live/-MA4EA5OlRI?feature=share

7 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTCviews —

제네시스박 공지방 pinned «바로 오늘 저녁 8시! <2026 세제개편 완벽 분석 및 주택수/금액대별 대응방안> 관련하여 유튜브 멤버십 특강을 진행합니다! 해당 내용은 유튜브 멤버십 가입(월 12,000원)하시면 곧바로 참여하실 수 있습니다! 더 자세한 내용은 아래를 참고하시기 바랍니다. 감사합니다 ^^ https://blog.naver.com/genesis421/224370804597»

7 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC244 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

바로 오늘 저녁 8시! <2026 세제개편 완벽 분석 및 주택수/금액대별 대응방안> 관련하여 유튜브 멤버십 특강을 진행합니다! 해당 내용은 유튜브 멤버십 가입(월 12,000원)하시면 곧바로 참여하실 수 있습니다! 더 자세한 내용은 아래를 참고하시기 바랍니다. 감사합니다 ^^ https://blog.naver.com/genesis421/224370804597

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC289 views1 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

올해 세제개편의 히어로는 바로 종부세(종합부동산세)! 이중 공정시장가액비율은 현행 60%에서 내년 70%로 올라가는데, '3주택자 등'은 내년 27년도 70%, 그리고 28년도는 80%까지 올라간다. 이때 3주택자 등이란, 1. 말 그대로 보유 주택수가 3채 이상인 경우 2. 2채중 1채라도 조정대상지역 주택을 보유한 경우이다. 그렇다면, 이런 경우는 어떨까? 현재 2주택인데 모두 비조정대상지역에 위치하고 있다. 그런데 이중 1채가 규제지역으로 묶이면서 조정대상지역이 되었다. 그렇다면 '3주택자 등'에 해당되어, 종부세 공정시장가액비율은 27년 70%, 그리고 28년 80%로 늘어나게 된다. 즉, 현재 비조정 2주택이라 하더라도 당장 내일 이중 한 채라도 조정으로 묶이면 종부세 세부담은 늘어나게 된다.

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC345 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

전월세 대란 우려했나…與 "비거주 1주택자 거주 요건 완화 검토" (아시아경제, 2026.08.06. 오후 3:10) - 세제개편에 나왔던 예외사유보다 더 많은 항목들이 나오지 않을까 예상해 봅니다. 계속해서 지켜 봐야 겠네요.

1👍1

6 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC324 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2026 세제개편 중 부동산 세금 관련 내용을 한 장으로 정리했습니다. 참고 바랍니다. (일부 중요도 낮다고 판단된 내용은 제외했습니다) 📌 내일(8/7, 금, 오후 8시)있을 유튜브 멤버십 특강에서 상세히 풀어봅니다. https://blog.naver.com/genesis421/224367497841

5 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC361 viewsread 8 August 2026

세제개편, 향후 2가지 포인트 1. 본 내용은 '정부안'으로 국회 최종 통과가 되어야 합니다. 물론 국회 다수당이 현재 여당이라 별다른 이슈 없을 것 같습니다만, 일부 내용 수정 여부가 관건입니다. 2. 본법 통과 이후, 이를 바탕으로 한 시행령 개정을 잘 봐야 합니다. 지금 말씀드리기엔 좀 그렇지만 몇 가지 이슈되는 부분들이 이후 시행령 개정에서 어떻게 될지 좀 의문입니다. 앞으로 이 2가지, 잘 체크하시기 바랍니다.

5 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC351 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

부부공동명의인 경우 종부세 공제액 1. 각각 공제받는 경우 - 실거주인 경우, 각각 9억씩 공제 (총 18억) - 비거주인 경우, 각각 4억씩 공제 (총 8억) 2. 특례 신청시 (한 명인 것처럼 계산시) - 실거주인 경우, 14억 + 세액공제 - 비거주인 경우, 9억 결국, 실거주이면서 세액공제 받는 경우가 더 유리할 수 있음. 단, 부부공동명의인 경우 1주택 특례 신청 가능하나 반대로 단독명의는 부부공동명의처럼 각각 공제는 불가능 (뭐가 이렇게 어렵냐...)

🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC344 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

오늘도 감사하게도 SBS <뉴스헌터스> 출연하였습니다. 여러분들도 잘 아시는 김인만 소장님과 함께해서 더욱 든든하고 편한 그런 시간이었어요! 😊 이번 세제개편 내용이 워낙 방대하고 복잡해서 모든 내요을 말씀드릴 순 없었지만, 제 나름 중요하다고 생각하는 부분을 콕! 집어 말씀드렸습니다! 본방 사수해주신 분들께 오늘도 감사 말씀드립니다! 🥰 해당 영상은 아래에서 보실 수 있습니다! https://www.youtube.com/live/S8d3-7FAZTA?si=tX2x1QfcTYPGMXQ1&t=95

4 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC352 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[긴급] 세무대응 세미나 X 이상우 대표님 (8/12, 수요일) 2026 세제개편 관련, 이상우 대표님과 긴급 세무대응 세미나를 진행합니다! 총 3시간 동안 진행하구요, 전반부는 제가 이번에 나온 세제개편 관련하여 꼭 필요한 내용 위주로 완벽 분석을 합니다. 이후 세금 정책을 고려한 부동산 투자전략 관련하여 이상우 대표님과 대담회 형식으로 진행을 합니다. "수익이 있어야 절세도 가능하다!" 제가 늘 강조드리는 내용입니다. 세금에 대해 공부하는 것은, 합법적인 범위 내에서 절세하는 것도 좋지만 더 나아가 자산관리, 자산증식을 어떻게 하는게 유리한지 그 방향을 잡기 위함도 있습니다. 예를 들어, 이번 세제개편 내용 중 말소임대주택에 대해 처분기한이 있습니다. 저 역시 주택임대사업자이고, 이런 물건이 좀 있어서 미리미리 기회가 될 때마다

4 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC374 viewsread 8 August 2026

조금 후 유튜브 라이브 진행합니다 ^^ https://youtube.com/live/_YNRA03mZ_4?feature=share

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @genesis421. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,419,931 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“제네시스박 공지방” (@genesis421), 2,968 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/genesis421.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.