International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 95 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,556–1,704 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 16:17
1,573
-3
6 Nov 2026, 06:55
1,576
-8
2 Nov 2026, 22:26
1,584
-1
31 Oct 2026, 05:56
1,585
-24
27 Oct 2026, 20:38
1,609
-21
24 Oct 2026, 20:47
1,630
-24
22 Oct 2026, 00:45
1,654
-32
18 Oct 2026, 23:17
1,686
-1
16 Oct 2026, 00:49
1,687
+5
12 Oct 2026, 16:46
1,682
+12
5 Oct 2026, 22:39
1,670
+11
28 Sept 2026, 20:42
1,659
+10
15 Sept 2026, 18:57
1,649
+6
11 Sept 2026, 17:00
1,643
+5
2 Sept 2026, 12:24
1,638
+4
30 Aug 2026, 06:14
1,634
+2
26 Aug 2026, 22:48
1,632
+6
20 Aug 2026, 13:05
1,626
+4
17 Aug 2026, 11:16
1,622
+2
10 Aug 2026, 17:36
1,620
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
22s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
53 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23
43.4%
👍
23
43.4%
custom 5440547266978937888
2
3.77%
❤🔥
2
3.77%
👏
2
3.77%
🙏
1
1.89%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣 This channel is being suspended to strengthen our presence on other platforms
We are suspending the English-language channel on Telegram. We are currently focusing on developing the key media platforms of the BRICS Expert Council-Russia to provide our audience with more context, diverse formats, and in-depth coverage.
Thank you to everyone who followed the channel, engaged with our content, and helped make it tru…
🗣️ Brazil’s Electoral Circle and the Prospects for Future Engagement to the BRICS Initiative
For much of the past two years, the Lula administration has positioned Brasília as a champion of the Global South, leveraging the BRICS platform to advocate for a less dollar-dependent international financial architecture and a recalibration of global governance.
Nevertheless, beneath this rhetoric of multipolarity, the cur…
From Prevention to Longevity: Experts Discussed the Active Ageing Agenda Across BRICS Countries
The roundtable discussion "From Prevention to Longevity: National Active Ageing Programmes in BRICS Countries", organised by the BRICS Expert Council-Russia under the auspices of the Civil BRICS Council, brought together representatives of the academic community, healthcare systems, public institutions, and leading specia…
🗣️ CyberPeace, BRICS, and a New Framework for Digital Trust
In the contemporary international order, cyberspace has emerged as both an enabler of unprecedented economic integration and a domain of strategic contestation. The architecture of the digital world, once viewed as a neutral infrastructure for innovation and exchange, is now deeply intertwined with questions of sovereignty, power, and systemic risk. As such…
In touch with BRICS: news digest
Your quick rundown of the most important BRICS updates
✔Uzbekistan has joined the New Development Bank
✔The BRICS Declaration on Strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods has been signed
✔At a meeting of the Counter-Terrorism Working Group, the BRICS countries discussed the monitoring of suspicious transfers
✔Malaysia’s participation in #BRICS could strengthen the coun…
Roundtable Discussion on Prospects for Cooperation Between BRICS Civil Societies Held in Moscow
On May 14, the Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation hosted a roundtable discussion organised by the BRICS Expert Council-Russia entitled "Forming a platform for civil society interaction in BRICS countries: institutional mechanisms, best practices, and prospects for joint projects". Held under the auspices of the Civil…
In touch with BRICS: news digest
Your quick rundown of the most important BRICS updates
✔BRICS Ministers of Foreign Affairs adopt joint statement following meeting in New Delhi
✔BRICS Foreign Ministers advocate for UN reform
✔India’s PM commends BRICS as important platform for cooperation between emerging nations
✔Zimbabwe begins negotiations on joining the New BRICS Development Bank
✔New technology funding pla…
🗣️ Trade Policy of Russia and Its EAEU Partners as a Factor in Shaping BRICS Trade Regime
Over the past decades, regional trade agreements (RTAs) have evolved from a "supplement" to the multilateral trading system into one of the main instruments of foreign economic policy for many countries. According to the WTO's statistical database (RTA‑IS), as of February 2026, 380 RTAs were in force and operational worldwide. …
🌍 Where is the world heading? Multipolar chaos
➖The emergence of multipolarity is the most important trend in global affairs. In fact, by and large multipolarity has already arrived. The diverse countries that make up the World Majority, which today account for the lion’s share of the global economy, are pursuing increasingly independent and proactive foreign policies, putting forward their own initiatives to resolv…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @generationbrics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@generationbrics named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@pokoleniebrics named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TV BRICS @tvbrics · 21,587 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 September 2026
BRICS + news | БРИКС + новости @newsbrics · 41,843 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Курск Типичный @kurskr · 100,054 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 October 2026
Open Doors Russian Scholarship Project @opendoorsrussianscholarship · 20,818 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Generation BRICS” (@generationbrics), 1,573 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/generationbrics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.