Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for gemmsen

Channel

gemmsen

@gemmsenn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

11,141subscribers

+3,158 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002439724235
TypeChannel
Username@gemmsenn
Description18+ критика не приветствуется
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gemmsenn

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,98311,1479,5656 August 2026 — 7,983 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,983 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,063 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,102 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,110 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,121 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,118 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,126 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,141 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,144 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,276 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,775 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,908 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,079 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,211 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,489 subscribers6 October 2026 — 9,552 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,545 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,044 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,065 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,079 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,085 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,094 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,097 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,096 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,110 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,109 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,111 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,101 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,102 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,107 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,105 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,116 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,114 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,108 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,114 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,117 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,122 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,124 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,123 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,147 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,141 subscribers11,1416 August 20269 November 2026
42 measurements spanning 95 days, net +3,158. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,508–11,622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 15:4811,141-6
8 Nov 2026, 11:0011,147+24
7 Nov 2026, 08:0911,123-1
6 Nov 2026, 08:0811,124+2
5 Nov 2026, 05:4511,122+5
4 Nov 2026, 03:1411,117+3
3 Nov 2026, 05:2711,114+6
2 Nov 2026, 02:1111,108-6
31 Oct 2026, 03:1511,114-2
30 Oct 2026, 00:0911,116+11
28 Oct 2026, 22:4811,105-2
27 Oct 2026, 23:5011,107+5
27 Oct 2026, 01:0711,102+1
25 Oct 2026, 23:2811,101-10
25 Oct 2026, 00:4011,111+2
23 Oct 2026, 23:3611,109-1
23 Oct 2026, 00:5711,110+14
21 Oct 2026, 20:3811,096-1
20 Oct 2026, 15:2011,097+3
19 Oct 2026, 13:4811,094first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.8%
avg views ÷ 11,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held50 (22 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total160,150
Reactions total19,872
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 09:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
499
Videos
3
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

48,092 reactions across 49 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤28,19758.6%
🔥4,81510.0%
🍓4,3088.96%
💘3,3336.93%
🥰2,4195.03%
💋1,4943.11%
🙏5521.15%
🕊5381.12%
🤩3810.792%
😍3140.653%
🍌3090.643%
💯2860.595%
🎉2840.591%
😭2650.551%
🌭1900.395%
💔1840.383%
😱1010.21%
👍980.204%
🤣240.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,092 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
181
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 49 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
63
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gemmsenn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 00:00 UTC≈3,120 views1,286 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓754❤327💋174🍌29🕊2

8 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC≈4,980 views1,626 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

wip

❤1,130💯239🔥198🍓47🕊12

7 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTC≈9,690 views1,249 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤863💘228🥰122🕊31🎉5

6 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC≈6,860 views586 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @eye_beholderPhoto

gemmsen представит свой взгляд на понятие ➡️ ностальгия

❤402💘103🕊46🍓33💋2

2 Nov 2026, 09:36 UTC≈10,000 views2,079 reactions4 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

якудза 0 фанарт

❤1,360🥰388💘280🔥36😍15

29 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC≈12,100 views1,495 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

еще кирю якудза 0 вип

💘964❤333🍓176😱15💋7

29 Oct 2026, 19:43 UTC≈9,860 views947 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @NAUSHKO_artPhoto

Автопортрет углём 80х100 см Меня одолевает гигантизм 🪷

❤664🍓157🔥102💘20😱4

26 Oct 2026, 00:28 UTC≈13,100 views2,295 reactions7 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

фанарт к якудзе

❤1,530🔥398💋301🍌36💘30

25 Oct 2026, 18:40 UTC≈10,900 views671 reactionsread 11 November 2026

хочу сделать 6 персонажей челлендж, напишите, кого хотели бы. реальные люди тоже можно я возьму отсюда 3 и 3 из инсты по реквестам

💋427❤145🕊65💘25🍓9

25 Oct 2026, 12:56 UTC≈11,700 views1,523 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔞 легкое NSFW АААА, такую красоту нарисовали😭 спасибо большое зомби, хочу это везде себе на обои

❤1,020🍓275🔥175🥰45🎉8

23 Oct 2026, 11:33 UTC≈9,340 views922 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

таких чудесных микки нарисовали🩷 я обожаю, спасибо большое 1. t.me/ludmkk 2. https://t.me/horrortrashcan

🙏541❤221🔥131🍓19🌭10

20 Oct 2026, 01:05 UTC≈11,600 views2,293 reactions21 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#ос

❤1,510🍓408🔥302💘49🥰24

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @gemmsenn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @gemmsenn as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“gemmsen” (@gemmsenn), 11,141 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gemmsenn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.