Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐†๐ž๐ฆ ๐‚๐ซ๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ญ๐จ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Channel

๐†๐ž๐ฆ ๐‚๐ซ๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ญ๐จ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

@gemccrypto

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,262subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002147267218
TypeChannel
Username@gemccrypto
CreatedBetween 1 April 2024 and 30 September 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gemccrypto

Growth

1,2621,2781,2707 August 2026 โ€” 1,278 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 1,278 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 1,269 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 1,262 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 1,260โ€“1,280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:181,262-7
11 Aug 2026, 01:311,269-9
7 Aug 2026, 22:471,278no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:551,278first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
34.2%
avg views รท 1,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
432
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.644%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (31 July 2026 โ€“ 5 August 2026)
Views total7,769
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค932.1%
๐Ÿคฃ828.6%
๐Ÿ‘517.9%
๐Ÿ‘ป27.14%
๐Ÿ˜27.14%
๐Ÿค“13.57%
๐Ÿค”13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC270 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bs y krte rho jb tk Kuch achaa na mile Card bina kyc wala lena bcz tax

๐Ÿค“1

5 Aug 2026, 04:26 UTC317 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://fkrt.to/A8gq0Q2p https://fkrt.to/RjT6K116 500 off on vivo oppo phones

๐Ÿคฃ6๐Ÿ˜2

4 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC338 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

6 7 daily ese claim hoga Group join kr lo not force https://telegram.me/sixsevenclub_bot/app?startapp=ref_1782f6b4

3 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC370 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Redotpay me 10$ fee jayegi 5$ bonus mil jayega account create krte hi 2 $ discount apply this code Virtual Card 20% Off Code๏ผš20OFF2026 Physical Card 20% Off Code๏ผšRedot2026 If you apply offers 5$ new account+ 2$ discount promo code card charges is 3$ after all โœ”๏ธ Other crypto card available also free buy I have not information about it

โค3

3 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC377 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Star loot again working in old account jinme country error tha ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ Post https://t.me/gemccrypto/4179

โค4๐Ÿคฃ2

3 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC364 viewsread 7 August 2026

Share Swiggy offer link in comment and help โœ”๏ธโฌ‡๏ธ

31 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC579 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://fkrt.co/U1jI7e Flipkart gift card 10k @ 9500 / 9400 Shopping karni h to buy kr lo ๐Ÿฅน cred upi โœ”๏ธ

๐Ÿ‘ป2

31 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC556 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ABCD Se kisi Bhi Merchant QR Code Ko 351 INR Bhejo โ‚น100 Cashback Instant เคฌเคฟเคฒเค•เฅเคฒ Free Me Ager Apko Offer Mila Tab Krna T&C Apply

โค1

31 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC440 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Jab wallet mai balance add na ho To ye try karo. ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

31 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC419 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

โœ… Instant Paying Loot Do Fast ๐ŸŸข Click The Link : https://telegram.me/sixsevenclub_bot/app?startapp=ref_1782f6b4 โžก๏ธ Click 67 Balling Game โžก๏ธ Agr Saare Balls Basket Main Daal Diye Toh Instant Withdrawal Amount Milenge Not Bonus & Instant Profit

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @gemccrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,332,764 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐†๐ž๐ฆ ๐‚๐ซ๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ญ๐จ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณโ€ (@gemccrypto), 1,262 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gemccrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.