Channel
@gefr_ne
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,067subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001391171560 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gefr_ne |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gefr_ne |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 1,067 | +20 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 1,047 | no change |
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:48 | 1,047 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 22 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (22 September 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 102 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
西海岸新鲜出炉 玩家反馈 玩的就是西海岸 猛猛干 —————————————— （西海岸）大水模板返🔼◀️◀️ 周期16-30号😀😀😀 主推西海岸🔗 23xhw.top 周期1000充值 3000 电子流水（充值天数≥3天） 秒返😀◀️◀️通过在返▶️🔁🔁 周期😀😀号截止 倒计时😀天 充值不够抓紧时间补 参加过的多活跃即可 可介绍朋友来打 返现给你 注⚠️截止多ip多账号参加
👍2
你们玩平台的时候一定不要注册多个账号， 如果是用网页或者是App玩的，找不到登录链接了可以找我来要 或者是群里面直接发平台的名字，机器人会把通用链接发出来， 不要去重新注册，不然到时候就是多账号后，后续人头费不会审核通过的
西海岸新鲜出炉 玩家反馈 猛猛干大水 放水五个亿 —————————————— （西海岸）大水模板返🔼◀️◀️ 开业放水五个亿🧧猛猛干 周期16-30号😀😀😀 主推西海岸🔗 23xhw.top 周期1000充值 3000 电子流水（充值天数≥3天） 秒返😀◀️◀️通过在返▶️🔁🔁 （返现🔼◀️◀️仅限第一个周期） 可介绍朋友来打 返现给你 注⚠️截止多ip多账号参加
❤1
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @gefr_ne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PG电子之家（彩金/注册送）” (@gefr_ne), 1,067 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gefr_ne.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.