неожиданно...

Channel
Geek betting ⚽️🏀🥎
@geekbetting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002418519235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geekbetting |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geekbetting |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 41 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 37 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
✅♨️Live. Футбол. Китай. Суперлига. Тяньцзинь Цзиньмэнь Тайгер — Далянь Инбо Тотал голов (<2,5) - кф 1,72
✅♨️Live. Футбол. Россия. 1-я лига. Уфа — Родина Москва Тотал угловых (<9,5) - кф 1,72
❎ ♨️Live. ITF Польша Орлов В vs Файта П Победа Файта - кф 2,2
✅♨️Live. ITF Швеция Вейс vs Славич Тотал геймов (<19) - кф 1,71
❎ такое тоже случается. Немного не дожали, не хватило всего 3 очков. Жаль, но ничего, впереди еще много хороших ставок.
❎ ♨️Live. Баскетбол. Китай. Китай. CDBL Сучжоу Кэтс vs. Шанхай Файвс Тотал общий (>186.5) - кф 1.89
✅♨️Live. Баскетбол. Австралия. Финал Иллаварра Хоукс vs. Канберра Ганнерс Тотал общий (<190) - кф 2.13
🚀 Прогноз на матч Франция. Лига 1: Монако vs Гавр| 16.08.2025 ⏰ Старт в 20:00 (МСК) Тотал угловых (>8,5) - кф 1,69 В 4 из 5 последних матчей Лиги 1 у Монако суммарно регистрировалось минимум 8 угловых. Команда активно использует фланги с участием Головина и Минамино, что часто приводит к угловым после сейвов вратарей или блокированных ударов. Гавр в 9 из 11 предыдущих матчей чемпионата проигрывал по угловым соперни…
🚀 Прогноз на матч Мальорка vs Барселона| 16.08.2025 ⏰ Старт в 20:30 (МСК) Фора (-1) Барселона - кф 1,65 Барселона в предсезонке забила 20 голов в 4 матчах (победы 3:1, 7:3, 5:0, 5:0), атака с Ямалем и Рафиньей выглядит неудержимой. Мальорка без ключевых игроков: вратарь Грейф и полузащитник Коста травмированы, а оборона пропускала в 80% предсезонных матчей. В личных встречах Барселона выиграла 4 из 5 последних матч…
🚀 Прогноз. Киберспорт (CS2): BLAST Bounty Fall 2025 | 16.08.2025 MOUZ vs Team Spirit ⏰ Старт в 17:00 (МСК) Победа Победа Team Spirit - кф 1.58 Spirit выиграли 7 из 12 личных встреч, включая разгром MOUZ (0:3) на IEM Cologne 2025. Отличная форма: 4 победы в последних 5 матчах. MOUZ уязвимы против агрессивных команд (проигрыш Spirit и Astralis в августе) .
✅♨️Live. Хоккей. Австралия. AIHL. Сентраль Кост Райнос - Брисбен Лайтнинг Тотал голов (>7,5) - кф 1,72
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @geekbetting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,518,738 of 1,570,256entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Geek betting ⚽️🏀🥎” (@geekbetting), 41 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geekbetting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.