Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Martin Geddes Channel

Channel

Martin Geddes Channel

@geddes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,865subscribers

-617 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001198318740
TypeChannel
Username@geddes
DescriptionI mostly reshare interesting content here… find me back on Twitter at https://twitter.com/martingeddes
Created11 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/geddes

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,86514,48214,173.56 August 202610 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net -617. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,772–14,575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 01:2013,865-8
8 Nov 2026, 19:1013,873-8
7 Nov 2026, 08:4913,881-8
6 Nov 2026, 07:4813,889+1
5 Nov 2026, 08:0513,888-7
4 Nov 2026, 07:4813,895-7
3 Nov 2026, 09:5513,902-2
2 Nov 2026, 08:3913,904-2
1 Nov 2026, 08:3413,906-3
30 Oct 2026, 10:3113,909-2
28 Oct 2026, 05:4813,911-11
27 Oct 2026, 03:0813,922-3
26 Oct 2026, 01:2813,925-10
24 Oct 2026, 01:2613,935-5
23 Oct 2026, 04:2113,940-2
22 Oct 2026, 06:4913,942-5
20 Oct 2026, 22:5913,947-7
19 Oct 2026, 18:5613,954-4
18 Oct 2026, 21:4813,958-3
17 Oct 2026, 22:5413,961first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.7%
avg views ÷ 13,865 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,430
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held67 (22 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total34,250
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 07:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,700
Videos
≈2,370
Links
≈6,770

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
3m 16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 23:06 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 11 November 2026

What if the election wasn't a defeat, but a trap sprung? The more blatant the cheating, the greater the exposure. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/oh-what-a-wonderful-sting-operation

3 Nov 2026, 21:29 UTC≈7,080 viewsread 11 November 2026

What if today's election isn't really about who wins, but who controls the system that decides? https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-election-beyond-politics

28 Oct 2026, 16:49 UTC≈7,720 viewsread 11 November 2026

Nine years of Q, nearly 16,000 calendar entries, and one peculiar archive of date-based intelligence. I'm releasing the raw data for researchers, journalists, and historians to explore. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/a-pequliar-calendar-covering-nine

22 Oct 2026, 16:33 UTC≈3,250 viewsread 11 November 2026

The Great Awakening isn't about being right — it's about learning to be competently wrong, without losing your mind or your humanity. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-great-awakening-is-a-departure

21 Oct 2026, 18:29 UTC≈3,660 viewsread 11 November 2026

What if Q’s most consequential innovation wasn’t what people believed, but how they learned to investigate, organise, and judge what is true? A deep dive into fifth-generation warfare and the architecture of public recognition. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/what-the-q-corpus-reveals-about-fifth

20 Oct 2026, 12:16 UTC≈2,400 viewsread 11 November 2026

1,749 tweets. Seven years of Q and QAnon commentary. My historical record is now open for independent scrutiny — by supporters, critics, journalists and researchers alike. Judge the evidence for yourself. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/my-q-and-qanon-tweets-as-a-historical

19 Oct 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 11 November 2026

An aircraft can fly without being airworthy, and a court can issue an order without delivering justice — so why don't we apply safety engineering to law? https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/lexineering-the-missing-engineering

15 Oct 2026, 16:04 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 11 November 2026

What happens when old friends still recognise your face, but no longer recognise your world? https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-breakdown-of-societal-recognition

14 Oct 2026, 20:46 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 11 November 2026

Maybe there always comes a point in life where unexpected change catches you off-guard? https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/when-did-staines-become-croydon-and

13 Oct 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 11 November 2026

Am I allowed a night off? https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/heavens-above-literally

10 Oct 2026, 22:58 UTC≈2,140 viewsread 11 November 2026

A court can close a case without resolving the reality beneath it. What does the Bible have to say about that? https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/the-boundary-stone-the-scales-and

6 Oct 2026, 18:26 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 11 November 2026

What happens when law reaches an answer that no longer depends on reality? A tiny strip of English farm lane exposes a much bigger failure mode of justice. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/even-good-people-can-functionally

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @geddes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

✞ Dr C ✞
@InevitableET · 37,604
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Martin Geddes Channel” (@geddes), 13,865 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geddes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.