最后几天开课🀄️
👍1

Channel
@gdjdgjdj668
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
775subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004215436814 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gdjdgjdj668 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gdjdgjdj668 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:58 | 775 | +7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:22 | 768 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 October 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,350 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
最后几天开课🀄️
👍1
艾米的朋友圈 pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
恩施开课了宝宝们
晚上路过恩施呆几天哟,恩施的宝宝们晚上见
【验证留名】:大卫 【评价时间】:2026-10-30 【服务评分】:9 【人照评分】:9 【描述过程】:[体验过程):闲来无聊,躺床上刷手机,意外发现刚上榜的艾米老师,一眼甜妹形象立马吸引到我的眼球,询问了一下,居然发现真的是刚到宜昌,果断约上头课。老师教室在公寓,停车方便,进入教室,果然没有让我失望,人照真的差异不大,看到老师身材一览无疑,皮肤白,翘屁股,大长腿,看到老师鸡巴就不自觉挺了起来。 缴费洗澡,老师脱光了一起洗,小腹非常平坦,没有一丝赘肉,完美身材啊。洗好上床,老师开始服务,非常细致的舔胸,然后舔蛋,做的很耐心,舔了好长时间。然后开始舔鸡巴,各种姿势各种花样舔了好久,然后开始深喉,每次都深喉到底,还会喉咙里停住5秒钟,真的是爽到了。然后我来舔老师,光滑的小穴特别耐看,没有异味,非常多汁,舔了几分钟后带套开始啪啪。 老师的小穴挺紧致,先是传教,一边跟老师舌吻和吃老师的奶子,还可以把玩老师的大长腿和脚脚。然后换后入…
❤4
艾米的朋友圈 pinned Deleted message
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
开课了,开课了
荆州出击报告 🔢:【人照对版几成】:9成 ⭐:【颜值评价】:⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 👦🏻:【验证留名】:#罗大哥 ⌚:【验证时间】:#16:30 👧🏻:【妹子艺名】:#艾米 📱:【联系方式】: @aimi6683 🗺️【所在位置】:#荆州 ⚠️【安 全 性】:安全第一 💰【修车水费】:#1200PP 🆙【身高体重】:#165CM 🥩【胖瘦赘肉】:#均匀 🐻【凶器罩杯】:#C罩杯 👩🏻【老师类型】:嫩妹,精神小妹,女友,御姐,少妇,熟女都有,自己挑 🤝【服务类型】:配合,半自动 😃【服务态度】:帝王般,一般,比较配合 ❌⭕【优点缺点】:评价↓ ❌缺点:暂无缺点 ⭕优点: 今天下午闲来无事翻着手机突然刷到艾米老师,一直听说老师的口活好,所以突发奇想就给老师发了信息约了位,来到了老师的开课教室很温馨,老师长得也好看,挺满意的就交了水费,然后和老师一起脱衣去洗澡,没想到老师被衣服束缚的身材真好呀,腰细胸大的,让我还没开始就有点…
❤1
开课了
【时间】:2026-10-17 【老师】:艾米95 【留名】:奸-20 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:初进门,说话温柔,身材完美,态度好,一脱衣服,胸又大又挺,该有的服务都有,95老师大家都懂的口活无敌,下面非常紧,非常完美的一次出击。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gdjdgjdj668. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“艾米的朋友圈” (@gdjdgjdj668), 775 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gdjdgjdj668.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.