Channel
@gdhozel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,521subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001852700993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gdhozel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gdhozel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 1,521 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 1,524 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 1,521 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 1,522 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 1,522 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 51,872 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Tükenmişlik, kaygı, yalnızlık ve depresyon... Antik mahşerin atlıları yerini modern çağın bu dört ruhsal felaketine bıraktı. Şafak Altun yazdı: Peki, sorun gerçekten sadece "zihniyetimizde" mi, yoksa modern sistem kendi yarattığı zehrin faturasını yine bizim inançlarımıza mı kesiyor? 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
7 Ağustos 1915… İtilaf kuvvetleri Çanakkale’de sonuca ulaşmak için büyük bir taarruza girişti. Kanlısırt’tan Anafartalar’a uzanan çatışmalar, savaşın kaderini belirleyecek günleri başlattı. Mehmet Dilbaz yazdı: Birkaç gün sonra Mustafa Kemal, Conkbayırı’nda tarihin akışını değiştirecekti. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
“Çerçeve Yasa" teklifi nihayet TBMM Başkanlığına sunuldu. Teklife AK Parti, DEM Parti, MHP ve CHP milletvekilleri imza attı. Mahmut Aydın yazdı: Yeni Parti’yi kuran, “kent uzlaşısının” mimarı Özgür Özel ve arkadaşlarının ise teklife imza atmaması şaşkınlık yarattı. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
2026 YAŞ analizi: Uyum, teknolojik dönüşüm ve tecrübe Murat Yılmaz yazdı: 2026 Yüksek Askerî Şûrası kararları, yalnızca terfi ve emeklilik listesinden ibaret değil. Uzman görüşleri, TSK'da sivil denetimin güçlendiği, teknoloji odaklı dönüşümün hızlandığı ve saha tecrübesiyle gençleşme arasında yeni bir denge kurulduğunu ortaya koyuyor. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
Çip savaşı aslında yeni dünya düzeninin savaşıdır. Çünkü artık mesele "Kim daha fazla enerjiye sahip?" sorusu değil. Şafak Altun yazdı: Mesele, "Kim geleceğin zekâsını çalıştıracak altyapıyı kontrol ediyor?" sorusudur. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
İspanya’nın Kuzey Afrika’daki topraklarını hedef alan demografik komployu İsrail’in İspanya hükümetinden intikam alma yolu olarak değerlendirmek gaflet olacak, tehlikenin büyüklüğünü teşhis etmede yetersiz kalacaktır. Mehmet Kancı yazdı: Avrupa artık açıkça bir ABD-İsrail saldırısının hedefidir. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
TBMM’de dün bazı ilkler yaşandı. Mahmut Aydın yazdı: Özgür Özel, Yeni Parti Genel Başkanı sıfatıyla ilk grup konuşmasını yaparken, mutlak butlan kararı sonrası CHP Genel Başkanlığına gelen Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu da üç yıl sonra ilk kez CHP Meclis Grubunda kürsüye çıktı. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
İmparatorluğu kurtarmaya çalıştı, Trablusgarp'tan Sarıkamış'a, Berlin'den Türkistan'a uzanan çalkantılı bir hayat yaşadı. Mehmet Dilbaz yazdı: Kimilerine göre kahraman, kimilerine göre büyük bir hata yapan devlet adamı... Şehadetinin 104. yıl dönümünde Enver Paşa'nın bilinmeyen hikâyesini anlattık. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
🤮1🫡1
1492 yılında Granada’nın düşmesi ile tarihe Reconquista olarak geçen hadise, ülkede yaşayan müslümanların varlığına bir son vermişti. Nevzad Yenikişi yazdı: Elbette İslam adetleri, alışkanlıkları, Arap dilinin etkileri günümüz İspanyol kültüründe açıkça hissedilmektedir. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
❤1
Uğur Mumcu cinayetinin yeniden gündeme gelmesi dolayısıyla 1993 yılında gerçekleşen bir seri olay yeniden tartışılıyor. Murat Yılmaz yazdı: Tarih, şimdiden bugünden yazıldığı için, bugünkü bilgi ve şuurumuz geçmişteki hadiseleri yeniden düşünmeyi mümkün kılıyor. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
Tek parti dönemindeki “seçim törenleri” çok öğreticidir. Murat Yılmaz yazdı: Bu adı seçim olan ama kendisinde demokratik anlamda bildiğimiz rakiplerin olmadığı ve her şeyi tek partinin tayin ettiği garip seçim törenleri, her Cumhuriyetin neden demokrasi olmadığını başlı başına öğretmeye yeter. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
Gökyüzü karardığında savaşlar durdu, krallar korktu, insanlar bunu kıyamet alameti sandı... Mehmet Dilbaz yazdı: Peki bir Güneş tutulması gerçekten tarihin akışını değiştirebilir mi? Antik çağlardan Einstein'a, 1999 Marmara Depremi'nden günümüze uzanan çarpıcı hikâyeyi anlattık. 🔗 OKUMAK İÇİN TIKLAYIN
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gdhozel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 135,603 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“gdh+ | Özel Haber - Analiz - Yorum” (@gdhozel), 1,521 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gdhozel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.