Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GCAM Releases and devblog

Channel

GCAM Releases and devblog

@gcam_releases

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,416subscribers

-106 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225968982
TypeChannel
Username@gcam_releases
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gcam_releases

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,4167,5227,4696 August 2026 — 7,522 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,522 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,520 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,514 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,503 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,497 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,487 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,476 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,466 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,464 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,457 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,442 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,434 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,428 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,416 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,400–7,538 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:207,416-12
14 Sept 2026, 14:397,428-6
11 Sept 2026, 06:217,434-8
6 Sept 2026, 09:387,442-15
2 Sept 2026, 01:257,457-7
30 Aug 2026, 05:537,464-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:567,466-10
23 Aug 2026, 14:457,476-11
19 Aug 2026, 15:037,487-10
16 Aug 2026, 14:397,497-6
13 Aug 2026, 03:157,503-11
10 Aug 2026, 10:317,514-6
7 Aug 2026, 02:057,520-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:007,522no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:577,522first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍842.1%
🥰631.6%
🔥526.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2022 to 13 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Mar 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,240 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed H 1

13 Mar 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,270 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍1🔥1

Signed H 1

13 Mar 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,290 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Indoor sample. Now imagine how good the outdoor ones will be! (Problem is, Marco has limited access to his begonia and the cam does not work on android 11. Try and send feedback (good one or I will ban you 😜)

🔥1🥰1

Signed H 1

13 Mar 2026, 12:34 UTC≈2,340 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

#begonia #XML #AGC #BigKaka Xml for Redmi Note 8 Pro (probably won't work on other phones) by: @gasssgg This is made for AGC9.2.14_v14.0 , don't use on other versions (won't be compatible) Get the cam from here (tap the underlined "here" word, then download the first link) -The viewfinder will have a bit of lag (unfortunately), but it's the best GCam for this phone (in the creator's opinion) and he guarantees res

🔥3

Signed H 1

5 Aug 2025, 07:06 UTC≈4,470 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

Config for LMC 8.4 release 18. Used for sharp, slightly saturated pictures ideal for nature. Shoots in 64 mp by default. To get LMC, head to celsoazevedo.com and go to Hasli mods (yes, this requires the use of your eyes to read and fingers to tap blue text thingies) Samples > https://t.me/googlecameraglobal/636125?single Join @googlecameraglobal for discussion

🥰5

Signed H 1

4 Sept 2024, 18:38 UTC≈8,480 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Are you interested in seeing a comparison between Redmi Note 8 pro (stock/gcam) and iPhone 12 pro?

  1. Yes86%
  2. No14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1

Signed H 1

29 Jun 2024, 07:50 UTC≈12,000 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

#rn8p #begonia #burial10 #7.x This is not the greatest config in the world, no! This is a tribute :) See this for reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lK4cX5xGiQ (not a rickroll video, I promise) Anyways. This is the config I'm currently using on Burial 10 Works fine, colors seem good to me and the noise is quite good in my eyes (more noise than your average config). Modified small values here and there a

👍2

Signed H 1

4 Apr 2024, 17:23 UTC≈11,800 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Which one do you think is better?

  1. Smooth photos and no details, I like plastic things.30%
  2. More noise, it's more natural and I like more details.70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1

Signed H 1

4 Apr 2024, 17:22 UTC≈11,300 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Here are two images taken with two different configs. Distance, lighting, and focus are the same on both, the different is in Luma denoising... I know most people prefer noise-free photos, but this always comes at the cost of details (you can read the text better on the noisy one, plus the wall is actually textured but you can't see that well on the config with noise reduction enabled. And now comes a poll, just fo

👍1

Signed H 1

18 Nov 2023, 00:31 UTC≈14,000 viewsread 28 August 2026

Enable Auxiliary lenses on OpenCam (possibly other apps): #tutorial #root #opencam #begonia #redmi_note_8_pro OpenCam does not detect auxiliary lenses properly on stock MIUI on RN8P, so to force enable them, try the following. - Using any root explorer, go to Root/etc/device features - Make a backup of "begonia.xml" - Open "begonia.xml" - Look for the line that says "Camera_aux_package_list" - Add this line to the

Signed H 1

14 Sept 2023, 15:24 UTC≈13,900 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @googlecameraport

ℹ️ GCam 9.0 and older Android versions: While the original GCam 9.0 requires Android 14, GCam 9.0 mods should work on Android 12 and above. Those stuck on older Android versions have to use older GCam bases (v8, v7, v6).

Signed H 1

28 Jul 2023, 08:47 UTC≈18,300 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

#rn8p #begonia #BigKaka #AGC #8.x A config for BigKaka's AGC8.8.224_V4.0 Has three additional modes tuned on main cam: - Light and saturated - Black and white - Blue and red (less green) filter You can access the modes from the top right button. Other lenses are not tuned properly (and probably will never do it as I'm happy with burial 10) This config is made for my personal use, using the values I am comfortabl

👍1

Signed H 1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @gcam_releases. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Sept 2024, 18:38 UTCAnonymous Poll652 voters

Are you interested in seeing a comparison between Redmi Note 8 pro (stock/gcam) and iPhone 12 pro?

  1. Yes86%
  2. No14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Apr 2024, 17:23 UTCAnonymous Poll527 voters

Which one do you think is better?

  1. Smooth photos and no details, I like plastic things.30%
  2. More noise, it's more natural and I like more details.70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2022 to 13 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GCAM Releases and devblog” (@gcam_releases), 7,416 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gcam_releases.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.