Channel
@gb_writes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
197subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001419741500 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gb_writes |
| Created | 2 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gb_writes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 197 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 194 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 196 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 196 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,703 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 45.5% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Об общем и различном на Правом и Левом пути. Можно избаловывать себя. Жрать вместо чёрствого хлеба свежий, потом бриошь, потом артишоки с аркебузами, чёрную икру, и так без конца и края. Долгосрочный эффект один: что пёрло раньше — больше не прёт, а где искать новую пруху — опций всё меньше. Это, условно, Левый Путь — к Универсальному Удовлетворителю Желаний, у которого после каждой отрубленной головы отрастает три …
👍2💯2
...а вот Tulsa King держит марку. Слай и Шеридан — это рецепт успеха.
Захарова у Чадаева. Кринж весьма интенсивный, не хуже чем тогда на МедиаДроннице, когда они с Ашмановым срач на сцене устроили. Ну насколько же Лавров круче.
Ладно, раз уж Electric Clojure / Missionary, то и Rama тоже посмотрим... https://redplanetlabs.com/docs/~/tutorial2.html (обожемой, давно я не видел примеры кода на Java вместо Clojure =))
"Купил книжку по технике секса. Открыл — и понял: люди без фантазии писали. Первый же заголовок: введение." (ц) старый анекдот
(в чате канала — развитие темы)
Много сказано о том, что безудержный Intentional Stance, т.е. привычка спрашивать "зачем?" — есть когнитивное искажение. Даже поведение тех, кого принято считать агентами, происходит "зачем-то" очень условно. Оно происходит в лучшем случае "почему-то". Почему "в лучшем случае"? Во-первых, из-за предположительности самой каузальности как механизма. Во-вторых, по Первому Закону Ньютона: обычно просто нет причин для из…
👍1🤔1
Ещё про sentience. Помните, в прошлом веке был жанр полу-детских фильмов "уменьшиться и героически путешествовать по человеческому организму"? Вот представьте, что вы — некое многомерное существо, заинтересованное в исследовании некоторого под-мерного кусочка своего бытия. Вы не знаете про него ничего, но у вас огромные технологические возможности (примерно как у современной человеческой цивилизации, или даже ТриСоля…
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Неторопливое прослушивание Бардо Тхёдол в вольном переложении Холечека, параллельно со случайным очередным заходом на Трудную Проблему Сознания, да всё это на фоне укрепления подозрений*, что авраамические верования — это перевранные ведические, наводит на переформулировку Пари Паскаля. Для начала, расшифрую звёздочку выше: Человечество биологически возникло в Африке, а вот культурно-цивилизационно — в Индостане. До…
Так вот, Пари Паскаля. Если нет никакой реинкарнации, и sentience раз и навсегда заканчивается со смертью физического тела, то можно просто не париться ни о чём: спасение в Окончательную Смерть гарантировано, довольно скоро, может быть ускорено — избавление от всех страданий, без регистрации и СМС, free in both ways. Можно поиграться в продление жизни и победу над старостью, можно вообще всё — и ничего не имеет вообщ…
💯1
Всякую Сказку про Исполнение Желаний, будь в качестве исполнителя джинн, ифрит, золотая рыбка, Дьявол, Прогресс или сервильный GAI, можно воспринимать как буддийскую притчу, исследование собственного ума. С неизбежным итогом, который мало кто готов признавать.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gb_writes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Канал им kGBt--” (@gb_writes), 197 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gb_writes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.