Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 87 days, net -1,936. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,685–9,201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 20:48
6,975
-25
31 Oct 2026, 06:45
7,000
-43
27 Oct 2026, 23:56
7,043
-43
24 Oct 2026, 20:58
7,086
-55
22 Oct 2026, 01:20
7,141
-43
18 Oct 2026, 09:51
7,184
-50
15 Oct 2026, 08:16
7,234
-52
12 Oct 2026, 12:16
7,286
-83
5 Oct 2026, 07:55
7,369
-154
26 Sept 2026, 17:56
7,523
-147
17 Sept 2026, 17:59
7,670
-110
14 Sept 2026, 01:21
7,780
-64
10 Sept 2026, 08:16
7,844
-112
4 Sept 2026, 15:55
7,956
-69
1 Sept 2026, 05:13
8,025
-67
29 Aug 2026, 11:18
8,092
-51
26 Aug 2026, 21:07
8,143
-138
23 Aug 2026, 16:37
8,281
-356
20 Aug 2026, 09:52
8,637
-53
17 Aug 2026, 19:56
8,690
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 6,975 subscribers
Avg views / post
980
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held
25 (11 February 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total
1,959
Reactions total
81
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
20
Videos
1
Links
18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
51s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,074 reactions across 25 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
236
22.0%
👍
134
12.5%
🎉
119
11.1%
🔥
104
9.68%
💯
81
7.54%
❤🔥
77
7.17%
🤩
73
6.80%
🥰
73
6.80%
😍
66
6.15%
👎
32
2.98%
💩
21
1.96%
🤡
19
1.77%
🤬
13
1.21%
😁
5
0.466%
🤮
4
0.372%
💔
3
0.279%
🤣
3
0.279%
💊
2
0.186%
😭
2
0.186%
🍌
1
0.093%
6 further kinds
6
0.559%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,074 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔄 Обновление GazNetWork
🤖 Нейросети снова работают
Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude и другие нейросети снова открываются: и в браузере, и в приложениях. Для них есть отдельный сервер 🇺🇸 США — Нейросети.
🎮 Новые игровые серверы без рекламы
Добавили 🇩🇪 Gaming #1 и 🇵🇱 Gaming #2 специально для игр:
• низкий пинг до игровых серверов;
• широкий канал без перегрузок;
• реклама в играх полностью вырезана: никаких роликов и баннеров…
⚡️В России начались массовые блокировки VPN-сервисов — провайдеры жалуются на усиление ограничений.
Пишут, что число блокировок взлетело в разы из-за новой механики — теперь банят не отдельные IP-адреса, а целые сети сразу.
Если у вас что то отвалилось, причина скорее всего в этом.
Забирай 7 дней бесплатно — https://t.me/gaznetwork_bot?start=gaznews
🔥 Обновление GazNetWork
✅ VPN больше не нужно выключать!
Российские сервисы теперь работают прямо с включённым VPN — стабильно и без ошибок:
📦 Wildberries и Ozon
💳 Банки и оплата картой
🪪 Госуслуги
🍎 Золотое Яблоко и Lamoda
🎥 Кинопоиск
🌐 …и все остальные сайты и приложения
🛡 Отключения, которые случались раньше, исправлены
📈 Качество и скорость серверов увеличены
⚡ Включили VPN один раз — и забыли, всё работает с…
Все неполадки с обходами были решены, просьба 🔄 обновите подписку, как показано на скриншоте.
Спасибо. что остаетесь с нами!
Забирай 7 дней бесплатно — https://t.me/gaznetwork_bot?start=gaznews
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
⚡️ Zapret ВСЁ. GitHub снёс главный способ обхода блокировок
Аккаунт разработчика Flowseal полностью заблокирован — вместе с ним исчезли ВСЕ его проекты. Zapret больше не скачать.
Тысячи юзеров остались без привычного интернета буквально за одну ночь.
Но у вас есть план Б 👇
🔥 Наш VPN работает стабильно и не зависит от GitHub:
Подписка PREMIUM — всего 100 ₽/мес: полностью свободный интернет без блокировок
Пробный п…
⚡️ ВАЖНОЕ ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ В GAZNETWORK
1. Привычного списка серверов больше нет!
Теперь всё стало намного проще: достаточно выбрать режим AUTO. Неважно, какой у вас тариф — «Обход глушилок VIP 🌐», «Обход глушилок🌐» или самый базовый.
Как это работает:
• Если у вас глушат связь — автоматически подключаются специальные серверы для обхода.
• Если ограничений нет — используются обычные серверы.
В чём плюс?
Большая часть т…
С 1 мая операторы не будут взимать плату за VPN-трафик, — СМИ. Компании обратились в Минцифры с просьбой отложить введение новых правил до осени — у них не хватает времени на настройку, к тому же они всё ещё не могут корректно отличать зарубежный трафик от VPN
Ранее Минцифры предлагало взимать по 150 рублей за каждый гигабайт международного трафика.
🔥 Рынок VPN готовится к тотальным блокировкам.
Провайдеры агрессивно продают долгосрочные подписки – эксперты называют это предсмертной попыткой собрать деньги. Крупные системы процессинга уже отказывают VPN-сервисам.
Если примут закон «Антифрод-2.0», российские дата-центры будут обязаны выявлять и отключать такие серверы. Источники советуют не вестись на маркетинговые трюки.
Попробуйте → *️⃣ https://t.me/gaznetwo…
Telegram начал работать без VPN у части пользователей, сообщают СМИ.
Попробуйте → *️⃣ https://t.me/gaznetwork_bot?start=gaznews
7 Дней бесплатно.
🎉11🔥8🤩8❤🔥7💯7❤5👍5🥰5
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @gaznetw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gaz NetWork News” (@gaznetw), 6,975 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gaznetw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.