Channel
@gavrilrun
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,130subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001794680556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gavrilrun |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gavrilrun |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 1,130 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 1,134 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:54 | 1,136 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 1,141 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 1,143 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 1,148 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 1,149 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 1,149 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☯️💎🇵🇱 👕Yomif Kejelcha ran 56:51 at the 21K de Buenos Aires on Sunday, taking back a half-marathon world record he lost in March to a run that has still not been ratified. World Athletics has carried Kiplimo’s 57:20 from Lisbon as the record since March, subject to a ratification that has not arrived. Its own profile page for Kejelcha, on Sunday morning, still marked his 57:30 from Valencia as the record.
🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
Минутка радости за Рено. Каждый раз, когда вижу его прыгающим, душе приятно от мысли, что в 39 лет он все ещё выходит в сектор, наверное, по любви, а уже не ради денег. 580 вчера дал в Италии.
🇨🇳 9,39 сек на 100 м в предвариловке. Отличное набегание. Видео: CCTV
Photo, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
Я расстроен. Расстроен тем, что Одри Верро ТАК хороша. Не люблю непобедимых. Но уважаю. Сезон — на века. И женские 800 прямо сейчас являются самым горячим видом в л/а. Благодаря тому, что Верро так расцвела. Кили. Мне не хочется считать себя её фанатом, но я орал в ебучий телевизор последние 10 секунд, чтобы она додавила. Не смогла. Обидно! Но я надеюсь, что это будет мотивация, а не поломка на остаток карьеры. Н…
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
28.2 последние 200 и 61.1 — посдедний круг. Надя Баттоклетти снова выиграла ЧЕ. Бедолага Меган Кейт откатилась на восьмое место. Кейт последние 200 за 39 секунд положила.
Video, posted without a caption
ММММММ… Если в завал в финале попадут меньше трёх человек, это будет колоссальный успех.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @gavrilrun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gavril Run 𓆩♡𓆪” (@gavrilrun), 1,130 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gavrilrun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.