4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,152–4,195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:35
4,190
+17
9 Aug 2026, 22:14
4,173
+16
6 Aug 2026, 23:13
4,157
-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:32
4,160
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.9%
avg views ÷ 4,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
22 (7 June 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
10,670
Reactions total
159
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
483 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
201
41.6%
🔥
187
38.7%
🤯
62
12.8%
🕊
6
1.24%
👏
5
1.04%
😱
5
1.04%
🥰
5
1.04%
👍
3
0.621%
🗿
3
0.621%
😁
3
0.621%
🙏
2
0.414%
🆒
1
0.207%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 483reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#DerpFest #Unofficial #garnet #W #A16 #QPR2
Derpfest v16.2 | UNOFFICIAL | Android 16
Updated: 07/08/26
▪️ Download
▪️ Screenshots
▪️ Support Group
Notes:
• Based on OS3.0.5.0.WNRMIXM
• KSUN v3.3.0 & SUSFS v2.2.0 Included
• Only Use Latest FW for respective
Region's.
• Bugs ? Take a Log and Report to
Our Support group.
• Log Taking Commands & Rules.
Credits:
• Thanks To @Grewal For His Base
Tree.
• Thanks …
#Lunaris #Official #garnet #W #A16 #QPR2
LunarisAOSP v3.12 | OFFICIAL | Android 16
Updated: 02/08/26
▪️ Download
▪️ Changelog
▪️ Screenshots
▪️ Support Group
▪️ XDA
Notes:
• Based on OS3.0.5.0.WNRMIXM
• KSUN v3.3.0 & SUSFS v2.2.0 Included
• Only Use Latest FW for respective
Region's.
• Bugs ? Take a Log and Report to
Our Support group.
• Log Taking Commands & Rules.
Credits:
• Thanks To @Grewal For His Base
…
#EvolutionX #OSS #A16 #OFFICIAL
EvolutionX v11.9 | Android 16 | OFFICIAL
Updated: 22/07/26
▪️ Download
▪️ Changelog
▪️ Support
Notes:
• Includes both Gapps and Vanilla builds
• LineageOS-based source
• Signed build
• Clean flash mandatory when your build is from Evolution X 8 or lower
Credits:
• Thanks to @grewal for his base device sources
By @c0pt4n | Donate
Follow @garnet_updates
Join @garnet_community
#EvolutionX #Unofficial #garnet #C #A17 #AI
EvolutionX v12.0 | Android 17 | UNOFFICIAL
Released:15/07/26
▪️ Download
▪️ Support
Notes:
• This is a BETA build
• Based on OS3.0.5.0.WNRMIXM
• KernelSU Next v3.3.0 included
• Flash the latest firmware for your respective region
• Found a bug? DM @ghostreborn
Bugs:
• Gesture navigation may stop responding after boot
• Lock and unlock the screen to restore it
• MIUI Came…
#ROM #PORT #realmeUI #Garnet
realmeUI 7.0 | Android 16 | PORT
Updated: 12/07/26
▪️Download
▪️Bugs
▪️Credits
Changelog:
• Fixed Dynamic Island Padding
• Added Fullscreen AOD
• Corrected Poco Name Values in "About Phone" Section
• Old Changelog
Notes:
• Enable High Resolution in Display settings to fix Dynamic Island Padding
• Based on 16.0.5.701(EX01) Indonesia
• New Vendor & ODM Base Garnet OS3.0.301.0.WNRIDXM
• P…
#Lunaris #Official #garnet #W #A16 #QPR2
LunarisAOSP v3.12 | OFFICIAL | Android 16
Updated: 10/07/26
▪️ Download
▪️ Changelog
▪️ Screenshots
▪️ Support Group
▪️ XDA
Notes:
• Based on OS3.0.5.0.WNRMIXM
• KSUN v3.2.0 & SUSFS v2.1.0 Included
• Only Use Latest FW for respective
Region's.
• Bugs ? Take a Log and Report to
Our Support group.
• Log Taking Commands & Rules.
Credits:
• Thanks To @Grewal For His Base
…
#ROM #PORT #realmeUI #Garnet
realmeUI 7.0 | Android 16 | PORT
Released: 06/07/26
▪️Download
▪️Changelog
▪️Bugs
▪️Credits
Notes:
• Based on 16.0.5.701(EX01) Indonesia
• New Vendor & ODM Base Garnet OS3.0.301.0.WNRIDXM
• Ported from Realme 12 Pro+
• RealmeUI ID needed
• Decrypted
By @lolotgempley
Follow @garnet_updates
Join @garnet_community
❤9🔥1🥰1
Signed onbot
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @garnet_updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 598,429 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@garnet_updates named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@matveywashere named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@noval998 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | POCO X6 5G Updates” (@garnet_updates), 4,190 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/garnet_updates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.