Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Документальное прошлое: ГА РФ

Channel

Документальное прошлое: ГА РФ

@garf_docs

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,180subscribers

+387 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001524775837
TypeChannel
Username@garf_docs
DescriptionКанал Государственного архива Российской Федерации (ГА РФ)
Created13 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/garf_docs

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

14,500 average views per post against 14,161 subscribers — an engagement rate of 102.5%. Across the 21,335 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.84% and 23.6%, with a median of 12.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled130,670
Mature posts only102.5% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers14,161 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 21,335 channels · p10 2.94% · p25 5.84% · p50 12.1% · p75 23.6% · p90 42.5%
Position in cohort99.325th percentile · 8.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.21% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,79314,18213,987.55 August 2026 — 13,793 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,793 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,794 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,793 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,794 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,799 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,797 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,802 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,803 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,799 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,802 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,801 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,804 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,799 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,797 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,807 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,810 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,811 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,819 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,821 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,824 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,828 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,849 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,912 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,931 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,975 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,970 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,973 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,971 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,059 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,096 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,098 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,102 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,146 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,161 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,158 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,157 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,156 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,160 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,170 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,162 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,167 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,164 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,162 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,166 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,169 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,168 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,169 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,165 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,168 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,164 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,162 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,161 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,174 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,179 subscribers8 November 2026 — 14,182 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,180 subscribers14,1805 August 20269 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net +387. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,735–14,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 22:3614,180-2
8 Nov 2026, 15:0414,182+3
7 Nov 2026, 07:5914,179+5
6 Nov 2026, 08:3914,174+13
5 Nov 2026, 05:3614,161-1
4 Nov 2026, 06:4614,162-2
3 Nov 2026, 09:4014,164-4
2 Nov 2026, 09:0614,168+3
1 Nov 2026, 06:2114,165-4
30 Oct 2026, 04:0014,169+1
28 Oct 2026, 07:2614,168-1
27 Oct 2026, 04:4714,169+3
26 Oct 2026, 01:5714,166+4
25 Oct 2026, 02:2614,162-2
23 Oct 2026, 23:3814,164-3
23 Oct 2026, 00:0114,167+5
21 Oct 2026, 23:0514,162-8
20 Oct 2026, 14:3114,170+10
19 Oct 2026, 13:2714,160+4
17 Oct 2026, 11:4514,156first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
115.4%
avg views ÷ 14,180 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,400
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held28 (27 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total180,060
Reactions total540
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,600
Links
≈86

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,166 reactions across 28 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁47941.1%
👍21718.6%
😢15513.3%
❤1059.01%
🔥877.46%
😱373.17%
🤔353.00%
🤯262.23%
👏121.03%
🥰80.686%
👎50.429%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 10:31 UTC≈2,980 views39 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

«Роль пчелы в годы войны особенно возросла» Благодарность пчеловоду Ф.А-404. Оп.1. Д.99. Л.40,41. Благодарность преподавателю курсов пчеловодства при Обществе охраны природы А. Стефанову от группы выпускников. Послание составлено вскоре после завершения ВОВ и наполнено военно-патриотической риторикой, но при этом содержит некоторые сведения о роли пчеловодства в годы войны. Выпускники пишут, что «роль пчелы в годы…

😁20❤12👍7

5 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTC≈29,900 views38 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Оккупационные марки для литовских партизан. Просьба в Москву 1944г. Ф.Р5446. Оп.46а. Д.3855. Л.1,3. Просьба об особой финансовой поддержке партизанского движения, направленная в январе 1944 г. советскими и партийными властями Литвы (располагавшимися на неоккупированной территории СССР) в адрес Заместителя председателя Совнаркома СССР Николая Вознесенского. В докуменнте обращается внимание на «особые условия» партиза…

😁25👍11👎2

3 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC≈16,400 views36 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

«Для совместного удовлетворения религиозных потребностей». Переписка 1988 г. Ф.10262. Оп.1.Д.7. Л.2,6. Заявление от 1988 г. группы жителей Москвы во главе с будущим председателем Российской Христанско-демократической партии Виктором Аксючицес с просьбой передать верующим храм Михаила Архагела в Тропареве на юго-западе Москвы. Виктор Аксючиц на тот момент оставался неформальным деятелем советского религиозного движ…

👍16😁8❤5🤔4🔥3

30 Oct 2026, 07:03 UTC≈9,760 views51 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

«Знание» против Вольфа Мессинга. Переписка 1950 г. Р9547. Оп.1. Д.3086. Л.230,231,234,235. Обсуждение Обществом «Знание» в 1950 г. целесообразности лекций по разоблачению мастера «телепатии» Вольфа Мессинга, официально выступавшего в СССР с сеансами как артист эстрады. С идеей разобрать “искусство» Мессинга на популярной лекции, выступил философ-марксист Попов-Подольский. На предложение имеется отзыв известного ф…

😁33❤9👍7👏2

28 Oct 2026, 07:01 UTC≈18,200 views60 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

«Душа народа звереет». Воззвание против политических казней Ф.810. Оп.1.Д.60. Л.11. Воззвание против массовых политических казней, обращенное к депутатам Государственной думы. Документ, возможно, распространялся во время выборов во Вторую Государственную думу в 1907 г., когда в период Первой русской революции власти начали массово выносить ускоренные смертные приговоры участникам вооруженных выступлений и террори…

😢32👍17😁8❤3

26 Oct 2026, 07:03 UTC≈2,430 views45 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

«Имущество было смерзшим в глыбы». Проверка интендантств 1943 г. Ф.Р5446. Оп.65. Д.39. Л.112-116. Сообщение на имя Анастаса Микояна, отвечавшего за вопросы снабжения Красной Армии небоевым имуществом, направленное в феврале 1943 г. заместителем Народного комиссара народного контроля Поповым о результатах проверки хода ремонта обмундирования на различных фронтах и в тылу. Попов отмечает, что службы тыловых округов ф…

😱28😁6👍5🔥4❤1👎1

24 Oct 2026, 07:01 UTC≈43,200 views44 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

«Мы не должны пренебрегать даже мелочью». Проект выпуска ценных бумаг СССР. 1927г. Ф.P3316. Оп.20. Д.1038. Л.6,7. Записка наркома внутренней и внешней торговли Анастаса Микояна в адрес высших государственных и партийных руководителей от сентября 1927 г. с предложением выпуска ценных бумаг СССР для размещения на иностранных рынках. В записке Микоян объясняет, что при всей желательности привлечь иностранный капитал …

🔥19😁17👍6👎2

21 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC≈17,300 views79 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Не-царский поезд. Инструкция Керенского по перевозке императорской семьи. Ф.601. Оп.2. Д.14. Л.1,1об. Составленная и подписанная Александром Керенским 31 июля 1917г. Инструкция по перевозке бывшего императора Николая II и его семьи из Царского села к месту нового содержания в Тобольске. В инструкциии указывается, что Николай, его семья и согласившиеся их сопровождать лица числятся на положении арестованных. Движен…

😢40😁14🤔10🔥7👍5❤3

19 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC≈5,690 views41 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Пустота валютных киосков. Жалоба «Интуриста» 1934г. Ф.Р3316. Оп.27. Д.90. Л.6-7. Записка организации «Интурист», направленная в ЦИК СССР 31 января 1934 г. и касающаяся организации валютной торговли в специализированных киосках. «Интурист» сообщает, что для выполнения валютного плана нуждается в товарах «экспортного качества», чтобы реализовывать их в киосках при гостиницах и посещаемых иностранцами в ресторанах, Эт…

😁21😢13👍5❤1🤯1

15 Oct 2026, 07:04 UTC≈22,200 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Налоговые льготы блокадного Ленинграда. Переписка 1942г. Ф.А259. Оп.3. Д.1262. Л.13,13об.15. Ходатайство Исполкома Ленсовета в Совнарком РСФСР от июля 1942г. о возможности освободить от уплаты местных налогов жилищный фонд города, а также предприятия местной промышленности и культурно-бытового обслуживания. Власти блокадного города объясняют, что “поступления платежей по квартирной и арендной плате в г. Ленинграде р…

👍22🤯10😁5❤1🔥1

13 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC≈12,000 views68 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Лекции без запроса. Жалобы Павлодарских колхозов 1950г. Ф.Р9547. Оп.1. Д.3086. Л.38-43. Жалоба представителя Павлодарской области в Совете по делам колхозов при Совмине СССР В. Шелемотова на организацию работы на местах Общества по распространению политических и научных знаний (будущего Общества «Знание»). Как следует из документа, члены Общества превратили выступления фактически в систему вымогательств. Так, по утв…

😁57🤔7👏4

2 Sept 2026, 07:29 UTC≈2,340 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026

(Продолжение) Дополнительно Щелоков сообщает о лаборатории историко-георграфических и социологических исследований при Новосибирском отделении Географического общества СССР, которое занималось написанием историй богатых промышленных предприятий. Так, Норильский комбинат был готов заплатить за свою историю 110 000 рублей (перечислив 27 000 рублей аванса), а колхоз «Приамурский» - 41 000 рублей (перечислив сумму полн…

😁9👍6🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @garf_docs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Яндекс Поиск по архивам
@yandexarchives · 19,955
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 October 2026
История и истории
@historygothy · 20,837
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Документальное прошлое: ГА РФ” (@garf_docs), 14,180 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/garf_docs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.