Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
14,500 average views per post against 14,161 subscribers — an engagement rate of 102.5%. Across the 21,335 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.84% and 23.6%, with a median of 12.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
130,670
Mature posts only
102.5% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net +387. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,735–14,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 22:36
14,180
-2
8 Nov 2026, 15:04
14,182
+3
7 Nov 2026, 07:59
14,179
+5
6 Nov 2026, 08:39
14,174
+13
5 Nov 2026, 05:36
14,161
-1
4 Nov 2026, 06:46
14,162
-2
3 Nov 2026, 09:40
14,164
-4
2 Nov 2026, 09:06
14,168
+3
1 Nov 2026, 06:21
14,165
-4
30 Oct 2026, 04:00
14,169
+1
28 Oct 2026, 07:26
14,168
-1
27 Oct 2026, 04:47
14,169
+3
26 Oct 2026, 01:57
14,166
+4
25 Oct 2026, 02:26
14,162
-2
23 Oct 2026, 23:38
14,164
-3
23 Oct 2026, 00:01
14,167
+5
21 Oct 2026, 23:05
14,162
-8
20 Oct 2026, 14:31
14,170
+10
19 Oct 2026, 13:27
14,160
+4
17 Oct 2026, 11:45
14,156
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
115.4%
avg views ÷ 14,180 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,400
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
28 (27 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
180,060
Reactions total
540
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,600
Links
≈86
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,166 reactions across 28 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
479
41.1%
👍
217
18.6%
😢
155
13.3%
❤
105
9.01%
🔥
87
7.46%
😱
37
3.17%
🤔
35
3.00%
🤯
26
2.23%
👏
12
1.03%
🥰
8
0.686%
👎
5
0.429%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«Роль пчелы в годы войны особенно возросла» Благодарность пчеловоду
Ф.А-404. Оп.1. Д.99. Л.40,41.
Благодарность преподавателю курсов пчеловодства при Обществе охраны природы А. Стефанову от группы выпускников.
Послание составлено вскоре после завершения ВОВ и наполнено военно-патриотической риторикой, но при этом содержит некоторые сведения о роли пчеловодства в годы войны.
Выпускники пишут, что «роль пчелы в годы…
Оккупационные марки для литовских партизан. Просьба в Москву 1944г.
Ф.Р5446. Оп.46а. Д.3855. Л.1,3.
Просьба об особой финансовой поддержке партизанского движения, направленная в январе 1944 г. советскими и партийными властями Литвы (располагавшимися на неоккупированной территории СССР) в адрес Заместителя председателя Совнаркома СССР Николая Вознесенского.
В докуменнте обращается внимание на «особые условия» партиза…
«Для совместного удовлетворения религиозных потребностей». Переписка 1988 г.
Ф.10262. Оп.1.Д.7. Л.2,6.
Заявление от 1988 г. группы жителей Москвы во главе с будущим председателем Российской Христанско-демократической партии Виктором Аксючицес с просьбой передать верующим храм Михаила Архагела в Тропареве на юго-западе Москвы.
Виктор Аксючиц на тот момент оставался неформальным деятелем советского религиозного движ…
«Знание» против Вольфа Мессинга. Переписка 1950 г.
Р9547. Оп.1. Д.3086. Л.230,231,234,235.
Обсуждение Обществом «Знание» в 1950 г. целесообразности лекций по разоблачению мастера «телепатии» Вольфа Мессинга, официально выступавшего в СССР с сеансами как артист эстрады.
С идеей разобрать “искусство» Мессинга на популярной лекции, выступил философ-марксист Попов-Подольский. На предложение имеется отзыв известного ф…
«Душа народа звереет». Воззвание против политических казней
Ф.810. Оп.1.Д.60. Л.11.
Воззвание против массовых политических казней, обращенное к депутатам Государственной думы.
Документ, возможно, распространялся во время выборов во Вторую Государственную думу в 1907 г., когда в период Первой русской революции власти начали массово выносить ускоренные смертные приговоры участникам вооруженных выступлений и террори…
«Имущество было смерзшим в глыбы». Проверка интендантств 1943 г.
Ф.Р5446. Оп.65. Д.39. Л.112-116.
Сообщение на имя Анастаса Микояна, отвечавшего за вопросы снабжения Красной Армии небоевым имуществом, направленное в феврале 1943 г. заместителем Народного комиссара народного контроля Поповым о результатах проверки хода ремонта обмундирования на различных фронтах и в тылу.
Попов отмечает, что службы тыловых округов ф…
«Мы не должны пренебрегать даже мелочью». Проект выпуска ценных бумаг СССР. 1927г.
Ф.P3316. Оп.20. Д.1038. Л.6,7.
Записка наркома внутренней и внешней торговли Анастаса Микояна в адрес высших государственных и партийных руководителей от сентября 1927 г. с предложением выпуска ценных бумаг СССР для размещения на иностранных рынках.
В записке Микоян объясняет, что при всей желательности привлечь иностранный капитал …
Не-царский поезд. Инструкция Керенского по перевозке императорской семьи.
Ф.601. Оп.2. Д.14. Л.1,1об.
Составленная и подписанная Александром Керенским 31 июля 1917г. Инструкция по перевозке бывшего императора Николая II и его семьи из Царского села к месту нового содержания в Тобольске.
В инструкциии указывается, что Николай, его семья и согласившиеся их сопровождать лица числятся на положении арестованных. Движен…
Пустота валютных киосков. Жалоба «Интуриста» 1934г.
Ф.Р3316. Оп.27. Д.90. Л.6-7.
Записка организации «Интурист», направленная в ЦИК СССР 31 января 1934 г. и касающаяся организации валютной торговли в специализированных киосках.
«Интурист» сообщает, что для выполнения валютного плана нуждается в товарах «экспортного качества», чтобы реализовывать их в киосках при гостиницах и посещаемых иностранцами в ресторанах, Эт…
Налоговые льготы блокадного Ленинграда. Переписка 1942г.
Ф.А259. Оп.3. Д.1262. Л.13,13об.15.
Ходатайство Исполкома Ленсовета в Совнарком РСФСР от июля 1942г. о возможности освободить от уплаты местных налогов жилищный фонд города, а также предприятия местной промышленности и культурно-бытового обслуживания.
Власти блокадного города объясняют, что “поступления платежей по квартирной и арендной плате в г. Ленинграде р…
Лекции без запроса. Жалобы Павлодарских колхозов 1950г.
Ф.Р9547. Оп.1. Д.3086. Л.38-43.
Жалоба представителя Павлодарской области в Совете по делам колхозов при Совмине СССР В. Шелемотова на организацию работы на местах Общества по распространению политических и научных знаний (будущего Общества «Знание»).
Как следует из документа, члены Общества превратили выступления фактически в систему вымогательств. Так, по утв…
(Продолжение) Дополнительно Щелоков сообщает о лаборатории историко-георграфических и социологических исследований при Новосибирском отделении Географического общества СССР, которое занималось написанием историй богатых промышленных предприятий. Так, Норильский комбинат был готов заплатить за свою историю 110 000 рублей (перечислив 27 000 рублей аванса), а колхоз «Приамурский» - 41 000 рублей (перечислив сумму полн…
😁9👍6🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @garf_docs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Яндекс Поиск по архивам @yandexarchives · 19,955 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 October 2026
История и истории @historygothy · 20,837 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Документальное прошлое: ГА РФ” (@garf_docs), 14,180 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/garf_docs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.