Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for shitpost gannors

Channel

shitpost gannors

@ganolcitpos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

6subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001900833140
TypeChannel
Username@ganolcitpos
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 5 June 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ganolcitpos

Growth

614 Aug 2026, 06:47 — 6 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 11:59 — 6 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 06:4715 Aug 2026, 11:59
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 11:596no change
14 Aug 2026, 06:476first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2023, 12:17 UTC163 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @ofcgannorsPhoto

🥉 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐓𝐎 "𝐊𝐄𝐋𝐎𝐌𝐏𝐎𝐊 𝟓"

Signed karla sencãz

17 Jun 2023, 12:17 UTC142 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @ofcgannorsPhoto

🥈 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐓𝐎 "𝐊𝐄𝐋𝐎𝐌𝐏𝐎𝐊 𝟑"

Signed karla sencãz

17 Jun 2023, 12:17 UTC109 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @ofcgannorsPhoto

🥇 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐓𝐎 "𝐊𝐄𝐋𝐎𝐌𝐏𝐎𝐊 𝟏"

Signed karla sencãz

17 Jun 2023, 12:17 UTC87 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @ofcgannors

selamat siang, salam 6 agama. kami CREW GANNORS ingin mengumumkan pemenang dari event ini, jika diliat dari banyaknya jumlah voting di atas, pemenang event puzzle tersebut yaitu : JUARA 1 : KELOMPOK 1 JUARA 2 : KELOMPOK 3 JUARA 3 : KELOMPOK 5 congratulations to the winners of this event 👏🏻. and buat yang belum menang jangan berkecil hati, karena masih ada sedikit hadiah buat kalian, terimakasih.

Signed karla sencãz

17 Jun 2023, 12:17 UTC81 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @ofcgannors

selamat malam, salam 6 agama. sesuai dengan event kita kemarin dengan tema GUESS THE PUZZLE IN HELL kita akan melakukan sistem voting berdasarkan puzzle hasil yang telah dikumpulkan oleh masing-masing kelompok. voting akan dilakukan dengan pilih salah satu kelompok melalui poll dibawah ini. pemungutan voting akan dilakukan sampai besok jam 20.00 wib and pemenangnya kita liat dari voting terbanyak, bebas boleh minta

Signed karla sencãz

6 Jun 2023, 16:52 UTC68 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @ofcgannors

yang cdc baju nya bolong semua

Signed narel

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ganolcitpos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,256,025 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“shitpost gannors” (@ganolcitpos), 6 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ganolcitpos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.