Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КриптоАнализ 2.0 [Пивоты по Ганну]

@gannpivot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,271subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001767387945
TypeChannel
Username@gannpivot
Description⚛️Analysis: @YoungK1lla 🌒
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/gannpivot

Growth

1,2716 Aug 2026, 07:02 — 1,271 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:15 — 1,271 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 07:026 Aug 2026, 08:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,270–1,272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 08:151,271no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:021,271first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

24 Jun 2026, 06:02 UTC≈689 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#DEGEN 🧐 стоим ровно под сопротивлением, как получится его флипнуть, могут сильно запустить!

12 Jun 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#BTC нас конечно могут еще чуток сбросить вниз, но это будет понятно ближе к Пивотам.

12 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC≈918 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#BTC я думаю, мы все же будем двигаться по этому плану!

12 Jun 2026, 07:56 UTC≈884 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#BTC 🧐 чуток не дотянули до уровня, но сути не меняет. Терпеливо ждем Пивоты и главное до них удерживать поддержку.

4 May 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#BTC двигается по плану, не ожидайте какого-то резкого роста. Очень не плохо выстаивается альта и скорее всего, ближайшее время будут хорошие отскоки! Много монет очень не плохо закрыли месяц, рисуют как минимум локальный разворот.

14 Apr 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#ETH на обычной паре история примерно такая же, важно закрепится над сопротивлением. Тут Пивоты недельные, 27.04 и 20.06.

14 Apr 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#ETH к битку не плохо выстраивается, но важно закрепиться над сопротивлением. Месячные Пивот в августе и феврале.

14 Apr 2026, 08:03 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#CAKE рекомендую обратить внимание! Недельные Пивоты 27.04, 27.06.

13 Apr 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#BTC 🧐 Пивот отработал идеально и развернул движение. Следующие недельные 6.07 и 27.07. Не стоит ожидать какого-то резко роста, но я очень сомневаюсь, что нас уже будут заводить ниже 60ти. Сразу было понятно что тут буду пилить не один месяц, но ближайшие месяцы будут более интересными и не только на битке! Не мало монет тут будут разворачивать как минимум под отскок. Я включаюсь в работу, посты теперь буду выход

9 Mar 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#BTC еще немного пилы тут и увидим как минимум не плохой отскок. Альта конечно в печали, но пару монеток есть интересных. Ближе к концу месяца должно быть повеселее в рынке!

9 Feb 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,910 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#USDT доминация месячный Пивот в марте и июле!

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gannpivot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 193,497 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КриптоАнализ 2.0 [Пивоты по Ганну]” (@gannpivot), 1,271 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gannpivot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.