Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for گنجینه تاسیسات

Channel

گنجینه تاسیسات

@ganjine_tasisat

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,795subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001008636463
TypeChannel
Username@ganjine_tasisat
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ganjine_tasisat

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,78615,82615,8065 August 2026 — 15,826 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,825 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,821 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,822 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,823 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,824 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,821 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,818 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,820 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,819 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,826 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,824 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,820 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,815 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,814 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,808 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,809 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,811 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,810 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,804 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,800 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,799 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,795 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,793 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,788 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,791 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,787 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,786 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,795 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,793 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,792 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,795 subscribers15,7955 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,780–15,832 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:5815,795+3
16 Sept 2026, 20:1815,792-1
15 Sept 2026, 00:5815,793-2
13 Sept 2026, 11:3815,795+9
11 Sept 2026, 16:4015,786-1
5 Sept 2026, 15:1715,787-4
3 Sept 2026, 16:0015,791+3
2 Sept 2026, 12:2315,788-5
1 Sept 2026, 11:2915,793-2
31 Aug 2026, 08:0715,795-4
30 Aug 2026, 10:0415,799-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:3415,800-4
28 Aug 2026, 09:4215,804-6
27 Aug 2026, 06:5415,810-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:4315,811+2
25 Aug 2026, 05:4815,809+1
24 Aug 2026, 03:2415,808-6
22 Aug 2026, 08:5515,814-1
21 Aug 2026, 00:2315,815-5
18 Aug 2026, 19:1415,820first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

21 Mar 2025, 16:52 UTC≈19,000 viewsread 3 September 2026

❌هیچگاه چیلر با دبی ثابت با سیستم VRF دور متغیر مقایسه نکنید. قیاس از پایه اشتباهه. در مقایسه برابر باید هزینه تمام شده چیلر با دبی متغیر، شیرالات picv و کنترلر با سیستم VRF مقایسه کنید. بر حسب تجربیات پروژه های قبل، هزینه تمام شوه VRF کمتر از هزینه تمام شده چیلر با دبی متغیر و سیستم های کنترلی مرتبط با آن میشود.

21 Mar 2025, 16:45 UTC≈17,800 viewsread 3 September 2026

توی حالت پارشیال لود توان مصرفی vrf پایینتره

21 Mar 2025, 15:44 UTC≈16,500 viewsread 3 September 2026

اینجا چیلر اینورتردار می باشد.

21 Mar 2025, 15:42 UTC≈15,800 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

برای ساختمان مسکونی تک واحدی در نظرسنجی قبل، مقایسه ای بین VRF و چیلر انجام شد. در یک تناژ برابر 8 تن تبرید، توان مصرفی VRF کمتر از چیلر است.

21 Mar 2025, 12:50 UTC≈11,100 viewsread 3 September 2026

مورد دوم تو سری Z60 پکیج زمینی متفاوته ۱. سری z60دیگه مثل z36 لولاس هدر نداره ۲. تک پمپ سیرکوله دارد ۳.ابگرم مصرفی تو برگشت شیربرقی داره

21 Mar 2025, 12:28 UTC≈10,300 viewsread 3 September 2026

ما کارفرماهایی داشتیم که حتی صدای کارکرد پکیج دیواری نصب شده در بالکن، هنگام استراحت در شب باعث ازار اذیتشون میشده ⚠️برای تک تک این چالش ها باید راهکار اجرایی داشته باشید (نه اینکه بگیم خب به من چه!!)

21 Mar 2025, 12:15 UTC≈9,630 viewsread 3 September 2026

اینکه چرا پکیج دیواری نه؟ محدودیت دبی و هد پمپ پکیج. (اما بعضی وقتها بسته به معماری پروژه شده برای یک واحد دو پکیج دیواری مجزا هم جانمایی کردیم، دراین حالت مشکلی هم بابت تامین آبگرم نداریم حتی اگر دو دوش فعال شود).

21 Mar 2025, 12:04 UTC≈9,070 viewsread 3 September 2026

اینکه چرا داکت اسپلیت در گزینه های بالا نیاوردیم 👈استقلال کاربری ندارد اگرم قرار باشه هراتاق یک دستگاه مجزا نصب بشه در مجموع توان مصرفی و آمپر داکت اسپلیت های یک واحد به علاوه قیمت تمام شده آن، از سیستم VRF بالاتر می رود.

21 Mar 2025, 11:46 UTC≈8,670 viewsread 3 September 2026

۱.بمنبع انبساط دوم دقت کنید(آبگرم مصرفی) ۲. دو ست پمپ سیرکوله دارد (اولیه و ثانویه)

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ganjine_tasisat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Mar 2025, 15:13 UTCFinal Results786 voters

سیستم پیشنهادی برای هرواحد ۲۵۰ متری تک واحدی ... استقلال هزینه برای مالکین مهم است.

  1. پکیج زمینی + VRF (مستقل برای هرواحد)37%
  2. پکیج دیواری + VRF (مستقل برای هرواحد)27%
  3. موتورخانه گرمایشی مرکزی + VRF (مرکزی)8%
  4. موتورخانه گرمایشی + مینی (مستقل)13%
  5. ✅ مشاهده نظرات21%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2025 to 21 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سازمان نظام مهندسی ساختمان استان تهران
@tceopr · 26,666
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“گنجینه تاسیسات” (@ganjine_tasisat), 15,795 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ganjine_tasisat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.