Channel
@gamblingprobs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
766subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001049497932 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gamblingprobs |
| Created | 7 April 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gamblingprobs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 766 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 768 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 768 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
63 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 19 | 30.2% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 17.5% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 17.5% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 11.1% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 6.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 4.76% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| custom 5201990176175299013 | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.59% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2024 to 21 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ДНЯ ТОП-5: IMOEX, 1D 0.14% ТОП-5, 1D 0.23% — Портфель 0.35% — Hedge -0.11% ПОКАЗАТЕЛИ ПОРТФЕЛЯ ТОП-5: IMOEX* -10,90% Доходность* 4,96% Доходность, 30D 7,37% Доходность, QTD 6,99% Доходность, YTD +40,09% Max просадка, 90D -9,67% MAX дневная просадка, 90D -2,23% Доходность с last high …
👍1🔥1😍1
Пока на рынках мрачное погружение, расскажем о приятном. Во-первых, наша страта в закрытом канале дала +15% к индексу в режиме реального времени. Это приятно. 🥰 Во-вторых, у друзей вышел первый подкаст про фарму. Парни глубоко в теме, первый выпуск — разминочный, но уже понятно, что дальше будет жирррр. Наш канал свободен от рекламы за бабки, все рекомендации исключительно по любви🖤🖤🖤 Существует ли заговор миров…
🔥6
Video, posted without a caption
🇷🇺#RUB #fx ЦБ установил официальные курсы валют на выходные
😁2
Софтлайн — стронг бай?🤔😂
Update 27/07/2024 Евробонды Беларуси можно будет заместить на внутренние гособлигации через депозитарий-нерезидент Добавляется возможность замещения еврооблигаций на внутренние государственные облигации через депозитарий-нерезидент. Это предусмотрено постановлением Совета Министров и Национального банка № 540/20 от 26 июля 2024 года, которым вносятся изменения в постановление от 26 сентября 2022 года № 643/20 «О пров…
👍1
ЦБ СТРЕЛЯЕТ ПО КОЛЕНЯМ Все аналитики опирались на слова ЦБ и строили свои прогнозы (сбывшиеся), но никто не комментировал суть самих слов: Начиная от «сверхперегретости» экономики (естественно! Мы же рост >1% только по субботам на РенТВ видели..) и заканчивая бесконечными мантрами про 4% инфляцию (то ли как недостижимый идеал, то ли как Неуловимый Джо). ЦБ придумал (или подсмотрел) себе формулу и пихает в нее все …
🤔7🔥3❤2❤🔥2👍1
Циркачи
😁2
БАНК РОССИИ ОЖИДАЕМО ПОВЫСИЛ КЛЮЧЕВУЮ СТАВКУ НА 200 Б.П. - ДО 18% Замечено Шпионом РЦБ. Подключить: @StockSpy_bot
😁5
В личку спрашивают: а чего тогда банки ставки повышают? Друзья мои! Банковские казначейства никогда в жизни не фронтраннили ЦБ — им это ннннахер не надо. Казна работает по факту. Повышение ставок в банках имеет иную природу: А) Либо трещат нормативы краткосрочной ликвидности Б) Либо очередь стоит из желающих взять кредит под 20+ %% А) вероятнее Б) Причин, по которым может трещать НКЛ много, писать о них впадл…
👍4
Причин для 18% ставки НЕТ. Ладно бы там несколько маргиналов про 18% писало, чисто для полноценной картины, Но ведь все аналитики в унисон говорят так, будто это само собой разумеющееся действие — сделать реальную ставку +9%%. А че не 29?! «Аххуеть!» — пром стата слабая — инфляция на месте (даже снижается) — валюту убили — минфин уже просто не занимает — ипотеку свернули — налоги повысили Самое время еще и +200б…
🔥3👍2😁1
Как-то резко «всем селом» про дивы Яши заговорили — неужели точки роста закончились?🤔
😁1custom 52019901761752990131
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gamblingprobs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,033,295 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GAMBLING PROBLEMS” (@gamblingprobs), 766 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gamblingprobs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.