Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GalaxyWar Announcement

@galaxywarann

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,627subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001496844507
TypeChannel
Username@galaxywarann
CreatedBetween 1 June 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/galaxywarann

Growth

1,6271,6401,633.57 August 2026 — 1,640 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,640 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,635 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,627 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,625–1,642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:581,627-8
10 Aug 2026, 02:521,635-5
7 Aug 2026, 09:281,640no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:021,640first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

18 Dec 2022, 14:54 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Sending a plundering fleet involves random jumps, so it consumes a certain amount of BNB as fuel. 🪐 Every time you send a fleet, you can only attack a mining fleet randomly. If you win, your fleet will return with loot. If you fail, your fleet will be destroyed.🛸 #mining #P2E Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-pap

5 Dec 2022, 15:16 UTC865 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Any player can send a mining fleet to plunder other players who are mining on the high-risk planet.⚠️🪐 The player sends a mining fleet to a high-risk planet, and the fleet jumps through the stargate to randomly search for a mining fleet and start a #plunder. ⚔️🤺 #p2e #mining Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-pape

29 Nov 2022, 03:33 UTC658 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏆 FREE MINT, WIN PRIZES 🏆 GalaxyWarNFT is collaborating with the OKX NFT Football Cup. Come and join the party and mint your teams NFT on OKX wallet! @OKCNetwork If your team wins, and you WIN! okx.com/web3/nft/footb… #NTFs #OKC Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-paper

25 Nov 2022, 06:19 UTC493 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💎 Dear GalaxyWarriors 💎 Refer to the previous bug with high-risk planet mining where the pirate NPCs would loot $GWT when the fleet was sufficient.🪐 The lost $GWT due to the bug in High-Risk Planet mining has been refunded to the players. Please kindly check your wallet💰 Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-paper

22 Nov 2022, 14:22 UTC380 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

🤖#Mining Robots will do the actual work of mining rewards.💰 Eachbrobot is an NFT that players can buy, trade, and sell through our Marketplace: market-bsc.galaxywar.io There are 6️⃣ distinct robots in total with different mining powers.🤖 #Blockchaingaming #Multiverse Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-paper

20 Nov 2022, 16:02 UTC338 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

↔️ The endurance of a mining fleet is determined by the robot with the longest endurance in the fleet. If the robot in fleet is exhausted, the corresponding power will be lost and the other robots will work normally until players run out of robots, and fleet power decreased to 0. Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-

19 Nov 2022, 14:06 UTC321 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

1️⃣ Having more thain one ship is ideal as it enables players to mine more rewards.💸 🔋 The power of a #mining fleet is determined by the sum of the mining power of all the robots each ship contains.🤖 #blockchaingame #Metaverse #NFTs Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-paper

18 Nov 2022, 14:56 UTC319 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🛳 Mining barges contain 6️⃣ slots, each of which can equip 1️⃣ robot. ⏹ Once all slots are full, no other robots can be equipped to that ship and players will need to build another mining ship to equip more robots.🤖 #mining #P2E #NFTs Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-paper

16 Nov 2022, 15:29 UTC303 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🆕 The following bugs have been fixed for the latest version: 1. Fixed the upper limit of the capacity of the Level 8 storehouses. 2. Fixed a bug with high-risk planet mining where the pirate NPCs would loot $GWT when the fleet was sufficient. ⚠️ Please Note: The GWT looted by the pirate NPCs will be refunded to the corresponding wallet address within a week. Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Pl

11 Nov 2022, 12:57 UTC308 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

☄️Any player can send a mining fleet to plunder other players who are mining on the high-risk planet. 🪐 🔛 The player sends a mining fleet to a high-risk planet, and the fleet jumps through the stargate to randomly search for a mining fleet and start a plunder. ⚔️ #P2E #PvP Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-paper

1 Nov 2022, 15:35 UTC334 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A more powerful escort is essential. Not only do pirate NPCs appear on the High-Risk planet, but other fleets can also intercept their mining barges. The Pirate NPCs cruise and plunder the planet in a certain period, but they can strengthen their combat effectiveness. #mining Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-pa

28 Oct 2022, 15:00 UTC330 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🪐The High-Risk planet CORELLIA is available now! ⏰ 💰Minable $GWT: 19,636,363 GWT 👉 Know More information about high-risk mining in our Medium Article. #mining #Multiverse #P2E Support and Retweet GalaxyWarNFT Official Channel: Play Game ‖ Website ‖ Announcement ‖ Twitter ‖ Community ‖ Medium ‖ YouTube ‖ White-paper

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @galaxywarann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 597,257 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GalaxyWar Announcement” (@galaxywarann), 1,627 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/galaxywarann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.