Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГАГАРИНСКИЙ САД

Channel

ГАГАРИНСКИЙ САД

@gagarinsad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

177subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002308025900
TypeChannel
Username@gagarinsad
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/gagarinsad

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

176177176.512 August 2026 — 176 subscribers12 August 2026 — 176 subscribers29 September 2026 — 177 subscribers12 August 202629 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 48 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 176–177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 00:41177+1
12 Aug 2026, 15:24176no change
12 Aug 2026, 11:31176first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5846.4%
❤4939.2%
🔥1310.4%
🕊32.40%
🙏21.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 13 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2025, 15:14 UTC141 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌿 Пермакультура: Принцип 5 — Используй и цени возобновляемые ресурсы и услуги природы 1. Используй и цени возобновляемые ресурсы и услуги (Use and Value Renewable Resources and Services) Пермакультура учит нас максимально использовать природные ресурсы, которые восстанавливаются естественным путём, и ценить услуги природы, такие как опыление, фильтрация воды, создание почвы и климатическая регуляция . Примеры прим…

👍3🕊3

13 Jul 2025, 15:07 UTC117 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌿 Пермакультура: принцип 2 – Достижение результатов + Саморегуляция и обратная связь 1. Получай урожай (Obtain a Yield) Пермакультура — это не только о «зелёной красоте», но и о получении реальной пользы от каждого элемента системы — будь то еда, волокна, топливо, лекарства или эстетическое наслаждение. * Это позволяет системе быть самодостаточной и мотивирующей: когда видишь первые плоды, хочется продолжать и сов…

❤4

9 Jul 2025, 09:56 UTC121 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌱 Пермакультура: фокус на первых принципах 1. Наблюдай и взаимодействуй (Observe & Interact) Пермакультура начинается с внимательного наблюдения за природой — за солнечным светом, ветрами, циркуляцией воды, растениями и животными. Только поняв, как всё функционирует — можно начать работать с экосистемой, а не против неё. Эффективный дизайн строится на механизме «наблюдать — попробовать — оценить — корректировать». …

👍8❤2

5 Jul 2025, 13:34 UTC141 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌿 Растения-индикаторы: что "говорит" крапива и почему хвощ — не просто сорняк? Некоторые растения появляются там, где другим трудно выжить — и именно этим они ценны. Такие виды называют растениями-индикаторами: по ним можно понять, в каком состоянии находится почва. 🔥 Крапива растёт на почвах, богатых органикой и азотом. Если её много — это может указывать на переудобрение, наличие стоков или нарушения в экосистеме…

👍7❤2🙏2

22 Jun 2025, 12:46 UTC208 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Лишайники: что они говорят о воздухе💨🪸 Думаю, многие знают еще со школы, что если гибнут лишайники - воздух загрязнен. И это действительно так! Диагностика состояния атмосферного воздуха с помощью лишайников называется лихеноиндикация (от лихено - лишайник). Некоторые методы лихеноиндикации: 🌲Оценка проективного покрытия. Определяют отношение покрытой лишайниками части ствола к его общей поверхности. 🪸Изучение вид…

❤7👍3

20 Jun 2025, 20:49 UTC≈1,150 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐸 Лягушки и жабы как сигнал тревоги: что происходит с водоёмами? Лягушки, жабы и тритоны — не просто обитатели прудов, а важные биоиндикаторы. Их исчезновение — первый тревожный знак того, что с водоёмом что-то не так. 🌊 Почему именно они? Эти амфибии дышат кожей, и любые изменения в воде или почве они ощущают моментально. Их кожа уязвима к токсинам, пестицидам, тяжёлым металлам, солям и даже шумовому загрязнению. …

🔥10❤4

19 Jun 2025, 16:11 UTC≈1,300 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🍃 Парк "Северное Тушино" приглашает принять участие в уникальном волонтёрском проекте по изучению, сохранению и увеличению биоразнообразия естественной природы - "Природа и человек в большом городе". В рамках проекта мы сможем не только вносить реальный вклад в сохранение и развитие живой природы, но и общаться со специалистами: биологами, ботаниками, почвоведами, энтомологами, орнитологами, зоологами и получать новы…

👍6🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @gagarinsad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГАГАРИНСКИЙ САД” (@gagarinsad), 177 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gagarinsad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.